Viva_La_Revolution
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Jan-13-06 12:01 PM
Original message |
Official Alito Hearing Thread – Day 5 – Thread 3 |
helderheid
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Jan-13-06 12:03 PM
Response to Original message |
Viva_La_Revolution
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Jan-13-06 12:03 PM
Response to Original message |
Occulus
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Jan-13-06 12:03 PM
Response to Original message |
3. kicking to get people here instead of thread 2 n/t |
Sydnie
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Jan-13-06 12:03 PM
Response to Original message |
EST
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Jan-13-06 12:04 PM
Response to Original message |
5. This day is the most important of all the hearings. |
|
I feel honored to share the same world with some of them.
|
Sydnie
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Jan-13-06 12:04 PM
Response to Reply #5 |
9. It is humbling, isn't it? n/t |
EST
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Jan-13-06 12:52 PM
Response to Reply #9 |
116. Yeah-makes a human feel like here is a new chance |
|
to finally make up for those times I missed or chances I didn't take. The empire is doomed-long live the empire!
In the presence of greatness. :-)
|
in_cog_ni_to
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Jan-13-06 12:04 PM
Response to Original message |
6. Debbie Wasserman Schultz! Yay! |
|
She's at the table! I LOVE that woman! I love listening to her and her "Gang of 30-something" on the House floor! She ROCKS!
|
FreedomAngel82
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Jan-13-06 12:41 PM
Response to Reply #6 |
|
Edited on Fri Jan-13-06 12:41 PM by FreedomAngel82
I love listening to her and Tim Ryan on the floor in the House and anyone they bring a long. There are so many good democrats like her who I sometimes wish were in the Senate because they have more balls than some democratic senators.
|
CornField
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Jan-13-06 12:04 PM
Response to Original message |
7. I'm really ticked off at Sessions |
|
How dare he discuss the discriminatory laws which were removed in his state and equate those with stare decisis in overturning privacy laws set by the Supreme Court!
|
in_cog_ni_to
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Jan-13-06 12:07 PM
Response to Reply #7 |
14. Sessions did that???!!! |
|
I'm not surprised. I'm actaully surprised he isn't a member of the KKK. He strikes me as the type that would be a member.
|
atreides1
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Jan-13-06 12:08 PM
Response to Reply #14 |
|
Just because he doesn't wear a white cloak and hood, doesn't mean he isn't a member.
|
in_cog_ni_to
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Jan-13-06 12:13 PM
Response to Reply #17 |
33. Good point. You're right. |
CornField
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Jan-13-06 12:09 PM
Response to Reply #14 |
18. He sucked up to the Civil Rights attorney on the panel |
|
Got the fellow to start talking about how he set off to "dismantle anything to do with segregation" -- then turned it at the end to talk about the laws which were overturned and how, sometimes, stare decisis isn't such a good thing.
|
in_cog_ni_to
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Jan-13-06 12:12 PM
Response to Reply #18 |
29. ~~~~picking jaw up off the floor!~~~~~ |
|
UNFREAKINBELIEVABLE! I detest that little whiny ass racist bastard.
|
EFerrari
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Jan-13-06 12:17 PM
Response to Reply #18 |
43. It wasn't sucking up. He was condescending to that gentleman |
|
in racist double speak. He was hoping to loosen him up and trip him up, smiling all the while. The witness didn't oblige.
|
CornField
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Jan-13-06 12:23 PM
Response to Reply #43 |
61. I equate "sucking up" with being condescending |
|
Put it this way, I've never had anyone suck up to me with good intentions.
|
EFerrari
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Jan-13-06 12:37 PM
Response to Reply #61 |
Surya Gayatri
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Jan-13-06 12:08 PM
Response to Reply #7 |
16. Insidious & underhanded |
|
comparison. Hardly comparable with 200 years of Supreme Court precedent. But what else can you expect from Slither Sessions? SG
|
Viva_La_Revolution
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Jan-13-06 12:13 PM
Response to Reply #16 |
|
Perfect! Slimey didn't quite fit, Snake didn't either...
Slither Sessions!
:rofl:
|
Surya Gayatri
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Jan-13-06 12:21 PM
Response to Reply #34 |
53. In connection with him, |
|
the word "ooze" also comes to mind--but that just doesn't have the same alliterative charm! :evilgrin: SG
|
yourout
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Jan-13-06 12:04 PM
Response to Original message |
8. Alito parrot coming up? |
|
This will be informative......not.
|
doublethink
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Jan-13-06 12:07 PM
Response to Reply #8 |
13. Yea this first one Kate Pringle ........ |
|
Edited on Fri Jan-13-06 12:08 PM by doublethink
worked a whole year ....... 1 year under this guy. Great testimonial to his life long ambitions, values, etc... etc... Peace. :crazy:
|
CornField
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Jan-13-06 12:05 PM
Response to Original message |
10. Kate Pringle -- former clerk for Alito -- says she's a Dem |
yourout
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Jan-13-06 12:06 PM
Response to Reply #10 |
11. Me thinks we need to do a little digging. |
The Witch
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Jan-13-06 12:10 PM
Response to Reply #11 |
Sydnie
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Jan-13-06 12:11 PM
Response to Reply #23 |
26. I was just reading that too. n/t |
yourout
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Jan-13-06 12:09 PM
Response to Reply #10 |
20. How can a woman Dem look at this guys record and support him? |
Czolgosz
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Jan-13-06 12:36 PM
Response to Reply #20 |
92. Self interest. Having served under Alito, she can market herself as "the |
|
democrat lawyer who has a personal-professional connection with Alito," a valuable legal niche if Alito is elevated to the Supreme Court. If Alito is elevated, and someone has an important case before the court, who better than his former clerk to advise how best to calculate the legal arguments to sway him?
Of course Alito's former clerk favors Alito; her connection with him will make her rich, but only if Alito is elevated.
|
PatsFan2004
(245 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Jan-13-06 12:12 PM
Response to Reply #10 |
31. I think that Rove would not miss on making sure that a |
|
registered DEM Alito clerk would testify. Why get a Repuke clerk to pretend to be a DEM when you can probably find a deluded DEM clerk?
|
Mind_your_head
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Jan-13-06 12:06 PM
Response to Original message |
12. She worked for him for ONE YEAR 1993-1994 |
|
That was, ehm, 11-12 YEARS AGO!
|
doublethink
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Jan-13-06 12:10 PM
Response to Reply #12 |
21. Damn I was beginging to think her speech ....... |
|
right now was about to take as long as she worked for the guy. :crazy:
|
Mind_your_head
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Jan-13-06 12:12 PM
Response to Reply #21 |
doublethink
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Jan-13-06 12:10 PM
Response to Reply #12 |
|
Edited on Fri Jan-13-06 12:11 PM by doublethink
Dupe post.
|
in_cog_ni_to
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Jan-13-06 12:08 PM
Response to Original message |
15. How does Debbie Wasserman Schultz fit in this??? |
sproutster
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Jan-13-06 12:09 PM
Response to Original message |
19. Alito Clerk Kate Pringle |
|
He is mentor - explain briefly clerk job - give research, assist in analysis- unusually close relationship.
Then as now active democrate - heard rumor conservative - thought contentious. Found different. His approach not personal, but hard work and devotions. Share several things 1. work cases bottom up. not top down come to each case open mind work carefully from analasys no personal agenda - methodical - demanding read and reread and relevant decisions. worked hard on each case large and small - divorsed from personal and biased 2. Respect different views. selects law firms diff back and views. in exper never dismissive of any pov. Never caustic or rude. Respectful of fellow judges - sought consensous, respectful when dissenting. Reflected by advocation of other judges here. 3. cog of limited role as estab by written law, never personal agenda. Showed honesty and justice. JA thoughtful and generous boss. no personal arrogance. My pleasure to work for him. both men and women Repug and Dem all came to support him he will be outstanding.
|
yourout
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Jan-13-06 12:11 PM
Response to Reply #19 |
Sydnie
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Jan-13-06 12:10 PM
Response to Original message |
24. You know, all these former clerks have to be looked at in a |
|
different light. They have something to gain if he is confirmed. It will boost their own resume to be able to say that they clerked for a judge that went on to be on the Supreme Court. We can't lose sight of their motivation in this area.
|
EFerrari
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Jan-13-06 12:12 PM
Response to Reply #24 |
Binka
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Jan-13-06 12:14 PM
Response to Reply #24 |
36. They Would Like To Work With Him Again |
|
They are angling for position and power. Sycophants!
|
Viva_La_Revolution
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Jan-13-06 12:15 PM
Response to Reply #36 |
|
How's your boy doing?
Stateside yet?
|
sasha031
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Jan-13-06 12:18 PM
Response to Reply #24 |
49. Debbie Wasserman Schultz |
Viva_La_Revolution
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Jan-13-06 12:11 PM
Response to Original message |
|
Edited on Fri Jan-13-06 12:12 PM by Viva_La_Revolution
Hispanic caucus is greatly concerned
|
CornField
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Jan-13-06 12:13 PM
Response to Reply #25 |
|
Dicussing Alito's record on minorities.
|
EFerrari
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Jan-13-06 12:14 PM
Response to Reply #25 |
35. We know the nominee will be the President's choice, but |
|
the Supreme Court should not be a mere extension of the Executive Branch.
What you said, hermanito.
|
DemonFighterLives
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Jan-13-06 12:16 PM
Response to Reply #35 |
41. Recommend to the Hispanic caucus to oppose this nom. |
in_cog_ni_to
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Jan-13-06 12:15 PM
Response to Original message |
37. He was on C-SPAN yesterday (?) I think. |
|
He wasn't too fond of ScAlito's rulings.;)
|
sproutster
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Jan-13-06 12:15 PM
Response to Original message |
|
Hispanic - dismayed none picked. Nation should show diversity. Hispanic extensive exam of nominee - his or her efforts for constitutional authority - supporting political access for all of america. (he talks waaay fast) Highlight concern - discrimination from basis of ethnicity. School district voting - constitutional rights of noncitizens - cited no law for immigrents. equal opp emp. - deviates from norms to discriminate on race or gender. we know nom prez wishes. does not mean should be extention of exec branch. That's senate needs to approve. Limited ques to nom - philosophy under advice and consent. employer of employee, able over disable, etc... Third countered tendency regardless of status. If law does not protect you, it will not protect me. (I really like this guys way of pointing these items out - clear) should not be cons vs. lib - any should share judicial cong - that law does not protect you it protects no one.
|
in_cog_ni_to
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Jan-13-06 12:16 PM
Response to Original message |
40. THIS WOMAN IS AWESOME!!!! |
|
Edited on Fri Jan-13-06 12:16 PM by in_cog_ni_to
I bet she doesn't support ScAlito! ;)
|
Viva_La_Revolution
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Jan-13-06 12:16 PM
Response to Original message |
42. Debbie Wasserman Schultz |
in_cog_ni_to
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Jan-13-06 12:17 PM
Original message |
WOOHOO...REJECT THE NOMINATION. |
|
I knew I could count on her!
|
lonestarnot
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Jan-13-06 12:43 PM
Response to Original message |
DemonFighterLives
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Jan-13-06 12:18 PM
Response to Reply #42 |
47. She calls to reject his arse |
|
Blatant disregard of personal rights. :applause:
|
CornField
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Jan-13-06 12:19 PM
Response to Reply #42 |
50. You are considering a nominee... who is comfortable putting a woman's |
|
rights into the hands of her husband the minute a marriage license is signed.
|
dogday
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Jan-13-06 12:17 PM
Response to Original message |
44. Alito shits on civil rights |
CornField
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Jan-13-06 12:17 PM
Response to Original message |
45. Where is the committee? |
|
Did the Republicans decide their tender ears couldn't suffer through the truth?
|
in_cog_ni_to
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Jan-13-06 12:19 PM
Response to Reply #45 |
51. They're a bunch of assholes. They can't HANDLE THE TRUTH!!! |
dogday
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Jan-13-06 12:18 PM
Response to Original message |
46. Spector looks uncomfortable |
Viva_La_Revolution
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Jan-13-06 12:18 PM
Response to Original message |
48. whoo hoo! a dig at Jebbie! |
DemonFighterLives
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Jan-13-06 12:21 PM
Response to Reply #48 |
55. People should not be in private family stuff Schiavo case |
|
Cap questions. credentials alone do not make a good justice. he will replace one of only 2 women on Scotus. She was told little girls could grow up and be anything they wanted.
|
in_cog_ni_to
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Jan-13-06 12:20 PM
Response to Original message |
The Witch
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Jan-13-06 12:21 PM
Response to Original message |
54. Debbie: Look at Reality, you ideological morons. |
Sydnie
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Jan-13-06 12:22 PM
Response to Reply #54 |
|
Arms crossed and talking with his aids instead of listening. He is a rude asshole!
|
EFerrari
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Jan-13-06 12:22 PM
Response to Reply #56 |
DemonFighterLives
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Jan-13-06 12:24 PM
Response to Reply #56 |
62. still trying to explain the magic bullet I presume |
|
Deb Was-shulz rocked their world. :yourock:
|
EFerrari
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Jan-13-06 12:23 PM
Response to Reply #54 |
janx
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Jan-13-06 12:33 PM
Original message |
I'm sorry to have missed her. |
|
She's so passionate and so smart!
|
FreedomAngel82
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Jan-13-06 12:54 PM
Response to Original message |
118. Will there be any video(s)?? |
sproutster
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Jan-13-06 12:22 PM
Response to Original message |
|
Here due to SC.
Here as mother of child they will effect.
Express concerns for rights and believe JA will threaten.
JA writ and views diff nuance of Right to choose - considering man wrote, urging, ruled on spousal notification - took rights from woman and put into mans hands.
Once branch surrenders to other... Come from state repeatedly abused. Terry Shiavo - ultimately case to SC - can america risk JA in another Terry S case.
Stripsearch 10 y/0 - simply on premisis. Lawyer said JA why bring up search of 10 y/0 girl. JA only one who found stripsearch acceptable.
Would you be comfortable if your little girl was plaintiff. Standard must be higher when vuln children involved.
no question involv in CAP, cred alone do not qaul for SC. I ask you to consider, that JA will replace one of only two women on court.
remembering when woman was first elected - girl could REALLy grow up and be whatever she wanted to be. Message to little girls must be strong.
Today you are guardians - fingerprints have subtly steered - decisions of SC will show in generations. We should zealously guard the judicial branch.
carefully think how role of elected officials by unitary.
|
Mind_your_head
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Jan-13-06 12:23 PM
Response to Original message |
59. Debbie Wasserman is hitting on every point |
|
CAP
Strip searching a 10 year old girl
Reproductive Rights
Overall Rights for women
She's clear, precise, comfortable with her points.....she's AWESOME!
|
Viva_La_Revolution
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Jan-13-06 12:24 PM
Response to Original message |
|
Associate
Kirkland and Ellis LLP
San Francisco, CA
clerk for Alito
|
sasha031
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Jan-13-06 12:26 PM
Response to Reply #63 |
doublethink
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Jan-13-06 12:27 PM
Response to Reply #63 |
67. Another 1 year suck up. |
|
IMHO .... this tv time ought to give these interns quite a boost in their careers. Ho hum. Peace. :)
|
FreedomAngel82
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Jan-13-06 12:56 PM
Response to Reply #67 |
119. Anyone else over one year? |
|
Interesting how they're only having people who worked with him for ONE year!!! What about longer?
|
dogday
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Jan-13-06 12:24 PM
Response to Original message |
64. What? Mrs. Alito did not cry during Debbie's |
|
speech? You would of thought, she would of run out of the room they way Debbie was talking about his treatment of women's and individual rights....
|
EFerrari
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Jan-13-06 12:25 PM
Response to Reply #64 |
65. Are they there today? n/t |
dogday
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Jan-13-06 12:30 PM
Response to Reply #65 |
76. Hopefully they are catching this on TV |
|
you know they are watching this.
|
DemonFighterLives
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Jan-13-06 12:27 PM
Response to Reply #64 |
68. I'm sure she is bawling wherever she is |
|
There's a tear in my beer. :toast:
|
in_cog_ni_to
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Jan-13-06 12:28 PM
Response to Original message |
69. OMG...this guy cannot be for real! |
|
*sigh* Now I'm depressed. Doesn't he know what these people are doing to our consitution?
|
sproutster
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Jan-13-06 12:28 PM
Response to Original message |
70. Jack White NCAAP ACLU |
|
context - pers info - son of AA parents in segr south. Respect led to ACLU and NCAAP. Encouraged to serve country after west point. When worked for JA I saw his duty, respect ...
Thourough eval of every case - uniformly applied relevant law. every case most important case. No waverying from consistant.
abiding loyalty instead of personal or political ideology.
conspic absense of personal motivated specific outcome. wide variety. left without knowing personal beliefs.
Inspired collect support former law clerks
Law clerks, fellow judges, new lawyer - treated everyone with dignity and respect. one occasion, he had parents come to chambers - over hour later, parent left knowing how great he was (paraphrase that one)
Regard for limited role of judiciary in constitution. ...OMG
|
EFerrari
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Jan-13-06 12:30 PM
Response to Reply #70 |
75. Has confidence that Alito will rule on laws that affect him - |
|
Liar. At the level of privilize White has attained, he believes he is safe from the predations of the law.
|
Sydnie
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Jan-13-06 12:31 PM
Response to Reply #75 |
79. Or at the very least that |
|
he will now know people in high places that can look at things in a favorable light for him.
|
adigal
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Jan-13-06 12:42 PM
Response to Reply #75 |
108. Isn't he a DEM witness??? |
|
What the hell???? Is this a double cross??
|
Viva_La_Revolution
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Jan-13-06 12:29 PM
Response to Original message |
71. Reginald M. Turner, Jr. |
|
President
National Bar Association
Washington, DC
|
Viva_La_Revolution
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Jan-13-06 12:30 PM
Response to Reply #71 |
77. Results of our review are troubling... |
Mind_your_head
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Jan-13-06 12:29 PM
Response to Original message |
72. Do law clerks typically only work for one year? |
|
Jack White, Former clerk for Alito 2003-04
|
Sydnie
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Jan-13-06 12:30 PM
Response to Reply #72 |
74. Yes,. Usually only one year. n/t |
Dinger
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Jan-13-06 12:29 PM
Response to Original message |
73. Is There A List Of Which Dems Will Vote How? |
|
I was just wondering who the traitors are that will lose their jobs, now, or in 2008.
|
izzybeans
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Jan-13-06 12:30 PM
Response to Original message |
DemonFighterLives
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Jan-13-06 12:33 PM
Response to Reply #78 |
|
He doesn't support individual rights. Alit was attracted to law by disagreeing with warren 1 person 1 vote
|
doublethink
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Jan-13-06 12:37 PM
Response to Reply #78 |
96. For a second there ...... |
|
I thought Kobe and Shaq finally agreed on something! .... National Basketball Association .... oh never-mind. :dunce:
|
CornField
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Jan-13-06 12:32 PM
Response to Original message |
80. Time for CornField's SQOD (Stupid Question of the Day) |
|
Could O'Connor pull her resignation from the court?
|
in_cog_ni_to
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Jan-13-06 12:33 PM
Response to Reply #80 |
83. yes she can and I wish she would.. n/t |
Viva_La_Revolution
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Jan-13-06 12:33 PM
Response to Reply #80 |
84. Not a stupid question at all |
|
I wonder if we can track down an e-mail address for her.
I'd be willing to write her, and BEG for her to!
|
in_cog_ni_to
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Jan-13-06 12:37 PM
Response to Reply #84 |
94. At THIS point she only has 10 more months to serve. Why not wait? |
|
Edited on Fri Jan-13-06 12:39 PM by in_cog_ni_to
Payback for Reagan nominating her, I fear.:( I wonder if it's in Justice's contracts that IF THEY RETIRE, it MUST be done during their parties term? I bet it is.
|
gkhouston
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Jan-13-06 12:38 PM
Response to Reply #94 |
101. no. They serve as long as they like. There is no |
in_cog_ni_to
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Jan-13-06 12:42 PM
Response to Reply #101 |
109. That's not what I mean. DO THEY HAVE TO PROMISE THAT IF THEY |
|
retire, they will do it during their party's term? Meaning: Reagan appointed Sandra Day O'Connor. Did she have to promise that IF she retired she would do it during a REPUBLICAN'S term?:) Or is it just an "understood" thing?
|
gkhouston
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Jan-13-06 01:03 PM
Response to Reply #109 |
121. no. AFAIK, they don't make have to make any promises to |
|
anyone. It's not like such a promise could be enforced and justices often outlive the people who nominate and vote for them. But if she didn't want to be replaced by a liberal judge, she wouldn't want to retire with a Dem in office, now would she? She might not have wanted to be replaced by someone like Alito, but with her husband's health and her own advancing age, she might not feel that there's a lot of choice in the situation.
|
DemonFighterLives
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Jan-13-06 12:34 PM
Response to Reply #80 |
87. I think she could but her hubby has Alzheimers and she wants to |
CornField
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Jan-13-06 12:38 PM
Response to Reply #87 |
102. Ahhh, I didn't know that. |
|
I do wish she could find it within her to stay, but I understand her reasoning if she leaves.
|
DemonFighterLives
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Jan-13-06 12:42 PM
Response to Reply #102 |
|
My mom died 1 year ago from Alzheimers. It was a nasty disease.
|
Sydnie
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Jan-13-06 12:34 PM
Response to Reply #80 |
88. She could I suppose but she won't |
|
Edited on Fri Jan-13-06 12:35 PM by Sydnie
Her husband is very ill, as I understand it. She wants to spend some time with him. I can understand that. I wish she didn't have that issue to deal with and could stay for life.
Edited to add - She wanted a Republican President to appoint her replacement too.
|
in_cog_ni_to
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Jan-13-06 12:32 PM
Response to Original message |
81. GOOD. Mr.Turner from National Bar Assoc.....we do not support this nominee |
sasha031
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Jan-13-06 12:33 PM
Response to Reply #81 |
gkhouston
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Jan-13-06 12:35 PM
Response to Reply #81 |
|
Edited on Fri Jan-13-06 12:35 PM by gkhouston
:wow:
the Dems should pound that little nugget into everyone's head.
|
AlCzervik
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Jan-13-06 12:35 PM
Response to Reply #81 |
90. holy hell!! that is big! Did he say why? |
in_cog_ni_to
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Jan-13-06 12:38 PM
Response to Reply #90 |
100. Same reasons we have. ;) |
Dinger
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Jan-13-06 12:44 PM
Response to Reply #81 |
112. Saw Him On C-Spin Earlier This Week |
Mind_your_head
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Jan-13-06 12:34 PM
Response to Original message |
86. No support from National Bar Association for Alito! |
|
Reginald Turner says that the Bar has only disapproved of 3 of bush's nominations (out of 150-something?), and Alito's nomination is ONE of the THREE that they OPPOSE! Yes!
|
sasha031
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Jan-13-06 12:36 PM
Response to Reply #86 |
|
i was hoping they would come out. :headbang:
|
dogday
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Jan-13-06 12:36 PM
Response to Original message |
91. Alito against Civil Rights 85% of the time |
Sydnie
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Jan-13-06 12:37 PM
Response to Reply #91 |
97. And the other 15% must have been with a corporation being |
Tesla
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Jan-13-06 12:38 PM
Response to Reply #91 |
|
National Bar Association!!!!
|
sproutster
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Jan-13-06 12:37 PM
Response to Original message |
|
National Bar Assos - created because black members were not allowed into ABA
JA was eval - results troubling, cannot support nom. Not taking lightly. We've only taken position for support for 3 Bush nominee. Understand credentials - Not enough for SC. Strong believe Nom must share belief civil rights.
Critical - adopted standard if fed nom to advance slow but sted equality. Unfort. legal not as color blind. O'conner - society of our own race matters.
Stat and legal that extends liberty to all americans. JA lawyer and judge hostility to basic rights and liberties. His phil as lawyer - in app express disagree to fund rights. indicated, attrac constituional because disagreements with one person one vote. Under this doc all americans have equal vote.
First time states everywhere - made progress - would not have happened with JA. In addition he mischar programs as quota systems. Promote for disenfranchised. Same time, he listed membership in CAP. Altho writings 20 years old - they reflect decisions when judge. - shows record
frequent dissenter - 90% dissent more conservative - reject views of other judges - submachine guns. opposed civil rights protections - advocated civil right wrongs 80% time sex discrim properly brought to court - he dissent grudy - majority critizise say he rubber stamp evidentury burden, evisorated - protect emp liability, even conscience racial bias.
America step forward for benifit and protection.
|
sasha031
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Jan-13-06 12:39 PM
Response to Reply #98 |
104. you are doing a fantastic job |
EFerrari
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Jan-13-06 12:38 PM
Response to Original message |
103. Who is listening beside Specter? |
DemonFighterLives
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Jan-13-06 12:40 PM
Response to Reply #103 |
106. I think they went to the Rosenbaum Memorial |
|
I can't vouch for them though.
|
Viva_La_Revolution
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Jan-13-06 12:40 PM
Response to Original message |
sproutster
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Jan-13-06 01:01 PM
Response to Reply #105 |
|
Statistical info re: racial jury DP cases - JA found no cause to reject this right hand left hand... Any ring to you in community - starteling facts. legal defense fund, money into discrimination in DP. JA comparison of race discrim - right to left trivilized problem. Philadelphia terrible intentional discr in jury selection.
Continuing challange facing - voting rights act. Every day battle - every part of country. Agree wholeheartedly. O'connor - race still matters - not as blind as aspires. Attorneys use racial bias - jurrors are essential - trhoug jury as fact finders - Death row cases - fund principals - JA position - minimize important principals.
How SC looks to all of you? What hopeful of achieving for SC for country: 1. personally more woman justices - also pleased to see Italian American 2. Hispanic - end of day anyone who will give fair shake - prez gives great cause to ponder 3. Important who replacing - someone who is key swing vote for woman and minorities. 4. SC reflects for whom entrusting laws, in absense of AA - JA great. 5. SC greatest assest - fail or appointments, critical for advancement, security, and productivity. 6. Hispanic - concerned about substance - court divided with narrow 5/4 o'conner in all of decisions.
|
Dinger
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Jan-13-06 12:46 PM
Response to Original message |
113. Please, What Is The Deal With The ABA/Senate Pick Slip/Blue Slip Thing? |
|
Edited on Fri Jan-13-06 12:46 PM by Dinger
I asked this a while ago, but forgot. Was it a Senate or ABA tradition (about 50 years) that chimpy stopped, oh, around March 2001? I'm not a lwayer, and would love a quickie refresher. My reason is they atlk about the ABA "approval" of Scalito, but this has not made it into the enws anywhere. If I could only remember what it is called! It has something to do with the approval of someone on the federal bench, I think.
|
sproutster
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Jan-13-06 12:47 PM
Response to Original message |
|
last witness - come to point - written testimony. request it be put into record.
Do not relish our decision. Take no position for fed courts - not here with pleasure. not challange int. or char. it takes us on low road where all diminished. Many fine people have testified both sides. imp people of good will will differ or take diff positions.
Nothing remarkable about collegues taking positions in support of this nom. Heady to know someone nom. They know him personal. Not about personality.
We are compelled to testify in opposition based on standard.
If you want to know, look at record - we have done, on basis that we have arrived at postition.
Want to encourage to read our report, it convinced us will cause substantial shift in civil rights.
In his 15 years - his records in civil right extremely troubled
emp discr African Americans - Twice Grey case - Where JA took posit. to us, issue whether jury, if it should go to jury. found to be discrimintory, under law as maj saw it, and alot support. an inference can be drawn, jury would see discriminatory - JA worked hard to decide should not go to jury. symptamatic of Civil rights issues.
JA harbors a bias - we are not saying this. Whatever his reasons for ruling, record is consistantly clear and as report indicates.
Not just aa's woman and others civil rights
Want to point to deep concern.
The analagy of baseball popular. JA at one time, said - AA harlen alltime hero if the fences had been moved in by affirmative action. It's not about the fence being moved, it's about the tape and the opportunity to play the game. Fundimental diff to view world in regards to race today. No one wants to move fence today.
Told he will be certainly be confirmed - cannot take position based on hope, must take postion to oppose.
|
Mist
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Jan-13-06 12:48 PM
Response to Reply #114 |
115. "Can't take a position based on hope-we take a position based on |
|
his record." That's it in a nutshell. Just look to Alito's record.
|
sproutster
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Jan-13-06 12:54 PM
Response to Original message |
|
What view on race?
Mr shaw says not about personality, not about person. disagree - when testifying says has open mind. Treats everyone the same. Mentioned looks at every case with open mind. Not personal. Disagree is personal. on street only AA - can walk down street without being profiled - JA ruled on that
Do views of Judge lewis or mr white have any...
Agrees about these guys have good feelings about working with im - interrupted by spector.
Our view is based on record, writings, and rulings from bench - which have presented ultra conservative against woman minorities - pro employers --- shut down
Think if reject someone better?
recognize prez can pick whomever - but americans have right that he wont nominate extremest. His collegus -- interrupted...
What about womans issues and in favor of government (to his clerks)
approached case - respect for law enforsement - treated defen in fair and open. Understand comments about personal - do think 15 year record to find what like and dislike - no opportunity to know him as she has... testimony has shown, he always ruled fairly for little guy.
|
sproutster
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Jan-13-06 01:05 PM
Response to Original message |
|
Not going over q's already asked
Cant resist - asked JA several q's about Terry Shiavo. I was offended by number people elect running for cameras grandstand on family tragady. Overrule state of florida - ... some congress attack judges who upheld ruling. constitutional for bush to intervene - congress supoena ... Mention this sad outrageous conduct of people who know better - attakcing independence of judicial. do you have sense whether JA will value this independence - asking in regards to Bush powers
JA emblematic of TS case - privacy extrem import everyone invading family, trying to overturn, if case went to SC - how would JA ruled? zelously guard leg authority. Someone need support checks and balances.
|
pinto
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Jan-13-06 01:08 PM
Response to Original message |
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Thu Apr 25th 2024, 04:39 AM
Response to Original message |