|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) |
benburch (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon May-22-06 10:40 PM Original message |
Malloy says Rove likely HAS been indicted. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
yodermon (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon May-22-06 10:42 PM Response to Original message |
1. wha? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Cetacea (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon May-22-06 10:44 PM Response to Reply #1 |
6. He said IF true... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
babylonsister (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon May-22-06 10:42 PM Response to Original message |
2. OMG! Trouthout couldn't be right, could they? Nah. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
hlthe2b (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon May-22-06 10:42 PM Response to Original message |
3. It has been hypothesized.... What was Malloy's source? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
benburch (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon May-22-06 10:44 PM Response to Reply #3 |
5. That there was an indctment in "Sealed v Sealed"... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Leopolds Ghost (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-23-06 04:35 AM Response to Reply #5 |
36. I thought... The judge is not Fitzgerald's boss, Gonzales is. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Kostafarian (66 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-23-06 04:47 AM Response to Reply #5 |
37. Not even close |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Name removed (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-23-06 06:22 AM Response to Reply #37 |
42. Deleted message |
KittyWampus (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-23-06 07:16 AM Response to Reply #42 |
46. "Nutcase"? Suggesting Leopold, Pitt & Ash are "nutcases" is unwarranted |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Catrina (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-23-06 11:03 AM Response to Reply #37 |
72. Sealed V Sealed is NOT a figment of Madsen's imagination. Here's a |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JuniperLea (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-23-06 01:46 PM Response to Reply #37 |
93. Figment? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Jersey Devil (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-23-06 07:21 AM Response to Reply #5 |
47. The renowned JiggyFlunknut Theory arises yet again!! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
KittyWampus (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-23-06 07:15 AM Response to Reply #3 |
45. Malloys "Source" Is Wayne Madsen Filtered Through Some Fool On DKos |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
stop the bleeding (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon May-22-06 10:44 PM Response to Original message |
4. what makes him believe this - pure conjecture or something more? n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Scoody Boo (634 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon May-22-06 10:50 PM Response to Reply #4 |
9. Yeah, lets all line up and get kicked in the head again. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
benburch (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon May-22-06 10:45 PM Response to Original message |
7. If you want to hear what he actually said rather than my recollection... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Maddy McCall (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon May-22-06 10:46 PM Response to Original message |
8. This is, what, the third or fourth thread on this topic. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
benburch (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon May-22-06 10:50 PM Response to Reply #8 |
10. Pardon me for not reading ALL of DU! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Maddy McCall (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon May-22-06 10:52 PM Response to Reply #10 |
12. Didn't mean to jump your case about it... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
benburch (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon May-22-06 10:54 PM Response to Reply #12 |
13. No prob... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TahitiNut (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon May-22-06 10:54 PM Response to Reply #10 |
14. Well, if everyone read instead of posted ... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
benburch (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon May-22-06 11:00 PM Response to Reply #14 |
19. Because then 100% of all messages would be from... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cliss (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon May-22-06 11:38 PM Response to Reply #19 |
29. So what's the big fuss about? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TahitiNut (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-23-06 07:34 AM Response to Reply #19 |
48. Yep. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
upi402 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-23-06 11:55 PM Response to Reply #19 |
134. you can have my clothes, I'll lend ya some bolts anytime |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Just Me (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon May-22-06 11:01 PM Response to Reply #14 |
20. I'm not a speed reader. It would be nice if others would just,... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Laurab (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-23-06 11:06 AM Response to Reply #20 |
73. Me TOO |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Pacifist Patriot (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-23-06 07:36 AM Response to Reply #10 |
49. I got the same when I posted something the other day. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Just Me (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon May-22-06 10:55 PM Response to Reply #8 |
15. Oh, C'MON!!! Chill!!! Not everyone's on DU 24/7 like you. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Just Me (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon May-22-06 10:51 PM Response to Original message |
11. Well, I wish it were true 'cause Karl would squeal like a baby,... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Scoody Boo (634 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon May-22-06 10:58 PM Response to Reply #11 |
17. He won't turn on anyone on a perjury indictment... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
benburch (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon May-22-06 11:03 PM Response to Reply #17 |
21. I can't fault that logic. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
thereismore (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon May-22-06 11:23 PM Response to Reply #21 |
27. I like your avatar. It took me a long time, but now I've |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
benburch (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon May-22-06 11:57 PM Response to Reply #27 |
32. I hope I have even a fraction of her bravery. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DemReadingDU (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-23-06 09:30 AM Response to Reply #32 |
54. I have wondered a long time too, but haven't |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
thereismore (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-23-06 09:38 AM Response to Reply #54 |
56. Her name is Sophie Scholl. Google time! nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DemReadingDU (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-23-06 10:53 AM Response to Reply #56 |
68. Thank you! An inspiration for all of us |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BrklynLiberal (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-23-06 11:54 AM Response to Reply #56 |
81. Goosebump time. What an incredilbly brave woman. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Just Me (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-23-06 08:47 PM Response to Reply #56 |
130. 21 years old --- immediate execution for expressing a faux freedom,... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Sydnie (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon May-22-06 11:04 PM Response to Reply #17 |
23. How is that? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Scoody Boo (634 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon May-22-06 11:15 PM Response to Reply #23 |
26. Because of the fact that there is no underlying crime. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Bolo Boffin (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon May-22-06 11:54 PM Response to Reply #26 |
31. Perjury is a standalone crime. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Scoody Boo (634 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-23-06 08:23 AM Response to Reply #31 |
51. I have never said any different... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Catrina (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-23-06 10:06 AM Response to Reply #51 |
60. You couldn't be more wrong ~ a crime was committed. If the crime |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
elehhhhna (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-23-06 10:33 AM Response to Reply #51 |
66. I thought we laid that Freep argument to rest LONG ago. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Scoody Boo (634 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-23-06 12:10 PM Response to Reply #66 |
83. I have not been here that long. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DoYouEverWonder (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed May-24-06 05:44 AM Response to Reply #66 |
139. Some freeps |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
hang a left (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-23-06 12:07 AM Response to Reply #26 |
35. Puleeze..... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Garbo 2004 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-23-06 01:13 PM Response to Reply #35 |
89. Actually max sentence for Libby if found guilty on all charges: 30 years. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
hang a left (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-23-06 07:28 PM Response to Reply #89 |
111. Thank you. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Seabiscuit (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-23-06 06:34 AM Response to Reply #26 |
43. If Clinton had been prosecuted and tried for perjury as a result |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Usrename (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-23-06 08:31 AM Response to Reply #43 |
52. I think the Martha Stewart case is a better analogy. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Seabiscuit (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-23-06 02:07 PM Response to Reply #52 |
97. True. But I was just attempting to illustrate with a hypo. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Usrename (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-23-06 03:04 PM Response to Reply #97 |
104. It wasn't perjury. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Catrina (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-23-06 10:18 AM Response to Reply #43 |
62. You're right and Libby's lawyers have already tried that in court and |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Fovea (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-23-06 09:34 AM Response to Reply #26 |
55. Consider Watergate |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
coalition_unwilling (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-23-06 11:09 AM Response to Reply #55 |
74. "It wasn't the break-in ... it was the cover up" . . . |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Fovea (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-23-06 01:57 PM Response to Reply #74 |
96. Your point is valid |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
coalition_unwilling (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-23-06 07:05 PM Response to Reply #96 |
109. Indeed, one could argue that the "outing" of Valerie Plame |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Catrina (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-23-06 09:55 AM Response to Reply #26 |
58. I think you need to start following the pre-trial motions in the Libby |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Just Me (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-23-06 08:16 PM Response to Reply #26 |
129. FALSE. There is an "underlying crime" of the worst variety. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
PaganPreacher (653 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon May-22-06 11:58 PM Response to Reply #23 |
33. Fitzgerald can't indict anyone (not even a ham sandwich). |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Scoody Boo (634 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-23-06 12:04 AM Response to Reply #33 |
34. Whatever comes down... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Seabiscuit (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-23-06 06:39 AM Response to Reply #34 |
44. You keep saying that because you haven't read posts 35 & 43 yet. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Catrina (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-23-06 10:21 AM Response to Reply #34 |
63. Wrong again ~ it seems just the threat of perjury has provided the |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DoYouEverWonder (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-23-06 05:20 AM Response to Reply #33 |
38. Except that Fitzgerald has an exceptional track record |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
PaganPreacher (653 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-23-06 11:09 PM Response to Reply #38 |
132. Fitz' track record has nothing to do with it. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Just Me (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-23-06 08:54 PM Response to Reply #33 |
131. Well, if not bought, bribed, pr/icked and manipulated, justice may,... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Alamom (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-23-06 05:59 AM Response to Reply #17 |
41. It's not over.... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Gregorian (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon May-22-06 10:56 PM Response to Original message |
16. But there is no Sealed v Sealed on the 2006 records. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Sydnie (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-23-06 08:04 AM Response to Reply #16 |
50. As for the sealed vs sealed, TalkLeft posted this |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
onenote (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-23-06 10:58 AM Response to Reply #50 |
71. well, that's too much assuming for me |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
survivor999 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon May-22-06 10:58 PM Response to Original message |
18. If it's sealed... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DoYouEverWonder (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-23-06 05:22 AM Response to Reply #18 |
39. When the judge feels like it |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
coalition_unwilling (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-23-06 11:21 AM Response to Reply #39 |
76. I thought I remember reading somewhere that back when the |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DoYouEverWonder (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-23-06 11:31 AM Response to Reply #76 |
78. No |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
corbett (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-23-06 07:33 PM Response to Reply #76 |
113. No, I Remember That, Too (n/t) |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TheFarseer (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon May-22-06 11:03 PM Response to Original message |
22. I'm not going to buy that |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MarchDancer (2 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon May-22-06 11:09 PM Response to Original message |
24. Rove - Indicted or Not? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Garbo 2004 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon May-22-06 11:14 PM Response to Original message |
25. For background you might want to look at this thread. The famed |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
H2O Man (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-23-06 05:30 AM Response to Reply #25 |
40. I would suggest |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Zorra (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-23-06 10:27 AM Response to Reply #40 |
65. Here's mine: |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Garbo 2004 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-23-06 01:08 PM Response to Reply #65 |
88. 1. Grand jury indicts not Fitz. 2. The Kos "theory" claims Rove indicted. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Swamp Rat (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon May-22-06 11:28 PM Response to Original message |
28. I hope so |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MuseRider (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon May-22-06 11:44 PM Response to Reply #28 |
30. My exact thoughts. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
0007 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-23-06 08:48 AM Response to Original message |
53. I absolutely believe that Rove has been indicted. I also have |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Sammy Pepys (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-23-06 09:39 AM Response to Original message |
57. Ugh..... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ContraBass Black (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-23-06 10:08 AM Response to Reply #57 |
61. Indictments don't have dates on them. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Sammy Pepys (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-23-06 10:23 AM Response to Reply #61 |
64. Well, truthout has been claiming... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Catrina (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-23-06 11:53 AM Response to Reply #64 |
80. Indictments when they are unsealed do show the date they were filed |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Snivi Yllom (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-23-06 12:15 PM Response to Reply #80 |
84. 2 points |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
onenote (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-23-06 01:19 PM Response to Reply #84 |
91. yep. Here's an example of a sealed indictment |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Jazz2006 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-23-06 07:43 PM Response to Reply #91 |
116. Good find, onenote. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Dunedain (335 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed May-24-06 12:55 AM Response to Reply #116 |
136. Once an indictment is filed..... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Jazz2006 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed May-24-06 03:52 AM Response to Reply #136 |
137. To answer those four questions in order.... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Dunedain (335 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu May-25-06 10:55 AM Response to Reply #137 |
148. Thanks |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Norquist Nemesis (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-23-06 09:59 AM Response to Original message |
59. It's really odd that Luskin isn't chatting away with reporters anymore |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sendero (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-23-06 12:20 PM Response to Reply #59 |
85. This is exactly why.. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Freddie Stubbs (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-23-06 10:39 AM Response to Original message |
67. To be unsealed on June 7? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Snivi Yllom (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-23-06 10:57 AM Response to Original message |
69. if the indictment was sealed, Rove would not know he was indicted |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Catrina (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-23-06 11:12 AM Response to Reply #69 |
75. Not necessarily. The prosecutor can get permission to tell the target |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Snivi Yllom (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-23-06 11:21 AM Response to Reply #75 |
77. but then the indictement is no longer sealed |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Catrina (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-23-06 11:42 AM Response to Reply #77 |
79. True, but why would Rove do that? The benefit of telling the target |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Snivi Yllom (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-23-06 11:59 AM Response to Reply #79 |
82. you miss the point, if you tell the target he's indicted, it's not sealed |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Catrina (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-23-06 01:01 PM Response to Reply #82 |
86. No, the indictment remains sealed ~ all the prosecutor does is tell |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Snivi Yllom (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-23-06 01:19 PM Response to Reply #86 |
90. It's not sealed if Rove knows about it |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
dogday (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-23-06 01:42 PM Response to Reply #90 |
92. How about this |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Catrina (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-23-06 02:21 PM Response to Reply #92 |
99. Thanks dogday ~ so even if Fitzgerald has told Rove about any |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
dogday (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-23-06 02:24 PM Response to Reply #99 |
102. Why make it sealed |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Jazz2006 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-23-06 07:24 PM Response to Reply #92 |
110. You have to read the Rule and the exceptions more carefully... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Garbo 2004 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-23-06 01:50 PM Response to Reply #86 |
94. My understanding is that an indictment, whether sealed or not, can't |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Catrina (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-23-06 02:17 PM Response to Reply #94 |
98. You are probably right. Once something is filed in court it does have to |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Jazz2006 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-23-06 07:28 PM Response to Reply #94 |
112. That is correct, Garbo. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JuniperLea (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-23-06 01:51 PM Response to Reply #82 |
95. No, you miss the point |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Jazz2006 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-23-06 07:35 PM Response to Reply #95 |
114. Close, but not exactly. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
dogday (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-23-06 07:41 PM Response to Reply #114 |
115. Indictments don't necessarily mean arrests |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Jazz2006 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-23-06 07:43 PM Response to Reply #115 |
117. It does when it is served. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
dogday (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-23-06 07:45 PM Response to Reply #117 |
118. It still does not apply |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Jazz2006 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-23-06 07:50 PM Response to Reply #118 |
121. In an alternate universe, perhaps. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
dogday (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-23-06 07:52 PM Response to Reply #121 |
122. My World is just as real as yours |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Jazz2006 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-23-06 08:00 PM Response to Reply #122 |
125. Well yes, you did reference things... but as noted above |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
dogday (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed May-24-06 07:04 AM Response to Reply #125 |
142. I used more than one reference |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Jazz2006 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed May-24-06 11:36 AM Response to Reply #142 |
144. As I said, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
dogday (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed May-24-06 12:56 PM Response to Reply #144 |
146. The prosecutor can inform the Attorney |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Jazz2006 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed May-24-06 01:54 PM Response to Reply #146 |
147. I am well aware of what can and cannot be done |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Catherine Vincent (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-23-06 07:48 PM Response to Reply #117 |
119. I don't mean to butt in but remember Libby was indicted but he wasn't |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Jazz2006 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-23-06 07:54 PM Response to Reply #119 |
124. It's not butting in ~ |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Catherine Vincent (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-23-06 08:03 PM Response to Reply #124 |
126. I just didn't want to get yelled at for being a buttinski. :) |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Jazz2006 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-23-06 08:09 PM Response to Reply #126 |
128. No worries in that regard from me :) |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Cetacea (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-23-06 11:27 PM Response to Reply #126 |
133. Hello Cat_girl25 |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Beelzebud (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-23-06 10:58 AM Response to Original message |
70. I'm tired of the whole fucking mess.. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DemforNagin (33 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-23-06 01:04 PM Response to Original message |
87. Ho boy... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Name removed (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-23-06 02:21 PM Response to Reply #87 |
100. Deleted message |
DS1 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-23-06 02:22 PM Response to Reply #100 |
101. How pleasant! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Catrina (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-23-06 02:24 PM Response to Reply #100 |
103. *rotfl* ~ cat_girl25 |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Catherine Vincent (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-23-06 03:22 PM Response to Reply #103 |
106. Yep! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
dogday (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-23-06 03:23 PM Response to Reply #103 |
107. That is what I have been trying to do |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DoYouEverWonder (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-23-06 03:08 PM Response to Reply #87 |
105. This is a discussion board |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Kingofalldems (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-23-06 03:57 PM Response to Reply #87 |
108. Oh boy! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sheelz (869 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-23-06 08:08 PM Response to Reply #87 |
127. Welcome to DU! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
savemefromdumbya (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-23-06 07:49 PM Response to Original message |
120. 'No smoke without fire' though |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Rex (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-23-06 07:54 PM Response to Original message |
123. Well well |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
garybeck (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed May-24-06 12:18 AM Response to Original message |
135. sealed vs. sealed...... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Jazz2006 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed May-24-06 04:13 AM Response to Reply #135 |
138. Neither makes any sense.... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DoYouEverWonder (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed May-24-06 05:49 AM Response to Reply #138 |
140. Nixon was unindicted |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Jazz2006 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed May-24-06 11:32 AM Response to Reply #140 |
143. Eh? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Freddie Stubbs (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed May-24-06 06:36 AM Response to Original message |
141. How does he know? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Cetacea (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed May-24-06 11:42 AM Response to Reply #141 |
145. He never said he did know... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Mon May 13th 2024, 04:53 AM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC