Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

I need a response to this RW idiotic rant.

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
 
azmouse Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-22-06 02:38 PM
Original message
I need a response to this RW idiotic rant.
"Enron (and several other companies) execs cooked their books under the Clinton administration to help build that 'false' economy he was so proud of... and oh, by the way, it was the Bush's administration, the SEC that investigated Enron and so many other companies we keep hearing about and are responsible for bringing all their fraudulent activities to light. But hey what difference will that make, right? Everyone knows everything that happened leading up to 9/11 and all the 1990s corporate raiding was all Bush's fault, even though he had barely taken office at the time all these things occurred."


This is from a non-political message board where I post so I need a brief response. It just pisses me off to hear shit like this. What would you say as a response?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Lars39 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-22-06 02:40 PM
Response to Original message
1. They asserted,they have to prove.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hand Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-22-06 02:41 PM
Response to Original message
2. Oh, lemme see...
Political contributions, Bush Pioneers, "Kenny Boy", the list is endless...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gordianot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-22-06 02:41 PM
Response to Original message
3. Did Bill Clinton deny he knew Kenny Boy?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HiFructosePronSyrup Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-22-06 02:42 PM
Response to Original message
4. Ken Lay had his own desk in the Bush WH.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
azmouse Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-22-06 02:43 PM
Response to Reply #4
6. He did?
Is that for real? I'd never heard anything like that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ClassWarrior Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-22-06 02:43 PM
Response to Original message
5. "Prove it... with links." And then I'd hound the jerk for proof...
...every day until he/she starts to fry.

NGU.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bowens43 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-22-06 02:44 PM
Response to Original message
7. How about 'Go f*ck yourself , moron'?
It is not possible to reason with a bushbot.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
azmouse Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-22-06 02:47 PM
Response to Reply #7
9. That's probably the best response.
Anyone that would still defend * is too far gone to be reasoned with. I just don't want others to think his spewings contain any truth.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BoneDaddy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-22-06 02:44 PM
Response to Original message
8. Richard Clark
Read Richard Clark's latest book (forget the name) about the transfer of power from Clinton and what Bush neglected when he took office. Clinton had terrorism as part of his "top five" issues of most importance. Bush dismantled and ignored much of what Clinton had done (which was alot) re: terrorism. Bush ignored a PDB presidential daily briefing that stated specifically... The Taliban determined to strike the USA. He pretty much ignored it, meanwhile even a cursory search or investigation into the matter would have revealed FBI reports about Muslims pilot plans that were highly suspicious because the terrorists wanted only how to fly and not to take off or land. That is a huge mistake.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
azmouse Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-22-06 02:47 PM
Response to Reply #8
11. This is good too!
Thanks!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
reichstag911 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-22-06 02:49 PM
Response to Reply #8
16. It's not Clarke's "latest,"...
...but what you're thinking of is Against All Enemies. His latest is a novel on the Middle East entitled The Scorpion's Gate.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BoneDaddy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-23-06 09:43 AM
Response to Reply #16
29. Another
book to add to my list...thanks for the correction.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
librechik Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-22-06 03:54 PM
Response to Reply #8
28. oh, you mean that liberal traitor?
sorry, people like the one you are responding to will not credit Clarke with anything.

Just say, look, we aren't talking about Clinton. What did Bush do that was so good? And if it was so good, why have all his brilliant plans failed miserably and why are his ratings lower than a snake's patoot?

If he's so great, why does he have to borrow money from the Chinese to keep his Iraq invasion going? At least Clinton, for all his tricks, left a surplus that Sonny blew within months of getting elected?

Why didn't he do his job? "Bin Laden determined to attack" time for a vaction? Why did Congress ridicule Clinton for going after Bin Laden? "No war for Monica" Bad "War cuz he tried to kill mah daddy" Righteous. Huh?

Me I'd just ignore this clown.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Gregorian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-22-06 02:47 PM
Response to Original message
10. If anything, Enron was a drag on the economy.
Isn't it maddening to see these so-called conservative idiots who simply have to prove how right they are? I have avoided politics except over here. But lately I've just peered into some forums, and it's just pathetic. Racist, bigot, homophobe, Bush loving clowns. But downright mean and cocky.

I will say right off that I don't know much about how Enron affected the economy. But I can guess that they were hoarding the money to themselves. I imagine that Enron was insignificant in terms of the overall economy. And one good argument is the HUGE deficit that was left for Clinton. He had to overcome the irresponsible people who just left it in his lap.

If he's going to blab about 9/11, you have a can of worms so big you can bury the guy. Way to big to even go into here. I wish there were a way to open the minds of these people. They're sick. If they weren't belligerent, it would be tolerable.

Best of luck. You aren't alone.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
azmouse Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-22-06 02:50 PM
Response to Reply #10
17. This guy is a real piece of shit.
He spews the RW party line all the time. But get this, he's married and hits on all the young women who post at the message board claiming his wife doesn't want to have sex with him. Hypocrisy thy name is Republikkkan.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lpbk2713 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-22-06 02:56 PM
Response to Reply #17
20. Credit to his wife for apparently showing good taste....... n/t



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
orwell Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-22-06 02:47 PM
Response to Original message
12. Clinton...
Edited on Mon May-22-06 02:48 PM by orwell
...is no longer President so he is not relevant.

All government statistics are cooked to make career politicians look better. It has been going on for decades if not longer.

Stop shifting the focus. The Republicans have controlled all branches of government for years. It is cowardice for those who claim to be the "Party of Responsibility."

Put up or shut up.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rosemary2205 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-22-06 02:48 PM
Response to Original message
13. I'd ignore it as pointless flamebait
if you really must respond just point out it's pointless flamebait - either than or point out the post doesn't belong on a non political board and would be better suited for freep central.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lpbk2713 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-22-06 02:48 PM
Response to Original message
14. They get these TP's from assholes like Limbore



and then repeat it as though it were from God's lips to their ears. They don't have a functional brain, they simply repeat what they hear.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jedicord Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-22-06 02:49 PM
Response to Original message
15. The SEC under Bush isn't what brought Enron to light.
It was the stocks plummeting and everyone at the company losing their job. That's when the SEC started investigating, and the other similar investigations were related to Enron and its aftermath.

It was the planes tearing into the buildings that made Bush quit reading "My Pet Goat" and take a gander at the infamous "Bin Laden Determined to Strike in the USA".

Then quietly bring up Bush's role at Harken. Cheney's Energy Task Force, behind closed doors with the oil companies.

How about WMDs, uranium tubes, Saddam/Al Queda connections?

Sheesh, I'm just getting started!

But then your opponent will bring up the Clenis, so ... what's the use?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mandate My Ass Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-22-06 02:53 PM
Response to Reply #15
18. Yes, plus Arthur Andersen was helping them hide the damage
until they could loot everything.

Arthur Andersen was convicted of obstruction of justice for its role in the Enron collapse. However, the Supreme(ly corrupt) Court overturned the conviction last year.

http://www.marketwatch.com/News/Story/Story.aspx?guid=%7B2A0AE39F%2D2EA1%2D4B8F%2DA5EE%2D8FF613AAC634%7D&siteid=google&dist=

Clenis, clenis, clenis! :woohoo:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sallyseven Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-22-06 03:10 PM
Response to Reply #15
23. Enron screwed the electricity cos.
in California and then Davis lost his job. The repukes have no morals at all the energy prices went through the roof and Kenny boy laughed with his friends. I hope they find him guilty.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Warpy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-22-06 02:55 PM
Response to Original message
19. Well, he's right about most of the cooking happening under Clinton
but the current gang actively supported Enron in looting California when it looked like the house of cards was about to collapse. Only when Jeffords defected, giving Democrats a majority in the Senate and the ability to pursue an investigation of the looting of California did the looting stop. Deprived of that cash flow, Enron could do nothing but collapse under its own weight.

Investigations didn't start until AFTER the collapse. It's been 5 years and Lay is still free as a wee birdie. That doesn't speak well of the current administration's priorities when it comes to massive white collar crime.

The last statement about 9/11 was nonsensical and puts your friend into Sunday's Doonesbury cartoon.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
zulchzulu Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-22-06 03:01 PM
Response to Original message
21. Enron has links to Reagan/Bush Crime Family...case closed...period.
Edited on Mon May-22-06 03:07 PM by zulchzulu
I'd say Enron and Kenny Lay actually was doing dirty deeds during the Reagan Administration and had strong ties to Daddy Bush...bzzzzt....Reagan is responsible for the whole nightmare of deregulation in the energy industries, among others.

Then I'd coldcock punch the simple fuckhead in the mouth and get rid of whatever teeth are occupying his stenchy piehole.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kenneth_Lay

# 1985: Enron formed by merger of Houston Natural Gas and InterNorth
# 1990: Chairman of the board and chief executive officer, Enron co-chairman, organizing committee for G-7 summit
# 1992: Co-chairman, President Bush Re-election Committee chairman, 1992 Republican National Convention, Houston
# 1992: Assists with campaign of Sheila Jackson-Lee to defeat Congressman Craig Washington
# 2001: Jeffrey Skilling becomes CEO of Enron for a few months
# 2002: Amid extreme pressure, Lay resigns as Enron CEO, leaves board


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PassingFair Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-22-06 03:03 PM
Response to Original message
22. I had to REALLY DIG for this, but I KNEW it would come in handy...
Edited on Mon May-22-06 03:04 PM by PassingFair
someday. Enjoy:

As usual, the culprit was the Repiglican congress (surprise):


In 1995 a law shielding outside accountants, law firms,
CEO's and Directors from liabilities for FALSE CORPORATE
REPORTING was passed OVER CLINTON'S VETO.

The same year, they froze the SEC budget.

The SAME YEAR,
Clinton's SEC Chief, Arthur Levitt, proposed barring accounting firms from
consulting for the very firms they were auditing. The lobbyist who
spearheaded the accounting industries campaign against the Levitt Proposal
was none other than Harvey Pitt,

BUSH'S PICK FOR HEAD OF THE SEC.

Read up on Harvey Pitt.

Tell your freeper that the puke congress set the system up
to rip-off upon the ascension of the Chimperor.

Make sure he knows that the apparatus to steal was erected
by the PUKE CONGRESS, over Clinton's EXPRESS VETO.

You may send this to him as is, if you want!

:hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
azmouse Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-22-06 03:17 PM
Response to Reply #22
24. Thanks for the info.
This is good stuff! :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PassingFair Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-22-06 03:50 PM
Response to Reply #24
26. The crap they PRINTED
I surprised BushCo didn't bring him back from obscurity.
They felt he was a hot potato at the time.
They have grown stronger, much stronger and bolder since then.

http://www.usatoday.com/money/companies/regulation/2002-11-05-pitt-resigns_x.htm
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EC Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-22-06 03:50 PM
Response to Original message
25. Go back in history when Bush was govenor and how
Edited on Mon May-22-06 04:01 PM by EC
he helped Kenny Boy with deregulation etc. in Texas...had nothing to do with who was Pres. but who was Gov of Texas had everything to do with it...


http://www.thenation.com/blogs/capitalgames?bid=3&pid=21


http://www.yuricareport.com/PoliticalAnalysis/FraudinWhiteHouse.htm
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dora Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-22-06 03:52 PM
Response to Original message
27. Sherron Watkins was the Enron whistleblower, not the SEC.
:eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
libhill Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-23-06 09:45 AM
Response to Original message
30. How about
it's all over for you repuke mfrs, so get a life and give it a rest...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ganja Ninja Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-23-06 10:25 AM
Response to Original message
31. Didn't Bush use the Enron corporate jet for campaign 2000?
And didn't Ken Lay donate 3 dollars to republican's for every dollar he gave to a democrat?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 08:26 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC