Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Where's all the "Jefferson must resign threads"?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
 
CatWoman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-23-06 09:40 AM
Original message
Where's all the "Jefferson must resign threads"?
I know he didn't do something as awful as hit a cop with his cell phone, but come on now.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
JPZenger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-23-06 09:41 AM
Response to Original message
1. Give him the heave ho
The Dems must not tolerate corruption or we will not have the ability to attack the Repubs for it.

I imagine Livingston is from a solidly Dem district, so we don't even have to worry about losing the seat.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CatWoman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-23-06 09:44 AM
Response to Reply #1
7. I agree
I can't get over the nerve of the guy.

$90K found in his freezer, yet he's still yelling "innocent"?

That dog don't hunt.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
enough already Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-23-06 10:42 AM
Response to Reply #1
36. So he doesn't get a day in court?
Great. Don't take a good man at his word, just toss him out on his ass because the Republicans and the media are making a big deal of it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TwilightZone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-23-06 09:43 AM
Response to Original message
2. Here's a poll:
Edited on Tue May-23-06 09:46 AM by TwilightZone
http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=364x1259733

Pretty definitive.

Edit: if nearly everyone (95%, in that poll) agrees, there would seem to be little need for extended discussion.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CatWoman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-23-06 09:46 AM
Response to Reply #2
11. sorry didn't see that thread
and if we can have a ga zillion Truthout Threads, one more Jefferson thread won't hurt.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TwilightZone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-23-06 09:47 AM
Response to Reply #11
13. Sorry, didn't mean your thread.
My "like this one" was intended to point out the poll thread, not comment on yours.

Edited to clarify.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sinkingfeeling Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-23-06 09:44 AM
Response to Original message
3. If guilty, he must go. Looks pretty bad since they have him on tape.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
goclark Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-23-06 10:02 AM
Response to Reply #3
25. If guilty, kick him out and send him to JAIL!


Don't pass go, straight to JAIL!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
napi21 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-23-06 09:44 AM
Response to Original message
4. Well, I'LL join this one! I say son't AKS him to resign, TELL HIM!
Surely there's enough power in the Dem Party to be able to do that!

We MUST show total intolerance of corruption!!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kagemusha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-23-06 09:44 AM
Response to Original message
5. People stick their "must resign" comments in other threads
that's all.

It's getting drowned out by outrage over, well, how dare you raid a congressman's office, it's just not done, who cares a judge signed the warrant, it's JUST NOT DONE, separation of powers, it's a DEM, how dare you, have you no shame, have you no shame!

...etc.

Given that sentiment here on DU, I doubt a serious "must resign" thread can get any momentum. Besides, he's a Democrat. Opposing him probably violates DU rules.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kestrel91316 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-23-06 10:42 AM
Response to Reply #5
37. As long as he is treated fairly and there is not some sort of double
standard where Dems don't get true justice and Reps get a pass, then I say give him the boot.

But I have come to the conclusion over the past 5 1/2 years that anything and everything is legal if you are a Republican, and that the letter of every single law, no matter how trivial, must be obeyed if you are a Democrat.

Equal protection under the law and all that.........
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cmd Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-23-06 09:44 AM
Response to Original message
6. I cannot defend him.
It's hard to ignor someone with a cookie jar stuck on their hand. It's time for Jefferson to go.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sgent Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-23-06 09:45 AM
Response to Original message
8. I posted in another thread
that Pelosi should introduce a resolution to kick him out of his seat. This requires 2/3 vote of the House, and would put the republicans on the defensiv. They either agree to the measure, and then look like the party of corruption for supporting Cunningham & Delay for so long, or disagree and get pinned with keeping such an idiot in office (it would also allow the D's to recruit another candidate).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CatWoman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-23-06 09:45 AM
Response to Reply #8
9. that's an excellent idea
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SoFlaJet Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-23-06 09:47 AM
Response to Reply #8
14. That IS smart
then we can ask where are the republicans on this?Why isn't Bob Ney gone yet?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TygrBright Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-23-06 10:00 AM
Response to Reply #8
24. Yup. Don't wait for him to resign.
BOOT the barstid. Give him a chance to come up with EVIDENCE that the $90K in his freezer and the recorded phone calls have a credible, innocent reason, and if he can't do that, chuck him out. It is OK to hold our elected reps to a higher standard than "innocent until proven guilty." Our elected reps must not only avoid dishonesty, they must avoid the APPEARANCE of dishonesty, as it is their responsibility to maintain citizens' confidence in the honesty of the system.

BOOT the barstid.

adamantly,
Bright
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
davepc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-23-06 10:38 AM
Response to Reply #8
35. He hasn't been convicted of anything yet....
and that would set a bad precedent.

All's you would have to do is frame somebody with some charges and call try to get the house to vote on expulsion while crying "we did it with Jefferson in 06!".

He needs to be leaned on HEAVILY by the party leadership to step down.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sgent Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-23-06 11:09 AM
Response to Reply #35
40. On a scale of 1 to videotaped on television
Edited on Tue May-23-06 11:10 AM by Sgent
he is just below videotaped. Our elected reps do not have to be innocent until proven guilty -- the appearance of dishonesty is the legal standard given by the supreme court to restrict campaign finance laws, and its a resonable one here.

Note -- the above refers to them keeping their jobs. Going to jail is a different issue and it should be beyond a reasonable doubt.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SoFlaJet Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-23-06 09:46 AM
Response to Original message
10. The thing about this to me is...
the name William Jefferson-wasn't there a president recently who also had those two names?Curious isn't it-how it comes out now with the GOP is need of some good news?Rule number 2 in their playbook; ALWAYS make Clintons look bad whenever it suits whatever need we have-invoke the name and it's golden..
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CatWoman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-23-06 09:47 AM
Response to Reply #10
12. aw come on
it's just a coincidence that he and BC share the same name(s).

After all, they were both ex-presidents names as well.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SoFlaJet Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-23-06 09:49 AM
Response to Reply #12
15. it doesn't
make you automatically think of William Jefferson Clinton Cat?-it did me...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kagemusha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-23-06 09:51 AM
Response to Reply #15
16. It makes me think of the Eddie Murphy character who won a seat
on the basis of name recognition alone.

The guy he replaced with the same name was white, in that film. I forget the name.

There's a lot of people with "patriotic" names out there. It's no guarantee of virtue, or of vice for that matter.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CatWoman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-23-06 09:54 AM
Response to Reply #15
19. LOL -- I have to admit it does
but still ......... :D
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madinmaryland Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-23-06 09:54 AM
Response to Reply #10
20. I dont recall Clinton stashing $90K in his freezer after
getting caught on camera taking the cash from an undercover agent.

Sorry, but the two people don't belong in the same sentence together.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SoFlaJet Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-23-06 09:59 AM
Response to Reply #20
22. No no no no
I am in no way comparing anything Clinton ever did with Jefferson-I just find it oh ironic I guess how his name is out there NOW almost a year after them finding the "cold cash"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lumberjack_jeff Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-23-06 09:51 AM
Response to Original message
17. I'm not going to defend him, but piling on is the other guys job.
There are plenty of scumbags the capital who also promote shitty policy.

Given the choices: a) persecute a scumbag who represents my interests and, b) persecute a scumbag who doesn't, I'll pick b).

So, how about that Kark Rove?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Scout1071 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-23-06 09:53 AM
Response to Original message
18. We don't need a lot. This one will do.
I think he should resign immediately.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Norquist Nemesis Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-23-06 09:55 AM
Response to Original message
21. I'm convinced this is Tom DeLay's trash
Ole Tom was cleaning out his office and asked Bill to hang on to the leftovers for him.


hee hee
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JNelson6563 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-23-06 10:00 AM
Response to Original message
23. I already posted my view
when the story first broke in LBN. I said he needs to go. Any corrupt politician does.

Julie
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
movonne Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-23-06 10:07 AM
Response to Original message
26. get all the crooks, repugs and dems...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ganja Ninja Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-23-06 10:07 AM
Response to Original message
27. The man should know if he's been caught or not and ...
resign on his own if he's guilty. I don't know what the FBI has on him and the MSM has consistently shown themselves to be unreliable so I can't say one way or the other.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Catherine Vincent Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-23-06 10:07 AM
Response to Original message
28. He should resign.
And of all the luck, his name had to be William Jefferson.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
peekaloo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-23-06 10:07 AM
Response to Original message
29. Hey, he's got Bill Frist on his side regarding the legality of that
FBI search. Whenever he gets his Underoos in a twist ya just know the good Senator will always side with the persecuted victim.

extreme :sarcasm:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
11 Bravo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-23-06 10:08 AM
Response to Original message
30. Here's one, CatWoman.
http://dailykos.com

I agree with you 100% on this. Not only does Jefferson DESERVE to be booted, but in so doing the Dems will clearly illustrate the differences between themselves and the Repugs who are currently using RNC funds to help finance the legal defenses of their numerous miscreants.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ArbustoBuster Donating Member (956 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-23-06 10:08 AM
Response to Original message
31. We're Democrats. Our disgust for corruption is taken as a given.
We consider it perfectly normal, acceptable, and in fact required that a politician who took bribes must be removed from office. It's the Republicans who always feel the need to debate this, because they would lose nine-tenths of their members of Congress if the law were properly applied to them. :)

(I'm not saying you're a Republican by any means! I'm just detailing why I think there's a lot less discussion of Jefferson here at DU than there is on a Republican site in those common occasions where an R were caught with his hand in the cookie jar.)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ContraBass Black Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-23-06 10:11 AM
Response to Original message
32. They came and went yesterday.
There was no DU firestorm, so we're not having an all-out melee and accusing each other of being Freepers (at the moment).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TheFarseer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-23-06 10:15 AM
Response to Original message
33. We've talked about this
unfortunately, there's not much to say. He certainly looks guilty. I hate to see corruption stinking up our party but it does happen and when it does, I don't see any reason why we should support a crook. He's got to resign and I think the democratic leadership might be wise to call for his resignation. That we will lose one seat is not important right now.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LostinVA Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-23-06 10:22 AM
Response to Original message
34. You got it, Catwoman n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jobycom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-23-06 10:48 AM
Response to Original message
38. I'm still waiting for the whole picture.
I know people who keep large amounts of money hidden in their homes for legitimate reasons, and it's hard to trust someone making plea deals for their freedom. It looks bad, but the Republicans and their PR firm (the media) have spun things before to look worse than they are.

Not saying I trust Jefferson, just saying I don't trust the Republicans and their media. I'll wait a bit longer to be absolutely convinced. I'm close, but not there yet.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DS1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-23-06 10:49 AM
Response to Original message
39. Who asked McKinney to resign?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JPZenger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-23-06 12:34 PM
Response to Reply #39
41. She didn't commit a felony
McKinney at worst committed a misdemeanor. There is apparently enough evidence to bring felony charges against Livingston.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed Apr 24th 2024, 01:43 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC