Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Video does lie...

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
 
Brothaman2k Donating Member (63 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-16-06 04:54 PM
Original message
Video does lie...
I just came from the Judicial Watch website (JudicialWatch.com) for this nifty video that would dispell all the 9/11 conspiracy theories.

As far as I'm concerned, it's garbage. First of all this is exactly the video that I figured they were talking about when I first heard of the release of this end all, be all video. The first time I saw it was actually on 9/11. In all the flood of imagery that was being broadcast at the time it was probably the first piece of footage any network got hold of when it came to the attack on the Pentagon.

Now I have to admit it. The first time I saw it, it fooled the hell out of me. In the aftermath of the attacks looking at the wreckage of both the twin towers an the pentagon it was hard to take it all in and so it was an effective put off. A convenient excuse to put aside the doubts I had that very day about the validity of the official account of the attack on this country that killed so many. Oh, but make no mistake... I had doubts.

The first time I saw the view from above the pentagon and the smoldering wreckage of the side of the building I could only think one thing. "What... That's it?! You mean to tell two planes nail both twin towers and sends them crumbling to the ground in a plume of dust that damn near covered the entire city of New York... but the same type of plane with the same amount of fuel in it slam clean and head on into the side of the Pentagon and that's all that happened?

A caved in roof... blown out windows... scorch marks on the walls... a decent sized hole... Oh hell naw. Half that complex should have been OBLITERATED! And that's exactly what I thought... until I saw that video that is. Until I saw the big ball of fire. That mini conflagration made it easy to let go of the doubts. Made it simple not to deal with the facts that were perfectly obvious by the vastly understated damage that happened to a set of buildings that couldn't have been half the mass of either one of those towers. Which is to say nothing of the pristine nature of the Pentagon lawn or the fact that no matter how hot the fire was the fact is the wreckage of the plane wouldn't have simply evaporated. (Somebody show me an actual plane in that wreckage and I'll think about changing my mind.)

Well I can't say that I've never repeated a mistake in this life, but I won't be fooled again. This video that is only being rehashed now won't fool me again. You want to show me a video that dispells my doubts? Show me the video from the traffic cam above the Virginia Transportation Authority that woul have shown the plane passing over the interstate into Maryland as it approached the pentagon. Show me the video confiscated from the camera on the roof of the hotel (I believe it was a Marriot) that had full view of the Pentagon... or the security cam from the gas station that's the last structure you pass before you head onto the grounds of the Pentagon... both of which have NEVER been released.

We'll see if Judicial Watch files suit over those. Now if they can show me a 747 flying about 20' above the ground, being set on an excellent approach path by a pilot, that by the reports of the folks who trained him in flight school, as far as being a pilot goes, couldn't find his ass with both hands and a flashlight. Show it to W... no, I take that back. Don't show it to me.

Prove it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Karenca Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-16-06 04:59 PM
Response to Original message
1. Video's a lie, more bullshit....nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
onehandle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-16-06 05:00 PM
Response to Original message
2. Witnesses ------>
More useless grainy footage to get us to don our tinfoil suits.

They don't want us to talk about the FACT that that BUSH FAILED TO PROTECT US.

They want us to talk about CONSPIRACIES.

You are falling for Rove's plan - hook, line, and sinker - if you talk about anything except BUSH FAILING TO PROTECT US.

Witnesses:
http://urbanlegends.about.com/library/blflight77w.htm
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MADem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-16-06 05:01 PM
Response to Original message
3. I dunno if you would get much out of the gas station
It's in a bowl of sorts. While you are standing by your car, you cannot see the Pentagon. I know that pictures taken (at great height) make it appear as though you could, but unless you are taller than David Gregory, you might see nothing more than a slice of the roof. That said, the security cameras might have gotten a glimpse, but the ones I recall were over the door, under the canopy, and pointed at the pumps. There are also cameras at the ATM around the side, but those are contained within the ATM and point at the ATM customers.

The second video is clearer than the first to my eyes, FWIW.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
librechik Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-16-06 05:05 PM
Response to Original message
4. If the evidence of the plane is so clear and indisputable
why can't we simply see it? Seems that would shut up most of the conspiracy nuts right away. If ever a party is determined to NOT show evidence, my automatic response is suspicion of their assertions. They could get my silence so easily: release ALL other video evidence of the attack. Who could that hurt at this point?

Only Shrub and his devotees. If it could help him, why hasn't it been released?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
onenote Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-16-06 05:05 PM
Response to Original message
5. i assume you meant 767 not 747
there's a substantial difference between the two...

onenote
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
applegrove Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-16-06 05:07 PM
Response to Original message
6. Nice of the WH to release this so promptly to help people get more
facts if they need it. Only after Judicial Watch and 5 years.

Why are the neocons at times so slow.. and at other times in such a hurry?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sun May 12th 2024, 06:50 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC