Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Remember How Happy We Were Nov. 1, 2005?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
 
chiburb Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-13-06 10:38 AM
Original message
Remember How Happy We Were Nov. 1, 2005?
That was the day Reid and Durbin took the Senate into a closed session and held the Repukes hostage for 3 hours. They were trying to force Pat Roberts to hold "Phase II" of the pre-invasion intelligence hearings; the phase that would investigate the manipulation and fabrication of such intelligence by the mis-administration. The shut-down resulted in an agreement to produce a written report detailing the specifics of how Phase II would be handled and scheduled. 3 Senators from each party were to produce this report within 14 days.

74 days later...

I called Sen. Durbin's office for an update. Obviously, they've been very busy with the Scalito hearings but still managed to email me the following Congressional Quarterly piece. I present it in it's entirety, and would urge your comments be directed to Harry Reid's office if this continued stonewalling offends you as much as it does me.


Dec. 13, 2005 – 7:50 p.m.
Democratic Senate Leaders Complain of Lack of Progress by Intelligence Panel
By Mary Speck, CQ Staff
Senate Democratic leader Harry Reid of Nevada asked Majority Leader Bill Frist of Tennessee Tuesday to reconvene a six-member Intelligence Committee task force appointed last month to assess progress in a controversial probe into prewar intelligence and to draw up a timetable for its completion.

In a letter addressed to Frist and Republican whip Mitch McConnell of Kentucky, Reid and Democratic whip Richard J. Durbin of Illinois said the bipartisan task force had not completed the assignment it was given during a secret session of the Senate called by Democrats Nov. 1.

Because the task force was unable to reach agreement, Reid and Durbin wrote, “critical questions remain about the committee’s progress” and about “what remaining steps need to be taken to ensure a prompt, thorough and complete review.” The two senators asked that the special panel be asked to brief leaders this week, before the Senate adjourns until mid-January.

Intelligence Committee Chairman Pat Roberts, R-Kan., attacked the letter as a “partisan allegation.” Roberts said in a statement that the Democrats were fully informed about the investigation’s progress.

“If the Democrat Leader has ‘critical questions’ he should pick up the phone and call me, or better yet, attend the business meeting scheduled for this Thursday when we will discuss all facets of our progress on ‘Phase II,’ ” Roberts said in a statement.

The task force met once Nov. 8 to discuss the investigation, which is known as Phase II because it continues a review of pre-invasion intelligence on Iraq that began in 2003. The first part of the probe, which focused on why the CIA failed to accurately assess Iraqi weapons programs, was completed last year.

Senate Democrats decided to call attention to what they claim is a stalled probe by calling the closed session. Republicans called the maneuver a “political stunt” but agreed to appoint the task force, which was to report back to the leaders by Nov. 14.

However, the members were unable to issue a joint statement by the deadline. Instead the three Republicans and the three Democrats wrote separate letters to their leaders.

In their Nov. 14 letter, the three Democrats on the task force — Intelligence Vice Chairman John D. Rockefeller IV of West Virginia, Carl Levin of Michigan and Dianne Feinstein of California — said they were unable to provide an estimated completion date “given the substantial amount of work that remains to be done.” But they said that a “general timeline” had been discussed.

They also outlined areas of disagreement, such as how to investigate intelligence activities prior to the invasion by Pentagon officials working under then Undersecretary of Defense Douglas J. Feith.

Roberts has put that part of the probe on hold until the Department of Defense Inspector General determines whether the officials’ activities were unlawful. Democrats say the two probes should occur concurrently and want to be able to use their subpoena power to compel witnesses to testify.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
JDPriestly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-13-06 10:42 AM
Response to Original message
1. Thanks for the post.
Let's put some pressure on the senators to follow through on this investigation. It is extremely important, especially as we hear talk of war against Iran and Syria.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-13-06 10:45 AM
Response to Original message
2. 74 days later...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProfessorPlum Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-13-06 10:50 AM
Response to Original message
3. Good times, good times
I also remember how happy I was early on election day in 2004.

Little islands of hope in a sea of sewage.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
chiburb Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-13-06 11:21 AM
Response to Original message
4. One kick for late risers...n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed Apr 24th 2024, 12:37 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC