LTTE to NYTimes regarding bs article on Clintons' marriage

[TomInTib]

To the Editor:

Re "For Clintons, Delicate Dance of Married and Public Lives" (front page, May 23):

I'm not quite sure what to make of your report about Bill and Hillary Clinton's marriage as provided by anonymous experts.

What I do know is that I'll be looking forward to the same thorough reporting into the marriages of other presidential hopefuls, like John McCain and Rudolph W. Giuliani, including "interviews with some 50 people and a review of their respective activities."

I assume that those critical investigations will be prominently placed in The Times as well; I'd really hate to miss them.

Vivienne Leheny
New York, May 23, 2006

http://www.nytimes.com/2006/05/24/opinion/l24clinton.html?n=Top%2fOpinion%2fEditorials%20and%20Op%2dEd%2fLetters&pagewanted=print

[Polly Hennessey]

1. Bill and Hill

Good for you. Great letter.

[madaboutharry]

2. Excellent Vivienne!!

Why do reporters for the NY Times have so much time on their hands?

[LiviaOlivia]

3. Well said Vivienne. And thx Tom

Even Letterman got booed and a very loud groan last night during his intro to his "Top Ten": Clinton's marriage.

Personally I enjoyed the General's post on the NYT blog. Unfortunately the tasteless bastards at the NYT's removed his post.

Although I enjoyed the Time's piece on the Klintons, I was very disappointed that you were unable to nail down how often they do the wild thing. I was also hoping that you'd provide a detailed description of the former president's thingy. Does it really curve to the left?

Still, even without these things, it was the kind of important journalism we've come to expect from the Times. You should be proud.

Hopefully, you'll continue to do stories like this. I'd be very interested in learning how often John Bolton gets him some without having to pay for it.

http://patriotboy.blogspot.com/2006_05_21_patriotboy_archive.html#114839718870936632