DancingBear
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu May-25-06 11:16 AM
Original message |
A couple of questions on Lay and Skilling |
|
Edited on Thu May-25-06 11:27 AM by DancingBear
Are there still deals to be made with them as to who helped them, i.e. the CA energy price-fixing, for one.
Are there political heads to give up in exchange for lighter sentences?
In other words, how much pull do the prosecutors still have, and are they looking "one level up?"
|
liberalnurse
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu May-25-06 11:21 AM
Response to Original message |
1. Another question too.... |
|
Will they be cuffed and shackled today? Can the get out on appeal?
|
sinkingfeeling
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu May-25-06 11:22 AM
Response to Original message |
2. They will probably be out for years...rounds of appeals and then |
Old and In the Way
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu May-25-06 11:26 AM
Response to Reply #2 |
3. Big political risk, though. |
|
This is a pretty high profile case. Millions of people were directly hurt by the actions of this company. If Bush were to pardon Lay, the blowback against the Republican Party would be pretty severe, IMHO.
|
Cerridwen
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu May-25-06 11:29 AM
Response to Reply #3 |
|
but (you knew there was a "but" there, right? :D) I haven't noticed that this particular occupant of the "People's House" is very interested in what happens to "his" party. he and his followers seem more concerned with concentrating their wealth and power regardless of whose backs they must break to do so.
Now, having stated my "but", I hope I'm wrong.
|
Old and In the Way
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu May-25-06 11:43 AM
Response to Reply #4 |
5. Let me add my own "but", too. |
|
But we don't know what Lay/Skillings could have on GWB. Lay was his #1 benefactor. I suspect that Lay could well have an evidentiary insurance policy that could be, literally, a "get out of jail free" card. If he is pardoned, it won't be because it is good for the Republican Party. It will be because, to do otherwise, would be worse for George Bush.
|
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Thu Apr 25th 2024, 10:50 AM
Response to Original message |