Neecy
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Jan-12-06 07:22 PM
Original message |
This is how brainwashing works |
|
CNN just aired a very good segment on the retired University of Kansas professor whose personal mail was opened by DHS. It was a true glimpse into how this government is intruding upon the privacy of law-abiding citizens in the name of the 'war' on terror.
Apparently a non-propagandized segment was too much for Blitzer. He primped toward the camera and said in dramatic tones, "Keep tuned to CNN for up-to-the date information about your security."
Suddenly, this segment about abuse of our privacy rights became a segment on our security.
The psyops boys in the CNN newsroom are doing a fine job.
|
Ron Green
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Jan-12-06 07:30 PM
Response to Original message |
1. This is also how brainwashing works: |
|
In your account of the CNN report I read "DHS" and immediately thought of Department of Human Services, because it's an agency with whom I frequently work and to which I often refer. Nowhere in your post is mentioned "Department of Homeland Security," which I assume is what you mean. The fact that "DHS" automatically now means this, without explanation, is somewhat chilling.
|
Neecy
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Jan-12-06 07:32 PM
Response to Reply #1 |
|
It was opened and read by the US Customs Service, which falls under the Department of Homeland Security. Sorry about the confusion.
|
leftstreet
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Jan-12-06 07:30 PM
Response to Original message |
2. Any commercial$ yet for anti-$pying $ecurity product$? |
|
Edited on Thu Jan-12-06 07:30 PM by leftstreet
As Seen On TV
|
blm
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Jan-12-06 07:30 PM
Response to Original message |
3. EXACTLY....and the RW's so-called 'freedom lovers' are too dumb to see it. |
FreedomAngel82
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Jan-12-06 07:32 PM
Response to Reply #3 |
|
They're all hypocrites. They're not bringing freedom to anybody but fascism all around. People are uncomfortable with that word but that's what it is. Try to find the ten signs of fascism. Welcome to it.
|
blm
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Jan-12-06 07:35 PM
Response to Reply #5 |
6. The RW sheep are so dumbed down they don't even see the fascism. |
|
Actually, I would bet that you ask any ten of them what fascism means and they will say ANYTHING BUT corporate-run government.
|
SmokingJacket
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Jan-12-06 07:37 PM
Response to Original message |
|
Honestly, who's paying the guy? What a zombie for the right...
|
Canuckistanian
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Jan-12-06 07:38 PM
Response to Original message |
8. Your security illusions, you mean |
|
Oh, look! A new iPod!
I like new things.
|
Little Star
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Jan-12-06 07:39 PM
Response to Original message |
|
I'm writing that little piece of shit. Anyone want to join me here is the link http://www.cnn.com/feedback/forms/form5.html?65
|
Initech
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Jan-12-06 07:40 PM
Response to Original message |
10. And the repukes say our government doesnt spread propaganda. |
bobthedrummer
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Jan-12-06 07:55 PM
Response to Original message |
11. It's brainwashing/ mind control/PSYOPS but the acceptable term |
|
for this is perception management. These other terms usually set off allegations of conspiracy theory-perception management is no theory and your example sounds like many others used by the "shadow government" of George W. Bush for an unknown agenda that ignores reality. http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=364x71919
|
Mnemosyne
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Jan-12-06 08:48 PM
Response to Original message |
12. thanks Neecy, so important, so few |
|
Edited on Thu Jan-12-06 08:48 PM by vickiss
truly understand...
V
|
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Fri Apr 26th 2024, 05:28 AM
Response to Original message |