Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

32 pipe bombs, two grenades, seven sawed-off weapons and a machine gun...

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
 
NNN0LHI Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-23-06 02:40 PM
Original message
32 pipe bombs, two grenades, seven sawed-off weapons and a machine gun...
...and no news coverage from the major new outlets. Now if these guys had been some Muslims practicing with paint ball guns that is all we would have heard about for several weeks.

Don

http://www.azcentral.com/news/articles/0520supremacist0520.html

White supremacist gang busted

Gang, weapons, drug crimes alleged

Michael Kiefer
The Arizona Republic
May. 20, 2006 12:00 AM


A self-named White supremacist gang suspected of trafficking in methamphetamine and illegal weapons was the target of a 14-month, multi-agency investigation that culminated in 42 indictments on gang, weapons and drug charges.

Maricopa County Attorney Andrew Thomas announced the indictments Friday, while standing behind some of the confiscated weapons, including a .50 caliber gun that could bring down a police helicopter from a mile away.

The group reportedly called itself AZ 88 Boot Boys and operated mainly in west Phoenix and Glendale. Thomas identified its leader as 40-year-old Todd Streich; 32 of the accused have been arrested.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
MADem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-23-06 02:42 PM
Response to Original message
1. Oh, is THAT all? I thought that was Deadeye Dick's packing list
for his next huntin' and fishin' trip!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
corkhead Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-23-06 02:53 PM
Response to Reply #1
11. Ah! you beat me to it.
I was going to say it was the contents of Snarl's tackle box:toast:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Coexist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-23-06 03:21 PM
Response to Reply #1
28. You are way too fast!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dogday Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-23-06 03:57 PM
Response to Reply #1
38. Did someone say Dead-Eye Dick?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kagemusha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-23-06 02:43 PM
Response to Original message
2. .50 cal isn't necessarily a machinegun.
Not, of course, that it really matters much. Just saying.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ShaneGR Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-23-06 03:10 PM
Response to Reply #2
19. It's not a machine gun, its an auto-loading max power sniper rifle....
So powerful you have to fire them laying down, I know, I had a bruise on my shoulder for a week after I test fired one at a firing range my uncle used to take us to. While it is an autoloader, it's not meant to be fired more than once every maybe 5 secs.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kagemusha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-23-06 03:20 PM
Response to Reply #19
26. Yeah, that'd be the one. Wouldn't want one firing at me.
Dangerous, even if not a machine gun, which is why I said the "automatic fire" part was not really the point anyway.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Squatch Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-23-06 02:44 PM
Response to Original message
3. "a .50 caliber gun that could bring down a police helicopter from..."
"a mile away..."

Hyperbole much?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DS1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-23-06 02:49 PM
Response to Reply #3
5. Someone's been watching too much "SWAT" - the movie
:eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Xenotime Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-24-06 08:48 AM
Response to Reply #5
66. No. It's true.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gratuitous Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-23-06 02:53 PM
Response to Reply #3
9. You're right
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Squatch Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-23-06 04:02 PM
Response to Reply #9
39. What's the lead on a flying target at 1.25 miles?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gratuitous Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-23-06 04:09 PM
Response to Reply #39
42. I dunno, but then I'm not a gun nut
But according to the manufacturer, a .50 caliber rifle has a "maximum effective range" of 2,000 yards. I suppose with a high-powered scope, some practice, and a little luck, an experienced rifleman could nail something as big as a hovering helicopter.

But call it "hyperbole" if you want. All I know is what I read on the manufacturer's website.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
benEzra Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-24-06 11:12 AM
Response to Reply #42
67. 17 feet 2 inches for a target drifting at only 5 mph...
What's the lead on a flying target at 1.25 miles?

17 feet 2 inches for a target drifting at only 5 mph...103 feet 8 inches for a target moving even 30 mph. Forget hitting anything moving at aircraft speeds.

And at that distance, the bullet is also dropping 6 feet 3 inches for every 50 yards of forward travel. So not only do you need to know the target's speed and bearing to within a fraction of a mile per hour, you also have to know the range to the target within +/- 25 yards or so. A 5-mph light breeze will drift the bullet off target by 9 feet 4 inches.

BTW, at that distance, you are dialing in 55 MOA of elevation correction, and the line of sight is 150 feet above the target.


Use the Force, Luke...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
-..__... Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-24-06 12:12 PM
Response to Reply #67
69. "Use the Force, Luke..."
Or just use the pistol grip to spray fire from the hip. That's what it's there for (at least according to the Bradys/VPC/MMM).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
slackmaster Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-24-06 03:25 PM
Response to Reply #67
70. B-b-b-but the MANUFACTURER says the rifle is EFFECTIVE at that range
:dunce:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
benEzra Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-25-06 08:14 AM
Response to Reply #9
73. I sense cognitive dissonance here...
Edited on Thu May-25-06 08:14 AM by benEzra
You're right - It's more like a mile and a quarter:

http://www.inetres.com/gp/military/infantry/rifle/M107....

I sense cognitive dissonance here...read the article you linked:

The primary mission of this rifle is to engage and defeat materiel targets at extended ranges to include parked aircraft; command, control, communications, computers, and intelligence (C4I) sites; radar sites; ammunition; petroleum, oil and lubricants; and various other thin skinned (lightly armored) materiel targets out to 2000 meters.


I don't see anything about shooting down anything. And of course, that's assuming the use of military-only explosive-incendiary-AP (Raufoss) rounds...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gratuitous Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-23-06 02:53 PM
Response to Reply #3
10. Self delete
Edited on Tue May-23-06 02:54 PM by gratuitous
Clicking too many buttons too quickly.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cush Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-23-06 02:54 PM
Response to Reply #3
13. probably a M82 Barrett (50 Cal sniper rifle)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
warrens Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-23-06 03:51 PM
Response to Reply #3
35. Those freakin things are incredible
It's not hyperbole. They're monster guns, incredibly accurate, and there was a move to make them illegal, since they have no conceivable legal use. IIRC, they can shoot accurately well over a mile.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
slackmaster Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-23-06 03:56 PM
Response to Reply #35
37. Hitting a stationary target a mile away with any rifle is very challenging
Edited on Tue May-23-06 03:57 PM by slackmaster
At 1,000 yards a .50 BMG bullet has dropped several feet already.

Hitting a moving target at any long range would be sheer luck.

...they have no conceivable legal use.

How about shooting at a paper target a mile away? :shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gratuitous Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-23-06 04:05 PM
Response to Reply #37
40. To be fair, the manufacturer says maximum effective range
So the maximum effective range is 2,000 yards. The rifle can shoot its ammunition over 7,000 yards, so you'd have to wait for a chopper to close from four miles to one mile to be maximize your chance of hitting it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
slackmaster Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-23-06 04:08 PM
Response to Reply #40
41. At one mile your chances would be slim to none
And Slim just took the last plane to Havana.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Squatch Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-23-06 04:17 PM
Response to Reply #40
46. To "maximize your chance of hitting it"
you would have to wait until the chopper is 0 (zero) feet in front of you. :freak:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gratuitous Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-23-06 04:30 PM
Response to Reply #46
51. Kind of jumped off of "hyperbole" haven't we?
Or did you want to go argue with the manufacturer that its .50 caliber rifle can hit a target a mile away?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Squatch Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-23-06 04:33 PM
Response to Reply #51
52. No, I am just holding you to accurate usage of terminology
If you are going to talk about this stuff, you probably should know proper usage of some basic terminology.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kagemusha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-23-06 06:09 PM
Response to Reply #52
55. Well see, hitting a target a mile away is naturally very hard...
but these .50 cal rifles make the task much, much easier.

In practice, there's only two ways a helicopter could get hit aside from the worst luck ever:

a) Moving, but straight towards the shooter
b) Hovering, more or less stationary

Now, if a helicopter tries to do something like, oh, landing, it's possible to hit one. Now it's not... easy... but with lighter bullets, the rotors are moving enough air that bullets will tend to change course a lot. A .50 cal presents a better chance of hitting a helicopter because of mass. Also, since it's a larger, heavier bullet, it will have a larger chance of doing damage.

However, let's be plain, these rifles are intended for sniping human beings at especially long ranges. On the other hand, were a helicopter to be hit by a .50 cal rifle, the results may not be pretty.

I hope that comes off as fair and reasonable here. Incidentally, I don't think I've heard of a .50 cal ever being used in crimes. I mean, I see stuff like that on TV but, in real life, murderers tend to avoid rare weapons that can be more easily traced back to specific individuals.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Squatch Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-23-06 06:30 PM
Response to Reply #55
56. People think shooting aircraft only requires a bit of practice.
At the NTC in California, all six of my howitzers were to practice shooting down an aircraft with the M-2 .50 machine gun. The drone is almost the size of a Cessna 150, and flies at about 1000 to 2000 feet away, back and forth at about 80-100 kts.

All six machine guns, each with hundreds of rounds of ammunition, throwing up a wall of lead could not bring down that drone. I was dumbfounded.

I'm sorry, but because of my personal experience, I believe that for a rifleman with one bullet (hell, a whole magazine) CANNOT bring down an aircraft in flight over a mile away. There's just no way that (barring the chance of a extremely lucky shot) the rifleman will be able to determine:

1) The range to the target (No range cues for an aircraft flying in airspace)
2) The speed of the target (The farther away, the slower the aircraft appears to be moving)

Even with tracer bullets, the M-2 gunners were consistently shooting under and behind the target drone.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kagemusha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-23-06 06:43 PM
Response to Reply #56
57. Your experiences reflect my understanding well.
But helicopters have this tendency to stop and hover in one place. It's not something that other types of aircraft are capable of. Motionless, even dumb unguided RPG's have been known to bring helicopters down (i.e. Black Hawk Down).

Now if we changed the subject to, say, unarmored police cruisers, the issue gets muddled a bit.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Squatch Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-23-06 06:50 PM
Response to Reply #57
58. Don't you think it reasonable to assume that police pilots
realize that their helicopters might be targets and it's in their best interests NOT to hover, but to keep moving? These helicopters are equipped with extremely advanced sensors that are designed to track moving targets EVEN WHEN the sensor platform (the helicopter) is moving.

A police helicopter, in a tactical situation, does not just "hover" like in the movies, but takes up an orbit to reduce the risk of drawing (aimed) fire.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kagemusha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-23-06 07:11 PM
Response to Reply #58
59. I don't think it's reasonable for pilots to assume everyone has a .50 cal
Though granted, only an utter and complete moron would hover in a tactical situation.

It's possible to say a .50 cal could bring down a helicopter without believing that this is likely. And that is my position.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Squatch Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-23-06 07:14 PM
Response to Reply #59
60. So could a well thrown rock.
LOL.

I think you and I are arguing the same point from slightly different angles.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kagemusha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-23-06 07:18 PM
Response to Reply #60
61. The .50 cal is slightly more likely to work though.
Slightly. :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
benEzra Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-24-06 12:07 PM
Response to Reply #59
68. True...
I think it's much easier to envision a helicopter being taken down by a .308 at relatively short range (100-200 yards) than a .50 at some unbelievable distance, though. If you look at the ballistics, it would literally be a miracle shot.

It is possible, though...just as it is possible that a rock lying on the ground will, through quantum effects, spontaneously disappear from ground level and reappear in the helicopter's gearbox. Not bloody likely, but possible...and police helicopters have been brought down by quantum tunneling rocks just as often as they have been brought down with .50 caliber target rifles... :D
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
slackmaster Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-24-06 08:43 AM
Response to Reply #58
65. Personal observation of San Diego PD helicopters
The SDPD has been using helos for decades. I've seen them operating over and near my neighborhood hundreds of times over the 17+ years I have lived in my present neighborhood.

I can't recall ever seeing one hover stationary, even for a moment. They are ALWAYS either transiting from one area to another, or circling.

From a rifleman's perspective I have seen them close enough to hit without much difficulty, but if I were inclined to do so I'd surely pick a weapon that can be readily swung into position and aimed, like an M1 Garand, rather than my 30-pound .50 BMG target rifle.

But that's just me. Maybe someone much stronger than I am might be able to shoulder a .50 and hit a helicopter at close range.

As for hitting one a mile away, forget about it. That's what heat-seeking missiles were invented for.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Paladin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-23-06 07:44 PM
Response to Reply #55
62. Everybody Enjoying This Wholesome Discussion?

n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kagemusha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-23-06 08:55 PM
Response to Reply #62
63. There's a lot of ignorance out there about the issue.
People should have a few facts in hand when debating if the .50 cal rifle should be banned or not. It is a valid issue, and is relevant to a white supremacist's group's possession of one.

Mind you, the discussion seems over now.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MrBenchley Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-24-06 07:34 PM
Response to Reply #63
72. Which is why jeniuses like David Duke and Ted Nugent oppose a ban on them
(snicker)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MrBenchley Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-23-06 08:57 PM
Response to Reply #62
64. Always interesting to see how malignant the trigger happy are....
It sure is one "liberal" issue, all righty.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
diamondsndust Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-23-06 02:47 PM
Response to Original message
4. ok, who's been looking in my closet???
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Historic NY Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-23-06 02:49 PM
Response to Original message
6. What no partridge in a pear tree.........
Boot Boys......The 50 cal. gun is what the military uses when they want to get to real serious sniping. Its not your typical rifle, the NRA defends owning them for what purpose I do not know. Its not pretty if a human is hit by one.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Minnesota_Lib Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-23-06 02:51 PM
Response to Original message
7. I guess the Free Republic website's membership just thinned out somewhat..
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
uppityperson Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-23-06 02:52 PM
Response to Original message
8. Timothy McVeigh was a white boy too.
I have not been hassled by any male except white. I have only been robbed by a white boy. I have only been beat up by a white boy. I am white too, by the way. If these guys had near/middle eastern names, it would have been all over the media. Scary white boys.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
slackmaster Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-23-06 02:53 PM
Response to Original message
12. It's just a drug dealer gang bust
...The group reportedly called itself AZ 88 Boot Boys...

They're going to be known as the "AZ 88 Butt Boys" in prison.

:hide:

Nothing to see here, please move on.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OldLeftieLawyer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-23-06 02:54 PM
Response to Original message
14. How about this kid who killed two of our local police officers?
How come this family's stash isn't causing more of a national outrage, especially when they knew their son was mentally ill, and yet they had a cache for firearms in the house, readily available to the kid - who used them to kill two Fairfax County, Virginia police officers, gunning them down like targets as they walked out of their police station at a shift change?

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2006/05/22/AR2006052201633_pf.html

What? Is it OK for suburban white middle-class families to keep AK-47s where their sick son can get his hands on them and use them to murder?

I guess it is.

Thanks for letting the Brady Bill expire, Fuckface.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Historic NY Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-23-06 03:04 PM
Response to Reply #14
15. I was at the funeral in Fairfax........
I was sorry to hear the other officer died the week I came back home.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OldLeftieLawyer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-23-06 03:10 PM
Response to Reply #15
20. He hung in there for 8 or 9 days
Jesus, I cried when I heard he died. I really thought he'd make it. Massive organ failure, all at once.

What a warrior.

I had just had a terrible thing happen and it was in the Fairfax jurisdiction - a couple of months ago - and those police officers were so wonderful - I mean, above and beyond, to the poiint of three of the hugging me as we left the scene, and then calling me a few days later to make sure I was all right - that I had just written a letter to the Chief about them the day the shootings took place.

All you can do is cry. Two absolutely great people gone because of a sick boy, and no matter what Bob Horan says, I think the parents really should be prosecuted for having those guns available in that house, knowing the kid's condition.

Who the hell needs to own an AK-47, I ask you?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
-..__... Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-23-06 03:11 PM
Response to Reply #14
23. Where in that article is there any mention of "AK-47s"?
And the Brady Bill expired? That's news to me.

I'll have to inform my local gun shop of that the next time they submit a NICs check on my purcahse.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OldLeftieLawyer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-23-06 03:13 PM
Response to Reply #23
24. If it's news to you, this might help you to stay up-to-date:
http://www.awbansunset.com/

The article in my paper mentioned an AK-47. I can't be certain that the online version did, but, yeah, there was an AK-47 in the house when the kid went home to get the guns. In fact, that's one of the guns he used to kill the police officers, as I recall. Just sprayed the area outside the station.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
slackmaster Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-23-06 03:21 PM
Response to Reply #24
29. AW ban was not the Brady Law
The Brady Law requires background checks on all retail sales of firearms by licensed gun dealers. It's still the law.

And the AW ban did not stop the sale of semiautomatic variants of the AK-47, only ones with certain features. The publicity probably increased the number of semiautomatic AKs in circulation.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OldLeftieLawyer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-23-06 04:12 PM
Response to Reply #29
43. Oh,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,
I stand corrected. It's been a long day, and when I see Sarah Brady say, as she did elsewhere, "Thanks for letting the law expire" to Fuckface, I just assumed it was the Brady Bill.

I abhor guns, and think people who need to own them have something wrong with them, but, that's just me. Anyone who feels the need to own an AK-47 has serious problems. That's what I think, and that's what I've always thought - losing two loved ones to people with guns certainly didn't do anything to change my thinking.

Thanks for clearing that up.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
slackmaster Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-23-06 04:48 PM
Response to Reply #43
54. Brady is a good law IMO; AW ban was worse than useless
...losing two loved ones to people with guns certainly didn't do anything to change my thinking.

I'm sorry to hear about your losses Leftie.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
-..__... Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-23-06 03:25 PM
Response to Reply #24
31. Ahhh, do you realize the AWB and the Brady Bill...
are two entirely different things?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OldLeftieLawyer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-23-06 04:14 PM
Response to Reply #31
44. No, I didn't, and
I thanked the poster below who cleared that up for me.

Any way you cut it, guns are for idiots, as far as I'm concerned, but my casual - and erroneous - reading of the news that lead me to that link - a quote from Sarah Brady - left me with the wrong conclusion.

I stand corrected, and my apologies.

All guns should be illegal. That's what I think. They're just not necessary.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
-..__... Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-23-06 04:21 PM
Response to Reply #44
48. There's an awful lot of idiots in this country then.
Estimates from both sides put it at anywhere from 60-80 million gun owners in this country.
If even half of them vote, that's an awful lot of voters to alienate with your suggestion that
"all guns should be illegal".
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OldLeftieLawyer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-23-06 04:25 PM
Response to Reply #48
49. That wasn't my suggestion,
and I wasn't soliciting voters.

It was my opinion.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sendero Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-23-06 04:44 PM
Response to Reply #44
53. If making guns illegal..
... would make possession of them rare, you might have a point.

Pot is illegal, yet millions use it every day.

There are some "problems" that you cannot fix with a law.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ShaneGR Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-23-06 03:05 PM
Response to Original message
16. So, ummm, how are white people to be "supremacy" if they're on Meth?
Seriously, is an army of a few thousand wrecked underweight dope fiends going to take over the country soon?

Sometimes I just have to shake my head and sigh.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bleedingheart Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-23-06 03:30 PM
Response to Reply #16
32. I have a feeling they sold meth to buy their weapons....
so they dope up some people's kids so that later they can gun down other people's kids...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Minnesota_Lib Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-23-06 03:06 PM
Response to Original message
17. I wonder if this is the same Todd Streich that was convicted of rape in VT
Edited on Tue May-23-06 03:08 PM by Minnesota_Lib
"August 4, 1991 - A judge's decision not to tell members of a jury pool that CBS News was videotaping the trial they were going to hear has angered some lawyers and judges, the news media and some of the prospective jurors themselves. Eleven of the prospective jurors have now filed a formal complaint about the judge. A camera crew from CBS came to Burlington to videotape the trial of Todd Streich, a 25-year-old man accused of raping a woman at gunpoint two years ago. The jury found Mr. Streich guilty on July 18. The videotape is to be broadcast Aug. 9 on CBS's new program "Verdict," according to Al Briganti, the co-producer."

Not sure this is the same jerk, but this guy was 25 years old in 1991 which would put him at 40 this year--the same age as this white supremist.


http://topics.nytimes.com/top/news/science/topics/dna_deoxyribonucleic_acid/index.html?query=JURY%20SYSTEM&field=des&match=exact

http://dol.state.vt.us/gopher_root1/000000/supct/163/state_v_streich.91-335
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
burythehatchet Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-23-06 03:07 PM
Response to Original message
18. ...and who amongst us has not had
a youthful indiscretion
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bucky Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-23-06 03:51 PM
Response to Reply #18
36. It vuss all a yuutful indisgretchen...
I svear to Gott! Aren't ve all yust humanz?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lpbk2713 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-23-06 03:10 PM
Response to Original message
21. .... and a partri-i-idge in a pear tree....... n/t




(I just had to)



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lexingtonian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-23-06 03:34 PM
Response to Reply #21
33. LOL! n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fridays Child Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-23-06 03:10 PM
Response to Original message
22. Broadcasting news such as this doesn't well serve their corporate masters.
Only terrorism of the Middle Eastern variety is "newsworthy."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dora Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-23-06 03:17 PM
Response to Original message
25. Westsiders, jeez. Glendale will never change.
The west side of Phoenix has always been a haven for white supremacists.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Coexist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-23-06 03:20 PM
Response to Original message
27. delete -wrong place to respond.
Edited on Tue May-23-06 03:21 PM by FLDem5
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NoPasaran Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-23-06 03:23 PM
Response to Original message
30. Shoot, a fellow could have a pretty good weekend in Vegas...
Shoot, a fellow could have a pretty good weekend in Vegas with all that stuff
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Stranger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-23-06 03:36 PM
Response to Original message
34. The War on Terror is bigoted, racist, xenophobic and targets non-Whites
and non-"Christians" only.

There. Someone had to say it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tierra_y_Libertad Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-23-06 04:16 PM
Response to Original message
45. Toys for little boys trying to convince themselves they're men.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bobbieinok Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-23-06 04:19 PM
Response to Original message
47. wasn't there a big gun find in TX a bit ago with NO MEDIA coverage????
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MisterP Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-23-06 04:26 PM
Response to Reply #47
50. William Krar, his girlfriend, and others
Tyler, Tex., 500,000 rounds of ammo, and a BIG sodium cyanide bomb
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jeffersons Ghost Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-24-06 04:16 PM
Response to Original message
71. kick
:kick:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 19th 2024, 04:07 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC