Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Wash Journal-CSPAN: Ann Marie Squeo, WSJ, talking about

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-22-06 06:52 AM
Original message
Wash Journal-CSPAN: Ann Marie Squeo, WSJ, talking about
Edited on Mon May-22-06 06:53 AM by babylonsister
CIA leak investigation, Fitz, Rove, Truthout, etc. Primarily speculation as no one knows nothin'!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
DemonFighterLives Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-22-06 06:54 AM
Response to Original message
1. Just sat down
Thanks for the heads up.
Is she an expert?
My goodness, it is like the mod. is catching some of this the first time.
MSM- here it comes.
:bounce:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-22-06 06:57 AM
Response to Reply #1
3. She doesn't know much more than anyone else, though she does
Edited on Mon May-22-06 06:58 AM by babylonsister
have some insight as a journalist. Mentioned Truthout's 'apology' but called it nebulous.

Edit to add: She's a Justice Department reporter.

Cheney very much involved.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dogday Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-22-06 06:55 AM
Response to Original message
2. Add this report from WAPO
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
w8liftinglady Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-22-06 07:07 AM
Response to Original message
4. you all realize this host is the one who hired Colbert:)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
w8liftinglady Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-22-06 07:07 AM
Response to Reply #4
5. ...I believe...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GreatCaesarsGhost Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-22-06 07:29 AM
Response to Reply #5
13. that was steve scully
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
w8liftinglady Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-22-06 07:08 AM
Response to Original message
6. the democrat line callers are making good points.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SHRED Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-22-06 07:08 AM
Response to Original message
7. She is milk toast
Claims Plame's CIA status, at the time, is still under question?

Give me a break.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lala_rawraw Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-22-06 07:29 AM
Response to Reply #7
14. wow, she has no clue
someone call and ask her a basic question about this ... Viv has already been put aside... good god this woman knows nada
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SHRED Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-22-06 07:34 AM
Response to Reply #14
16. Why would the WSJ hire a "Valley Girl"?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lala_rawraw Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-22-06 07:36 AM
Response to Reply #16
18. This is funny, somehow and out of nowhere she is an expert
a WSJ columnist who never really added o the reporting of this story... say what? And this is who WSJ to attack the blogs?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DemonFighterLives Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-22-06 07:10 AM
Response to Original message
8. Freeper caller=
a duh, fitz has been on it for 2 1/2 years and all he has is one guy lied to the Grand Jury whatever.
I guess lying to a grand jury means nothing in freepland unless it is Bill Clinton talking about sex, then all bets are off.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SHRED Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-22-06 07:11 AM
Response to Reply #8
9. yeah I heard that...
...he said, "whatever".

jeezus
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DemonFighterLives Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-22-06 07:39 AM
Response to Reply #9
20. Any crimes committed by dubco
is easily excused as whatever.
Nothing to see here- but how about those immigrants stealing our jobs. :sarcasm:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-22-06 07:11 AM
Response to Original message
10. Who signed Wilson's gov't travel authorization to go to Niger?
That would put that question to rest. Why hasn't that been addressed?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
maine_raptor Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-22-06 07:17 AM
Response to Reply #10
11. That name would be classified, but
the position (aka how many pay grades above her) might be release-able. I would guess that the CIA would not be happy if they had to cut loose with a name.

There are rules and laws and such against that, you know. :sarcasm:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-22-06 07:21 AM
Response to Reply #11
12. I meant Joe Wilson's authorization, and I'd like to know what
agency, not necessarily who. That would solve who asked him to go. Very simple, but I'm hearing crickets. It's much easier for everyone to say Plame, his wife, sent him, but I don't think she had the authority to do so. At the very least it would appear suspect as he's her husband.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
maine_raptor Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-22-06 07:30 AM
Response to Reply #12
15. If I remember correctly.........
Edited on Mon May-22-06 07:30 AM by maine_raptor
it was someone higher up the did the authorization. I don't recall how high up, but I do remember reading it in some of the early reporting when the story broke.

How higher up would reveal a couple of things; the amount of bureaucracy (oversight) needed to set something like this up, and the amount of interest and priority the mission had (the higher up, the more priority).



Edit for typo.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DemonFighterLives Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-22-06 07:36 AM
Response to Reply #15
17. Maybe, I'm dreaming
but I once thought GFY cheney had something to do with it until Joe was straight and didn't tow the PNAC party line. Then he didn't know who Joe was and set out to out Valerie.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-22-06 07:39 AM
Response to Reply #17
19. Didn't his notations on the NYTimes editorial written by Wilson
ask who sent Wilson to Africa? That would kind of negate Cheney being involved.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DemonFighterLives Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-22-06 07:43 AM
Response to Reply #19
21. Remeber Gfy was working over time at the cia
unlike any other vp ever.
He knows who knows.

I'm going to post my theory of the whole Plamegate thing here.
I've been thinking.
Skunky cheney is going to take the hit while rover and dubby skate off into obscurity. I don't know how it all shakes out, but near dead cheney will take the bitter pill just like Casey did before him. Save b*shco Uber Alles.
:dem:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
maine_raptor Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-22-06 07:44 AM
Response to Reply #17
22. I think babylonsister is talking about
who within the CIA authorized the Wilson trip. The actual "OK, send him" that lead to the NYT op-ed that the Big Dick scribbled on.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-22-06 07:49 AM
Response to Reply #22
24. Thanks. Yes, that's what I want to know. Plame's name is not
on that travel authorization, I'm betting.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DemonFighterLives Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-22-06 07:51 AM
Response to Reply #22
27. Well, I 'm sure it wasn't Valerie as the talking points keep stating
Valerie could have said that Joe knows where to go and who to talk to, but she didn't make the final decision.
Dubby struts around saying he will fire anyone who leaked the info. Then the stupid little freak goes on vacation while knowing who, what happened. When it got too deep he comes up with his ability to declassify on a whim.
All their stories are lies!
GFY cheney knew and dubby knew and rover and libby and powell and condi and the whole WHIG.
:freak:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
maine_raptor Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-24-06 08:01 AM
Response to Reply #27
43. Ah, yes the "Talking Point". Funny thing about that.
Edited on Wed May-24-06 08:03 AM by maine_raptor
Typical right-wing TP in a way. Take a complicated tale and put it in a 7 second sound bite rather than admit that Wilson was on an authorized mission as part of inquiry into a legitimate intelligence question; Did Saddam try to buy Yellowcake?

Here's the real funny thing:

The Wilson's de-brief and report after the mission would have been available to WHIG. That info would contain not only the results of his mission, but the origins too.

They would know that Wilson would not agree with pushing a nuclear case (the post trip report)as a reason to go into the Iraq War, and knowing that he was a "soft Bush supporter" (past Campaign contributions via the FEC), figure on his speaking out at some point.

Now if they knew how he got sent(i.e. his wife suggestion at the start), could they already have had that TP prepared as part of the enviable blow back once they unleashed their planned retaliation on him (the outing of his wife).

Funny how that all works, eh?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dogday Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-22-06 07:47 AM
Response to Reply #10
23. Wilson was asked by Plame's Superiors
They were asked by Cheney, who did not know they would ask Wilson to go... When Plame's superiors mentioned they needed to send someone to niger via the VP request, she suggested her husband and arranged the meeting....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-22-06 07:50 AM
Response to Reply #23
26. Yes, all perfectly legitimate imo. Wilson was a former ambassador
Edited on Mon May-22-06 07:51 AM by babylonsister
and had the experience. But all the speculation that either Cheney or Plame sent Wilson drives me crazy!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dogday Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-22-06 07:52 AM
Response to Reply #26
29. That decision was always up to the CIA
And it was the CIA who intially requested the investigation...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-22-06 07:50 AM
Response to Original message
25. getting an earful from callers--some reveal their ignorance of the consti
tution.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-22-06 07:51 AM
Response to Reply #25
28. reading an article: Gonzalas saying reporters can be procecuted for
leaking classified information. I missed where this came from.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dogday Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-22-06 07:53 AM
Response to Reply #28
30. I wonder does that include
White House staff too.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-22-06 07:55 AM
Response to Reply #30
33. te he. of course not!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GreatCaesarsGhost Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-22-06 07:53 AM
Response to Reply #25
31. but that woman had a brother at the pentagon who knew
valerie plame wasn't covert. what more proof do we need?

definitely the backwash calling in.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-22-06 08:01 AM
Response to Reply #31
36. Who have they been listening to; Rush, Hannity, O'Lielly?
Certainly no one telling the truth. Remember the article in the NYT (I think) claiming Wilson's neighbors didn't even know what her job was?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GreatCaesarsGhost Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-22-06 08:15 AM
Response to Reply #36
40. yes, that's exactly what i thought, too.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Carni Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-22-06 08:16 AM
Response to Reply #31
41. I heard that old hag
Why is it that most of the repuke callers are women who sound like they are about 100 years old?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-22-06 07:54 AM
Response to Original message
32. I think this is the 3rd caller saying Plame's employment was not a
secret. that it was out that she worked in the CIA
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-22-06 07:56 AM
Response to Original message
34. another caller saying how good Pres. Bush is at protecting the country.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-22-06 07:58 AM
Response to Original message
35. "God bless GWB" says a caller. I hear Clarance Thomas said the we
should pray for him (was on DU someplace just a bit ago).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DemonFighterLives Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-22-06 08:12 AM
Response to Reply #35
39. The fundy freepers were out in force
Their talking points are so hard to listen too after hearing them 75,000 times (est).
dubby has done such a good job keeping us safe since 911, except for that particular slip up that was on his watch.
:dem:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
peacetalksforall Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-22-06 08:01 AM
Response to Original message
37. Why is C-Span devoting so much time to 'the leak'. Regrettably, it's
all about Plame and in what I've heard so far - only one caller brought up Brewster-Jennings. We are such an uniformed mess of a country.

We all know that the books to be written will expose the real causes of the WH conspiracy to close B-J. Why are we skirting the issue? The PNAC WH is still winning.

Back to my original question - why all this leak talk on C-Span?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DemonFighterLives Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-22-06 08:09 AM
Response to Reply #37
38. They couldn't suppress it any longer
Time for a limited hangout. Very limited indeed.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Laura PourMeADrink Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-22-06 08:17 AM
Response to Reply #37
42. maybe c-span has inside knowledge that indictments are coming
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 18th 2024, 11:29 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC