Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

A Quick History Review on Two SCOTUS Seats That Should Have Been Defeated.

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
 
The Whiskey Priest Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-13-06 10:54 AM
Original message
A Quick History Review on Two SCOTUS Seats That Should Have Been Defeated.
Edited on Fri Jan-13-06 10:56 AM by The Whiskey Priest
Scalia was confirmed unanimously (98-0) by the Senate September 17, 1986 Democrats held a 55-45 majority.

Thomas was confirmed by the Senate with a 52-48 vote on October 13, 1991. Democrats held a 57-43 majority.


This nomination might not be as important if we had blocked those two seats when we had the numbers.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
unblock Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-13-06 10:58 AM
Response to Original message
1. it's truly insane. at some point, democrats in congres decided
that the president should be allowed to nominate anyone, no matter how politically or judicially insane, just so long as they paid their nanny taxes, never smoked weed, and can't be convicted of sexual harassment.

this is why the right wing is still up in arms about bork, because he is the very rare exception to this rule.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
eyesroll Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-13-06 11:03 AM
Response to Reply #1
4. Well, the president *should* be allowed to NOMINATE anyone.
It's his prerogative.

But, the Senate shouldn't automatically CONFIRM anyone.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WI_DEM Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-13-06 11:01 AM
Response to Original message
2. Thomas should have been defeated
I don't know the explanation about Scalia--I assume that even Ted Kennedy voted for him--but Thomas had alot against him--The republicans said it was "she said, he said", but obviously there was merit to what Anita Hill testified.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
unblock Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-13-06 11:42 AM
Response to Reply #2
7. it became a trial where "not guilty" meant a lifetime scotus appointment
what a ridiculous standard for confirmation.
nevermind the fact that he was unqualified quite apart from the alleged sexual harassment.

the fact that he STILL cribs off scalia proves how worthless he is as a justice. he's nothing more than a banaan republican aparatchik.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
eyesroll Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-13-06 11:02 AM
Response to Original message
3. Did we know Scalia would be as he is, when he got confirmed?
(I was 11.)

I do remember the Thomas confirmation enough to know it should have gone to someone else.

But a lot of it is a crap shoot, and we don't know how good/bad someone will be until they're there. (See: Souter. He was protested by NOW when he was nominated. These days, he's reliably on our side.)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
greatauntoftriplets Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-13-06 11:10 AM
Response to Original message
5. The record isn't good.
:evilfrown:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LibertyLover Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-13-06 11:26 AM
Response to Original message
6. We are so screwed for so many years to come
when Alito gets confirmed. It's going to happen because the Republicans have the votes and in the end enough of the Democrats will vote yes because they don't want to be seen as obstructionist or not nice or some garbage like that. I have to say that the one thing that bothers me with respect to the Constitution is that it provides for life-time appointments for Supreme Court and Federal Appeals Court judges with very little remedy available to remove them. I don't know what the answer is, nor do I expect any change in my lifetime. Frankly, both the Roberts and the Alito hearings, combined with the current political and economic situations in the US have me depressed and concerned for our country.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Whiskey Priest Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-13-06 12:37 PM
Response to Reply #6
8. If the party, Democrats, had acted wisely and held up or defeat
Scalia and Thomas...we would not be so worried about the court at this moment.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 06:28 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC