Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Let us go forth and multiply! OR yet another reason for R vs. W

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
 
sproutster Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-12-06 11:25 PM
Original message
Let us go forth and multiply! OR yet another reason for R vs. W
http://www.midtod.com/fertility.phtml

Getting pregnant through the use of fertility techniques is not a sure thing. Only about 20% of women undergoing such therapy will get pregnant in a given month. Many have to go back again and again.
Nevertheless, in the last two decades, there has been a marked increase in the number of multiple births in the United States. In 1971, there were 1,034 births involving three or more children. By 1994, that number had jumped to 4,594.

The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention attributes the number to older women trying to get pregnant with the help of fertility techniques after delaying pregnancy for years.

Of overriding concern, say ethicists, should be that being pregnant with so many babies forces women to make difficult moral and ethical decisions.

"They have to choose between three conflicting values -- their own health, in having to carry so many fetuses; the health of their fetuses; and the moral values of whether or not you have to abort one or more of those fetuses," said Larry Gostin of Georgetown University.

Doctors say the healthy McCaughey septuplets were the exception rather than the rule. Many premature babies, such as the Houston octuplets, are much smaller and face grave dangers.

And, says Gostin, "Many of these children are going to have profound handicaps throughout their lives -- both physical and mental handicaps."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
CornField Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-12-06 11:27 PM
Response to Original message
1. Not even the McCaughey septuplets were "healthy"
I believe at least two (if not more) have on-going health problems.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Djinn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-12-06 11:40 PM
Response to Original message
2. don't know if this is a "reason" for R v W
it's a reason to look seriously at the ethics surrounding assisted fertility, not really sure it relates to abortion being legal
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sproutster Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-12-06 11:50 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. A woman does not have to make a decision when facing multiple births?
Are you serious? Not only is it relevant, it's something that fundie women might actually believe they might face.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Djinn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-13-06 12:12 AM
Response to Reply #3
4. well actually if they're consistent fundies
they wouldn't be having fertility treatment, also if they're consistent they would never have a termination regardless of the risk to their health, so why is it something they might face?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 05:53 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC