Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Official Alito Hearing Thread – Day 5 – Thread 3

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
 
Viva_La_Revolution Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-13-06 12:01 PM
Original message
Official Alito Hearing Thread – Day 5 – Thread 3
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
helderheid Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-13-06 12:03 PM
Response to Original message
1. thank you Viva!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Viva_La_Revolution Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-13-06 12:03 PM
Response to Original message
2. Back in Session
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Occulus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-13-06 12:03 PM
Response to Original message
3. kicking to get people here instead of thread 2 n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sydnie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-13-06 12:03 PM
Response to Original message
4. Thank you Viva n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EST Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-13-06 12:04 PM
Response to Original message
5. This day is the most important of all the hearings.
I feel honored to share the same world with some of them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sydnie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-13-06 12:04 PM
Response to Reply #5
9. It is humbling, isn't it? n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EST Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-13-06 12:52 PM
Response to Reply #9
116. Yeah-makes a human feel like here is a new chance
to finally make up for those times I missed or chances I didn't take.
The empire is doomed-long live the empire!

In the presence of greatness.
:-)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
in_cog_ni_to Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-13-06 12:04 PM
Response to Original message
6. Debbie Wasserman Schultz! Yay!
She's at the table! I LOVE that woman! I love listening to her and her "Gang of 30-something" on the House floor! She ROCKS!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FreedomAngel82 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-13-06 12:41 PM
Response to Reply #6
107. She kicks ass
Edited on Fri Jan-13-06 12:41 PM by FreedomAngel82
I love listening to her and Tim Ryan on the floor in the House and anyone they bring a long. There are so many good democrats like her who I sometimes wish were in the Senate because they have more balls than some democratic senators.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CornField Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-13-06 12:04 PM
Response to Original message
7. I'm really ticked off at Sessions
How dare he discuss the discriminatory laws which were removed in his state and equate those with stare decisis in overturning privacy laws set by the Supreme Court!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
in_cog_ni_to Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-13-06 12:07 PM
Response to Reply #7
14. Sessions did that???!!!
I'm not surprised. I'm actaully surprised he isn't a member of the KKK. He strikes me as the type that would be a member.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
atreides1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-13-06 12:08 PM
Response to Reply #14
17. HEY
Just because he doesn't wear a white cloak and hood, doesn't mean he isn't a member.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
in_cog_ni_to Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-13-06 12:13 PM
Response to Reply #17
33. Good point. You're right.
:hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CornField Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-13-06 12:09 PM
Response to Reply #14
18. He sucked up to the Civil Rights attorney on the panel
Got the fellow to start talking about how he set off to "dismantle anything to do with segregation" -- then turned it at the end to talk about the laws which were overturned and how, sometimes, stare decisis isn't such a good thing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
in_cog_ni_to Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-13-06 12:12 PM
Response to Reply #18
29. ~~~~picking jaw up off the floor!~~~~~
UNFREAKINBELIEVABLE! I detest that little whiny ass racist bastard.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EFerrari Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-13-06 12:17 PM
Response to Reply #18
43. It wasn't sucking up. He was condescending to that gentleman
in racist double speak. He was hoping to loosen him up and trip him up, smiling all the while. The witness didn't oblige.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CornField Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-13-06 12:23 PM
Response to Reply #43
61. I equate "sucking up" with being condescending
Put it this way, I've never had anyone suck up to me with good intentions.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EFerrari Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-13-06 12:37 PM
Response to Reply #61
95. Got it!
:)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Surya Gayatri Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-13-06 12:08 PM
Response to Reply #7
16. Insidious & underhanded
comparison. Hardly comparable with 200 years of Supreme Court precedent. But what else can you expect from Slither Sessions? SG
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Viva_La_Revolution Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-13-06 12:13 PM
Response to Reply #16
34. Slither!
Perfect! Slimey didn't quite fit, Snake didn't either...

Slither Sessions!

:rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Surya Gayatri Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-13-06 12:21 PM
Response to Reply #34
53. In connection with him,
the word "ooze" also comes to mind--but that just doesn't have the same alliterative charm! :evilgrin: SG
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
yourout Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-13-06 12:04 PM
Response to Original message
8. Alito parrot coming up?
This will be informative......not.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
doublethink Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-13-06 12:07 PM
Response to Reply #8
13. Yea this first one Kate Pringle ........
Edited on Fri Jan-13-06 12:08 PM by doublethink
worked a whole year ....... 1 year under this guy. Great testimonial to his life long ambitions, values, etc... etc... Peace. :crazy:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CornField Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-13-06 12:05 PM
Response to Original message
10. Kate Pringle -- former clerk for Alito -- says she's a Dem
Yup, sure... right.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
yourout Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-13-06 12:06 PM
Response to Reply #10
11. Me thinks we need to do a little digging.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Witch Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-13-06 12:10 PM
Response to Reply #11
23. here
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sydnie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-13-06 12:11 PM
Response to Reply #23
26. I was just reading that too. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
yourout Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-13-06 12:09 PM
Response to Reply #10
20. How can a woman Dem look at this guys record and support him?
Mind boggling.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Czolgosz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-13-06 12:36 PM
Response to Reply #20
92. Self interest. Having served under Alito, she can market herself as "the
democrat lawyer who has a personal-professional connection with Alito," a valuable legal niche if Alito is elevated to the Supreme Court. If Alito is elevated, and someone has an important case before the court, who better than his former clerk to advise how best to calculate the legal arguments to sway him?

Of course Alito's former clerk favors Alito; her connection with him will make her rich, but only if Alito is elevated.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PatsFan2004 Donating Member (245 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-13-06 12:12 PM
Response to Reply #10
31. I think that Rove would not miss on making sure that a
registered DEM Alito clerk would testify. Why get a Repuke clerk to pretend to be a DEM when you can probably find a deluded DEM clerk?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mind_your_head Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-13-06 12:06 PM
Response to Original message
12. She worked for him for ONE YEAR 1993-1994
That was, ehm, 11-12 YEARS AGO!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
doublethink Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-13-06 12:10 PM
Response to Reply #12
21. Damn I was beginging to think her speech .......
right now was about to take as long as she worked for the guy. :crazy:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mind_your_head Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-13-06 12:12 PM
Response to Reply #21
30. LOL
:rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
doublethink Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-13-06 12:10 PM
Response to Reply #12
22. Delete
Edited on Fri Jan-13-06 12:11 PM by doublethink
Dupe post.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
in_cog_ni_to Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-13-06 12:08 PM
Response to Original message
15. How does Debbie Wasserman Schultz fit in this???
Anyone know?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sproutster Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-13-06 12:09 PM
Response to Original message
19. Alito Clerk Kate Pringle
He is mentor - explain briefly clerk job - give research, assist in analysis- unusually close relationship.

Then as now active democrate - heard rumor conservative - thought contentious. Found different. His approach not personal, but hard work and devotions. Share several things
1. work cases bottom up. not top down
come to each case open mind
work carefully from analasys
no personal agenda - methodical - demanding read and reread and relevant decisions. worked hard on each case large and small - divorsed from personal and biased
2. Respect different views. selects law firms diff back and views. in exper never dismissive of any pov. Never caustic or rude. Respectful of fellow judges - sought consensous, respectful when dissenting. Reflected by advocation of other judges here.
3. cog of limited role as estab by written law, never personal agenda. Showed honesty and justice. JA thoughtful and generous boss. no personal arrogance. My pleasure to work for him. both men and women Repug and Dem all came to support him he will be outstanding.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
yourout Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-13-06 12:11 PM
Response to Reply #19
27. "Keep an open mind'
That's a good one.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sydnie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-13-06 12:10 PM
Response to Original message
24. You know, all these former clerks have to be looked at in a
different light. They have something to gain if he is confirmed. It will boost their own resume to be able to say that they clerked for a judge that went on to be on the Supreme Court. We can't lose sight of their motivation in this area.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EFerrari Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-13-06 12:12 PM
Response to Reply #24
28. That's right. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Binka Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-13-06 12:14 PM
Response to Reply #24
36. They Would Like To Work With Him Again
They are angling for position and power. Sycophants!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Viva_La_Revolution Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-13-06 12:15 PM
Response to Reply #36
39. Hi Binka!
How's your boy doing?

Stateside yet?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sasha031 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-13-06 12:18 PM
Response to Reply #24
49. Debbie Wasserman Schultz
:headbang:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Viva_La_Revolution Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-13-06 12:11 PM
Response to Original message
25. Rep. Gonzalez up now
Edited on Fri Jan-13-06 12:12 PM by Viva_La_Revolution
Hispanic caucus is greatly concerned

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CornField Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-13-06 12:13 PM
Response to Reply #25
32. Hispanic Caucus
Dicussing Alito's record on minorities.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EFerrari Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-13-06 12:14 PM
Response to Reply #25
35. We know the nominee will be the President's choice, but
the Supreme Court should not be a mere extension of the Executive Branch.

What you said, hermanito.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DemonFighterLives Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-13-06 12:16 PM
Response to Reply #35
41. Recommend to the Hispanic caucus to oppose this nom.
Wasserman now.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
in_cog_ni_to Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-13-06 12:15 PM
Response to Original message
37. He was on C-SPAN yesterday (?) I think.
He wasn't too fond of ScAlito's rulings.;)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sproutster Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-13-06 12:15 PM
Response to Original message
38. Gonzalas
Hispanic - dismayed none picked. Nation should show diversity. Hispanic extensive exam of nominee - his or her efforts for constitutional authority - supporting political access for all of america. (he talks waaay fast)
Highlight concern - discrimination from basis of ethnicity.
School district voting -
constitutional rights of noncitizens - cited no law for immigrents.
equal opp emp. - deviates from norms to discriminate on race or gender.
we know nom prez wishes. does not mean should be extention of exec branch. That's senate needs to approve.
Limited ques to nom - philosophy under advice and consent. employer of employee, able over disable, etc...
Third countered tendency regardless of status.
If law does not protect you, it will not protect me.
(I really like this guys way of pointing these items out - clear)
should not be cons vs. lib - any should share judicial cong - that law does not protect you it protects no one.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
in_cog_ni_to Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-13-06 12:16 PM
Response to Original message
40. THIS WOMAN IS AWESOME!!!!
Edited on Fri Jan-13-06 12:16 PM by in_cog_ni_to
I bet she doesn't support ScAlito! ;)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Viva_La_Revolution Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-13-06 12:16 PM
Response to Original message
42. Debbie Wasserman Schultz
:applause:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
in_cog_ni_to Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-13-06 12:17 PM
Original message
WOOHOO...REJECT THE NOMINATION.
I knew I could count on her!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lonestarnot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-13-06 12:43 PM
Response to Original message
111. Yeah!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DemonFighterLives Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-13-06 12:18 PM
Response to Reply #42
47. She calls to reject his arse
Blatant disregard of personal rights.
:applause:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CornField Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-13-06 12:19 PM
Response to Reply #42
50. You are considering a nominee... who is comfortable putting a woman's
rights into the hands of her husband the minute a marriage license is signed.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dogday Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-13-06 12:17 PM
Response to Original message
44. Alito shits on civil rights
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CornField Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-13-06 12:17 PM
Response to Original message
45. Where is the committee?
Did the Republicans decide their tender ears couldn't suffer through the truth?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
in_cog_ni_to Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-13-06 12:19 PM
Response to Reply #45
51. They're a bunch of assholes. They can't HANDLE THE TRUTH!!!
:grr:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dogday Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-13-06 12:18 PM
Response to Original message
46. Spector looks uncomfortable
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Viva_La_Revolution Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-13-06 12:18 PM
Response to Original message
48. whoo hoo! a dig at Jebbie!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DemonFighterLives Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-13-06 12:21 PM
Response to Reply #48
55. People should not be in private family stuff Schiavo case
Cap questions.
credentials alone do not make a good justice. he will replace one of only 2 women on Scotus. She was told little girls could grow up and be anything they wanted.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
in_cog_ni_to Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-13-06 12:20 PM
Response to Original message
52. GO DEBBIE!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Witch Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-13-06 12:21 PM
Response to Original message
54. Debbie: Look at Reality, you ideological morons.
:yourock:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sydnie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-13-06 12:22 PM
Response to Reply #54
56. Look at Specter!
Arms crossed and talking with his aids instead of listening. He is a rude asshole!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EFerrari Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-13-06 12:22 PM
Response to Reply #56
57. Yes, he is. On tape.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DemonFighterLives Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-13-06 12:24 PM
Response to Reply #56
62. still trying to explain the magic bullet I presume
Deb Was-shulz rocked their world.
:yourock:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EFerrari Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-13-06 12:23 PM
Response to Reply #54
60. Nice summary. :)
She was perfect.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
janx Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-13-06 12:33 PM
Original message
I'm sorry to have missed her.
She's so passionate and so smart!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FreedomAngel82 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-13-06 12:54 PM
Response to Original message
118. Will there be any video(s)??
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sproutster Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-13-06 12:22 PM
Response to Original message
58. Schultz
Here due to SC.

Here as mother of child they will effect.

Express concerns for rights and believe JA will threaten.

JA writ and views diff nuance of Right to choose - considering man wrote, urging, ruled on spousal notification - took rights from woman and put into mans hands.

Once branch surrenders to other... Come from state repeatedly abused. Terry Shiavo - ultimately case to SC - can america risk JA in another Terry S case.

Stripsearch 10 y/0 - simply on premisis. Lawyer said JA why bring up search of 10 y/0 girl. JA only one who found stripsearch acceptable.

Would you be comfortable if your little girl was plaintiff. Standard must be higher when vuln children involved.

no question involv in CAP, cred alone do not qaul for SC. I ask you to consider, that JA will replace one of only two women on court.

remembering when woman was first elected - girl could REALLy grow up and be whatever she wanted to be. Message to little girls must be strong.

Today you are guardians - fingerprints have subtly steered - decisions of SC will show in generations. We should zealously guard the judicial branch.

carefully think how role of elected officials by unitary.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mind_your_head Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-13-06 12:23 PM
Response to Original message
59. Debbie Wasserman is hitting on every point
CAP

Strip searching a 10 year old girl

Reproductive Rights

Overall Rights for women

She's clear, precise, comfortable with her points.....she's AWESOME!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Viva_La_Revolution Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-13-06 12:24 PM
Response to Original message
63. Jack White


Associate

Kirkland and Ellis LLP

San Francisco, CA

clerk for Alito
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sasha031 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-13-06 12:26 PM
Response to Reply #63
66. Jack White
:nopity:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
doublethink Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-13-06 12:27 PM
Response to Reply #63
67. Another 1 year suck up.
IMHO .... this tv time ought to give these interns quite a boost in their careers. Ho hum. Peace. :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FreedomAngel82 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-13-06 12:56 PM
Response to Reply #67
119. Anyone else over one year?
Interesting how they're only having people who worked with him for ONE year!!! What about longer?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dogday Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-13-06 12:24 PM
Response to Original message
64. What? Mrs. Alito did not cry during Debbie's
speech? You would of thought, she would of run out of the room they way Debbie was talking about his treatment of women's and individual rights....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EFerrari Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-13-06 12:25 PM
Response to Reply #64
65. Are they there today? n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dogday Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-13-06 12:30 PM
Response to Reply #65
76. Hopefully they are catching this on TV
you know they are watching this.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DemonFighterLives Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-13-06 12:27 PM
Response to Reply #64
68. I'm sure she is bawling wherever she is
There's a tear in my beer. :toast:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
in_cog_ni_to Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-13-06 12:28 PM
Response to Original message
69. OMG...this guy cannot be for real!
*sigh* Now I'm depressed. Doesn't he know what these people are doing to our consitution?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sproutster Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-13-06 12:28 PM
Response to Original message
70. Jack White NCAAP ACLU
context - pers info - son of AA parents in segr south. Respect led to ACLU and NCAAP. Encouraged to serve country after west point. When worked for JA I saw his duty, respect ...

Thourough eval of every case - uniformly applied relevant law. every case most important case. No waverying from consistant.

abiding loyalty instead of personal or political ideology.

conspic absense of personal motivated specific outcome. wide variety. left without knowing personal beliefs.

Inspired collect support former law clerks

Law clerks, fellow judges, new lawyer - treated everyone with dignity and respect. one occasion, he had parents come to chambers - over hour later, parent left knowing how great he was (paraphrase that one)

Regard for limited role of judiciary in constitution. ...OMG
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EFerrari Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-13-06 12:30 PM
Response to Reply #70
75. Has confidence that Alito will rule on laws that affect him -
Liar. At the level of privilize White has attained, he believes he is safe from the predations of the law.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sydnie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-13-06 12:31 PM
Response to Reply #75
79. Or at the very least that
he will now know people in high places that can look at things in a favorable light for him.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
adigal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-13-06 12:42 PM
Response to Reply #75
108. Isn't he a DEM witness???
What the hell???? Is this a double cross??
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Viva_La_Revolution Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-13-06 12:29 PM
Response to Original message
71. Reginald M. Turner, Jr.

President

National Bar Association

Washington, DC
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Viva_La_Revolution Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-13-06 12:30 PM
Response to Reply #71
77. Results of our review are troubling...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mind_your_head Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-13-06 12:29 PM
Response to Original message
72. Do law clerks typically only work for one year?
Jack White, Former clerk for Alito 2003-04

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sydnie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-13-06 12:30 PM
Response to Reply #72
74. Yes,. Usually only one year. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dinger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-13-06 12:29 PM
Response to Original message
73. Is There A List Of Which Dems Will Vote How?
I was just wondering who the traitors are that will lose their jobs, now, or in 2008.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
izzybeans Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-13-06 12:30 PM
Response to Original message
78. NBA-no support!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DemonFighterLives Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-13-06 12:33 PM
Response to Reply #78
82. troublesome nominee
He doesn't support individual rights.
Alit was attracted to law by disagreeing with warren 1 person 1 vote
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
doublethink Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-13-06 12:37 PM
Response to Reply #78
96. For a second there ......
I thought Kobe and Shaq finally agreed on something! .... National Basketball Association .... oh never-mind. :dunce:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CornField Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-13-06 12:32 PM
Response to Original message
80. Time for CornField's SQOD (Stupid Question of the Day)
Could O'Connor pull her resignation from the court?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
in_cog_ni_to Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-13-06 12:33 PM
Response to Reply #80
83. yes she can and I wish she would.. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Viva_La_Revolution Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-13-06 12:33 PM
Response to Reply #80
84. Not a stupid question at all
I wonder if we can track down an e-mail address for her.

I'd be willing to write her, and BEG for her to!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
in_cog_ni_to Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-13-06 12:37 PM
Response to Reply #84
94. At THIS point she only has 10 more months to serve. Why not wait?
Edited on Fri Jan-13-06 12:39 PM by in_cog_ni_to
Payback for Reagan nominating her, I fear.:( I wonder if it's in Justice's contracts that IF THEY RETIRE, it MUST be done during their parties term? I bet it is.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gkhouston Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-13-06 12:38 PM
Response to Reply #94
101. no. They serve as long as they like. There is no
term nor "contract".
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
in_cog_ni_to Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-13-06 12:42 PM
Response to Reply #101
109. That's not what I mean. DO THEY HAVE TO PROMISE THAT IF THEY
retire, they will do it during their party's term? Meaning: Reagan appointed Sandra Day O'Connor. Did she have to promise that IF she retired she would do it during a REPUBLICAN'S term?:) Or is it just an "understood" thing?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gkhouston Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-13-06 01:03 PM
Response to Reply #109
121. no. AFAIK, they don't make have to make any promises to
anyone. It's not like such a promise could be enforced and justices often outlive the people who nominate and vote for them. But if she didn't want to be replaced by a liberal judge, she wouldn't want to retire with a Dem in office, now would she? She might not have wanted to be replaced by someone like Alito, but with her husband's health and her own advancing age, she might not feel that there's a lot of choice in the situation.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DemonFighterLives Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-13-06 12:34 PM
Response to Reply #80
87. I think she could but her hubby has Alzheimers and she wants to
be with him.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CornField Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-13-06 12:38 PM
Response to Reply #87
102. Ahhh, I didn't know that.
I do wish she could find it within her to stay, but I understand her reasoning if she leaves.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DemonFighterLives Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-13-06 12:42 PM
Response to Reply #102
110. yeah it is sad
My mom died 1 year ago from Alzheimers. It was a nasty disease.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sydnie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-13-06 12:34 PM
Response to Reply #80
88. She could I suppose but she won't
Edited on Fri Jan-13-06 12:35 PM by Sydnie
Her husband is very ill, as I understand it. She wants to spend some time with him. I can understand that. I wish she didn't have that issue to deal with and could stay for life.

Edited to add - She wanted a Republican President to appoint her replacement too.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
in_cog_ni_to Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-13-06 12:32 PM
Response to Original message
81. GOOD. Mr.Turner from National Bar Assoc.....we do not support this nominee
:thumbsup:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sasha031 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-13-06 12:33 PM
Response to Reply #81
85. Mr.Turner
:applause:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gkhouston Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-13-06 12:35 PM
Response to Reply #81
89. ...
Edited on Fri Jan-13-06 12:35 PM by gkhouston
:wow:


the Dems should pound that little nugget into everyone's head.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AlCzervik Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-13-06 12:35 PM
Response to Reply #81
90. holy hell!! that is big! Did he say why?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
in_cog_ni_to Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-13-06 12:38 PM
Response to Reply #90
100. Same reasons we have. ;)
:hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dinger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-13-06 12:44 PM
Response to Reply #81
112. Saw Him On C-Spin Earlier This Week
He was pretty good.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mind_your_head Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-13-06 12:34 PM
Response to Original message
86. No support from National Bar Association for Alito!
Reginald Turner says that the Bar has only disapproved of 3 of bush's nominations (out of 150-something?), and Alito's nomination is ONE of the THREE that they OPPOSE! Yes!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sasha031 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-13-06 12:36 PM
Response to Reply #86
93. this is powerful
i was hoping they would come out. :headbang:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dogday Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-13-06 12:36 PM
Response to Original message
91. Alito against Civil Rights 85% of the time
need I say more?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sydnie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-13-06 12:37 PM
Response to Reply #91
97. And the other 15% must have been with a corporation being
viewed as a person.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tesla Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-13-06 12:38 PM
Response to Reply #91
99. WOW!!!!
National Bar Association!!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sproutster Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-13-06 12:37 PM
Response to Original message
98. Turner
National Bar Assos - created because black members were not allowed into ABA

JA was eval - results troubling, cannot support nom. Not taking lightly. We've only taken position for support for 3 Bush nominee. Understand credentials - Not enough for SC. Strong believe Nom must share belief civil rights.

Critical - adopted standard if fed nom to advance slow but sted equality. Unfort. legal not as color blind. O'conner - society of our own race matters.

Stat and legal that extends liberty to all americans. JA lawyer and judge hostility to basic rights and liberties. His phil as lawyer - in app express disagree to fund rights. indicated, attrac constituional because disagreements with one person one vote. Under this doc all americans have equal vote.

First time states everywhere - made progress - would not have happened with JA. In addition he mischar programs as quota systems. Promote for disenfranchised. Same time, he listed membership in CAP. Altho writings 20 years old - they reflect decisions when judge. - shows record

frequent dissenter - 90% dissent more conservative - reject views of other judges - submachine guns.
opposed civil rights protections - advocated civil right wrongs 80% time
sex discrim properly brought to court - he dissent
grudy - majority critizise say he rubber stamp
evidentury burden, evisorated - protect emp liability, even conscience racial bias.

America step forward for benifit and protection.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sasha031 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-13-06 12:39 PM
Response to Reply #98
104. you are doing a fantastic job
greatly appreciated
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EFerrari Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-13-06 12:38 PM
Response to Original message
103. Who is listening beside Specter?
:nuke:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DemonFighterLives Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-13-06 12:40 PM
Response to Reply #103
106. I think they went to the Rosenbaum Memorial
I can't vouch for them though.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Viva_La_Revolution Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-13-06 12:40 PM
Response to Original message
105. Thread 4 is up!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sproutster Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-13-06 01:01 PM
Response to Reply #105
120. Kennedy
Statistical info re: racial jury DP cases - JA found no cause to reject this right hand left hand...
Any ring to you in community - starteling facts.
legal defense fund, money into discrimination in DP. JA comparison of race discrim - right to left trivilized problem. Philadelphia terrible intentional discr in jury selection.

Continuing challange facing - voting rights act. Every day battle - every part of country.
Agree wholeheartedly. O'connor - race still matters - not as blind as aspires. Attorneys use racial bias - jurrors are essential - trhoug jury as fact finders - Death row cases - fund principals - JA position - minimize important principals.

How SC looks to all of you?
What hopeful of achieving for SC for country:
1. personally more woman justices - also pleased to see Italian American
2. Hispanic - end of day anyone who will give fair shake - prez gives great cause to ponder
3. Important who replacing - someone who is key swing vote for woman and minorities.
4. SC reflects for whom entrusting laws, in absense of AA - JA great.
5. SC greatest assest - fail or appointments, critical for advancement, security, and productivity.
6. Hispanic - concerned about substance - court divided with narrow 5/4 o'conner in all of decisions.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dinger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-13-06 12:46 PM
Response to Original message
113. Please, What Is The Deal With The ABA/Senate Pick Slip/Blue Slip Thing?
Edited on Fri Jan-13-06 12:46 PM by Dinger
I asked this a while ago, but forgot. Was it a Senate or ABA tradition (about 50 years) that chimpy stopped, oh, around March 2001? I'm not a lwayer, and would love a quickie refresher. My reason is they atlk about the ABA "approval" of Scalito, but this has not made it into the enws anywhere. If I could only remember what it is called!
It has something to do with the approval of someone on the federal bench, I think.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sproutster Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-13-06 12:47 PM
Response to Original message
114. Shaw
last witness - come to point - written testimony. request it be put into record.

Do not relish our decision. Take no position for fed courts - not here with pleasure. not challange int. or char. it takes us on low road where all diminished. Many fine people have testified both sides. imp people of good will will differ or take diff positions.

Nothing remarkable about collegues taking positions in support of this nom. Heady to know someone nom. They know him personal. Not about personality.

We are compelled to testify in opposition based on standard.

If you want to know, look at record - we have done, on basis that we have arrived at postition.

Want to encourage to read our report, it convinced us will cause substantial shift in civil rights.

In his 15 years - his records in civil right extremely troubled

emp discr African Americans - Twice
Grey case - Where JA took posit. to us, issue whether jury, if it should go to jury. found to be discrimintory, under law as maj saw it, and alot support. an inference can be drawn, jury would see discriminatory - JA worked hard to decide should not go to jury. symptamatic of Civil rights issues.

JA harbors a bias - we are not saying this. Whatever his reasons for ruling, record is consistantly clear and as report indicates.

Not just aa's woman and others civil rights

Want to point to deep concern.

The analagy of baseball popular. JA at one time, said - AA harlen alltime hero if the fences had been moved in by affirmative action. It's not about the fence being moved, it's about the tape and the opportunity to play the game. Fundimental diff to view world in regards to race today. No one wants to move fence today.

Told he will be certainly be confirmed - cannot take position based on hope, must take postion to oppose.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-13-06 12:48 PM
Response to Reply #114
115. "Can't take a position based on hope-we take a position based on
his record." That's it in a nutshell. Just look to Alito's record.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sproutster Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-13-06 12:54 PM
Response to Original message
117. Spector
What view on race?

Mr shaw says not about personality, not about person. disagree - when testifying says has open mind. Treats everyone the same. Mentioned looks at every case with open mind. Not personal. Disagree is personal. on street only AA - can walk down street without being profiled - JA ruled on that

Do views of Judge lewis or mr white have any...

Agrees about these guys have good feelings about working with im - interrupted by spector.

Our view is based on record, writings, and rulings from bench - which have presented ultra conservative against woman minorities - pro employers --- shut down

Think if reject someone better?

recognize prez can pick whomever - but americans have right that he wont nominate extremest. His collegus -- interrupted...

What about womans issues and in favor of government
(to his clerks)

approached case - respect for law enforsement - treated defen in fair and open. Understand comments about personal - do think 15 year record to find what like and dislike - no opportunity to know him as she has...
testimony has shown, he always ruled fairly for little guy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sproutster Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-13-06 01:05 PM
Response to Original message
122. Lehey
Not going over q's already asked

Cant resist - asked JA several q's about Terry Shiavo. I was offended by number people elect running for cameras grandstand on family tragady. Overrule state of florida - ... some congress attack judges who upheld ruling. constitutional for bush to intervene - congress supoena ... Mention this sad outrageous conduct of people who know better - attakcing independence of judicial.
do you have sense whether JA will value this independence - asking in regards to Bush powers

JA emblematic of TS case - privacy extrem import everyone invading family, trying to overturn, if case went to SC - how would JA ruled? zelously guard leg authority. Someone need support checks and balances.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pinto Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-13-06 01:08 PM
Response to Original message
123. Thread 4 is here:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 04:39 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC