Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

The Big Dog's on Nightline tonight

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
 
TacticalPeek Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-12-06 11:45 PM
Original message
The Big Dog's on Nightline tonight
Thursday on Nightline

Terry Moran interviews former President Bill Clinton in Harlem -- only on Nightline.

http://abcnews.go.com/Nightline/


Justa headsup.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Catherine Vincent Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-12-06 11:46 PM
Response to Original message
1. Thanks for letting us know.
I always have time for Big Dog.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
napi21 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-12-06 11:53 PM
Response to Original message
2. Oh my God! A President who actually answers the question that was asked!
It's been so long since that happened, I forgot what it sounded like!

Hell, he even pronnounced all the words right!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CottonBear Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-13-06 12:00 AM
Response to Reply #2
3. A president who can speak in complete sentances with logic & compassion!
Ruh Roh. Moran just asked "What's it like to live w/ the frontrunner for the Dem Pres in 2008?"

"I'm a cheerleader..." he's not giving anything away.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Scout Finch Donating Member (82 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-13-06 12:12 AM
Response to Reply #2
6. It all depends on what "is" is.
Sorry. Your post was just begging for that famous line!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
A-Schwarzenegger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-13-06 02:16 AM
Response to Reply #6
17. Another "RW talking point" from you.
Sorry. Your post was just begging for that famous line!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Algorem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-13-06 12:02 AM
Response to Original message
4. says golly I sure don't know if Bush is allowed to spy on whoever he
wants whenever he wants, we'll just have to wait for the Supreme Court to decide. That's just fucking great.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wiley Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-13-06 12:09 AM
Response to Original message
5. The Big Dog rocks!
Considering the outrageous disregard for everything decent and just in America by CORRUPT REPUBLICANS, why didn't we push for a third term for Clinton? He makes me feel like we do have a world class leader who respects and understands the American people and the good that we could do in the world. What a class act!

:dem:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Algorem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-13-06 12:44 AM
Response to Original message
7. so it doesn't bug anyone that Clinton doesn't mind Bush bugging everyone?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
fenderpuddy Donating Member (1 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-13-06 12:47 AM
Response to Reply #7
8. probably because...
Clinton did the same thing... called the Echelon program. Wake up, it's been done before.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Algorem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-13-06 12:49 AM
Response to Reply #8
9. Bullshit.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
seabeyond Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-13-06 12:54 AM
Response to Reply #8
10. i dont believe you are tellling the whole story, now are you
Edited on Fri Jan-13-06 12:55 AM by seabeyond
what repugs do. they just say a bit and let it be their truth. you should be offended by your lawless bush. it is yours and all your futures that are being effected too. but you are more into a party fight, than a fight for the u.s. and our constitution. why dont you love america?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rainscents Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-13-06 01:00 AM
Response to Reply #8
11. Link???
Edited on Fri Jan-13-06 01:00 AM by Rainscents
Show me??? I want the link to what you say is true! Show me the proof???
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
yodermon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-13-06 01:48 AM
Response to Reply #11
15. Wow! Echelon! I'd forgotten all about that one!
Here is Bob Barr in the Congressional Record on 5/13/1999:
http://frwebgate3.access.gpo.gov/cgi-bin/waisgate.cgi?WAISdocID=1366061094+0+0+0&WAISaction=retrieve

He is proposing an amendment to the INTELLIGENCE AUTHORIZATION ACT FOR FISCAL YEAR 2000.

<snip>
In particular, the gentleman from Florida (Chairman Goss) was seeking
very important information that goes to the standards whereby the
intelligence community and the agencies comprising the intelligence
community gather intelligence and gather information on American
citizens.
One such project in particular that has recently come to light, Mr.
Chairman, is a project known as Project Echelon, which has been in
place for several years and which, by accounts that we have recently
seen in the media, engages in the intercession of literally millions of
communications involving United States citizens over satellite
transmissions, involving e-mail transmissions, Internet access, as
well as mobile phone communications and telephone communications.

This information apparently is shared, at least in part, and
coordinated, at least in part, with intelligence agencies of four other
countries: the UK, Canada, New Zealand, and Australia.
As part of our effort here in the Congress, both on the Select
Committee on Intelligence, which the gentleman from Florida (Mr. Goss)
chairs, as well as others of us, while not serving on that committee,
are concerned about the privacy rights for American citizens and
whether or not there are constitutional safeguards being circumvented
by the manner in which the intelligence agencies are intercepting and/
or receiving international communications back from foreign nations
that would otherwise be prohibited by the prohibitions and the
limitations on the collection of domestic intelligence.
We have been trying to get information with regard to Project Echelon
and others.
The amendment that I propose today simply would require the
intelligence community, and that is specifically the Department of
Justice, the National Security Agency, and the CIA to provide to the
Congress within 60 days of the enactment this Intelligence
Authorization Act a report setting forth the legal basis and procedures
whereby the intelligence community and the agencies comprising
intelligence community gather intelligence.
This will enable the intelligence community and the Committee on the
Judiciary of both Houses to properly evaluate whether or not these
procedures are being implemented properly according to proper legal and
constitutional standards.
It would be very interesting to see, Mr. Chairman, if the
administration or the Senate opposes this very straightforward
amendment, which simply requires a report on the legal basis for such
interceptions to be furnished within 60 days to the Select Committee on
Intelligence of both Houses and to the Committee on the Judiciary of
both Houses.
I ask Members on both sides of the aisle to support this very
straightforward amendment, which not only will help guarantee the
privacy rights for American citizens, but will protect the oversight
responsibilities of the Congress which are now under assault by these
bogus claims that the intelligence communities are making. I ask for
the adoption of the amendment.<snip>


Very interesting reading esp. in light of shrub's wiretaps, and Barr's criticism of them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
txindy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-13-06 01:24 AM
Response to Reply #8
12. That was quick.
Enjoy the tombstone. :hi:

:rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
fooj Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-13-06 01:27 AM
Response to Reply #12
13. Poof!
:toast:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
oasis Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-13-06 02:11 AM
Response to Reply #13
16. kick for BC.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Horse with no Name Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-13-06 02:20 AM
Response to Reply #8
18. All that work to sign up
And you couldn't even hold your tongue long enough to post twice.
:rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
flumox Donating Member (1 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-14-06 01:47 PM
Response to Reply #18
19. approach with an open mind, not preconceived notions
Your responses are interesting... a profane, one word response...and accusation that I am a republican. As I said before wake up. How about a little open minded intellectual discussion, not the closed minded, simple thinking attacks you have just levied.

The PROOF you asked for:

======================================================================

Source:Investor's Business Daily www.investors.com January 4, 2006 Wednesday

But such surveillance was not always so limited in scope and purpose. In the 1990 s, under the administration of William Jefferson Clinton, the NSA monitored millions of private phone calls placed by U.S. citizens and citizens of other countries under a super secret program code-named Echelon.

In a February 2000 story on CBS' "60 Minutes," correspondent Steve Kroft introduced the piece on the Clinton-era spy program by saying: "If you've made a phone call today or sent an e-mail to a friend, there's a good chance that what you said or wrote was captured or screened by the country's largest intelligence agency."

One Echelon operator in Britain told "60 Minutes" that it had even monitored and tape-recorded the conversations of the late Sen. Strom Thurmond.

Echelon, in other words, was truly a secret program that spied on Americans...

Source: From BBC Nov. 1999 - http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/503224.stm
Both Britain and America deny allegations like this, though they refuse to comment further. But one former US army intelligence officer has broken the code of silence.

Colonel Dan Smith told the BBC that while this is feasible, it is not official policy: "Technically they can scoop all this information up, sort through it, and find what it is that might be asked for," he said. "But there is no policy to do this specifically in response to a particular company's interests."

Legislators on both sides of the Atlantic are beginning to sit up and take notice. Republican Congressman Bob Barr has persuaded congress to open hearings into these and other allegations.

In December he is coming to Britain to raise awareness of the issue. In an interview with the BBC he accused the NSA of conducting a broad "dragnet" of communications, and "invading the privacy of American citizens."

He is joined in his concerns by a small number of politicians In Britain. Liberal Democrat MP Norman Baker has tabled a series of questions about Menwith Hill, but has been met with a wall of silence.

Source: http://fly.hiwaay.net/~pspoole/echelon.html
To accommodate the need for information regarding international commercial deals, the intelligence agencies set up a small, unpublicized department within the Department of Commerce, the Office of Intelligence Liaison. This office receives intelligence reports from the US intelligence agencies about pending international deals that it discreetly forwards to companies that request it or may have an interest in the information. Immediately after coming to office in January 1993, President Clinton added to the corporate espionage machine by creating the National Economic Council, which feeds intelligence to “select” companies to enhance US competitiveness. The capabilities of ECHELON to spy on foreign companies is nothing new, but the Clinton administration has raised its use to an art:

In 1990 the German magazine Der Speigel revealed that the NSA had intercepted messages about an impending $200 million deal between Indonesia and the Japanese satellite manufacturer NEC Corp. After President Bush intervened in the negotiations on behalf of American manufacturers, the contract was split between NEC and AT&T.
In 1994, the CIA and NSA intercepted phone calls between Brazilian officials and the French firm Thomson-CSF about a radar system that the Brazilians wanted to purchase. A US firm, Raytheon, was a competitor as well, and reports prepared from intercepts were forwarded to Raytheon.<55>
In September 1993, President Clinton asked the CIA to spy on Japanese auto manufacturers that were designing zero-emission cars and to forward that information to the Big Three US car manufacturers: Ford, General Motors and Chrysler.<56> In 1995, the New York Times reported that the NSA and the CIA’s Tokyo station were involved in providing detailed information to US Trade Representative Mickey Kantor’s team of negotiators in Geneva facing Japanese car companies in a trade dispute.<57> Recently, a Japanese newspaper, Mainichi, accused the NSA of continuing to monitor the communications of Japanese companies on behalf of American companies.<58>
Insight Magazine reported in a series of articles in 1997 that President Clinton ordered the NSA and FBI to mount a massive surveillance operation at the 1993 Asian/Pacific Economic Conference (APEC) hosted in Seattle. One intelligence source for the story related that over 300 hotel rooms had been bugged for the event, which was designed to obtain information regarding oil and hydro-electric deals pending in Vietnam that were passed on to high level Democratic Party contributors competing for the contracts.<59> But foreign companies were not the only losers: when Vietnam expressed interest in purchasing two used 737 freighter aircraft from an American businessman, the deal was scuttled after Commerce Secretary Ron Brown arranged favorable financing for two new 737s from Boeing.<60>

===========================================

In all honesty, it might help to be a little more open minded... free thinking. Don't always have a canned response to what you think the truth is. Be more accepting to alternative viewpoints, and don't stereotype people because they might present new ideas.

That's really not that hard to do... is it?
Have a nice day... :hi: I'm going for a long walk on the beach with my beautiful wife. It is a good day.
Dr. Truth (aka fenderpuddy)


"First they ignore you, then they laugh at you, then they fight you, then you win." - Gandhi
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Catherine Vincent Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-13-06 01:29 AM
Response to Original message
14. Are we extra busy tonight?
I can't see any posted pics.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 04:33 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC