Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Suckling on the Corporate Teat

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
 
burythehatchet Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-27-06 09:35 AM
Original message
Suckling on the Corporate Teat
Edited on Sat May-27-06 09:36 AM by burythehatchet

My dad always told me that the best way to make a living was to get a job in a big company, keep your head down at work, don't get friendly with anyone, bring home a paycheck, and everything will be fine. As the father of a family of immigrants from a third world country, he knew no better. As a young man in the early 80's, I knew no better.

I entered into the insurance business out of college and spent the next two decades alternating between two states of mind: A contented corporate drone and a deeply unhappy person who knew at his core that this was not the life he wanted to live. With each passing day my state of mind was more and more the latter; I was miserable. Even when I felt contented because I started making more money, I knew that my contentment was based on a false set of values. They did not reflect my own.

What I really wanted to do was be in business for myself. I wanted to work hard to achieve goals with which I could be morally comfortable. I wanted to hire people for whom I could help make a better life because whenever I had to manage people in my corporate job, what I wanted to do for my employees was never in line with the company wanted. But it was getting too late, I was addicted to the steady paycheck. My life was dependent on my bi-weekly on the 1st and the 15th except when those dates fall on a weekend then the previous Friday if the date falls on a Saturday and the following Monday if the date falls on a Sunday. I was suckling on the corporate teat.

The founders of Democratic Underground accomplished a great goal: They built a web presence - a small business - from the ground up and made it a successful venture. For that they should be proud and we should be thankful, as members. This Google ad stuff is the first taste of corporate breast milk. It will taste sweet and the bosom Will be warm. There will be a feeling of well being because we'll never have to go hungry again. But don't be mistaken, the milk is addictive and the teat does not belong to a benevolent momma. Unless DU recognizes that and gets off that breast, we will be there forever, and in the future, some of us may remember when we had the world by the tail, we were independent rabble-rousers and we paid our own way.

We should get off this stuff because its addictive.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Deja Q Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-27-06 09:37 AM
Response to Original message
1. Is this a sex thread?
LOL.

Ask the admins for the balance sheet. Maybe they're in bad financial shape, lot most small businesses - mostly due to ambient cost-of-living prices and how big corporations have a randy desire to stomp on the small ones.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
larrysh Donating Member (181 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-27-06 09:40 AM
Response to Original message
2. I agree
the taking of Corporate money is never a good thing, even for advertising. At some point in time,
someone will post something the Corporate Masters disagree with....and then all hell will break loose!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
A-Schwarzenegger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-27-06 09:43 AM
Response to Original message
3. Just get rid of the ads for people who donate.
Which is under consideration apparently.
I doubt I'd donate again if I got to see those ads.
Just me, y'all.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
burythehatchet Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-27-06 09:47 AM
Response to Reply #3
5. On the surface, on might agree with that modification
But to me it smacks of classism. When the NYTimes went to their Premium option, for example, it eliminated access to anyone who couldn't/wouldn't pay. Its simply not a democratic value in my opinion.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
A-Schwarzenegger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-27-06 09:59 AM
Response to Reply #5
6. Huh? It wouldnt deny access to anybody.
How would eliminating ads for donaters deny
DU access to non-donaters? What am I missing?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
burythehatchet Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-27-06 10:13 AM
Response to Reply #6
7. The NY Times example is not 100% analogous
it was merely pointing out the establishment of classes.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
porphyrian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-27-06 09:43 AM
Response to Original message
4. Dawn of the Dead (the original) is an excellent metaphor...
...for rampant consumerism. Just sayin'.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leftofthedial Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-27-06 10:34 AM
Response to Original message
8. mmmm teats
I like


seriously, you are right.

until Americans reject corporatism--HARSHLY--we will always be swimming upstream.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
burythehatchet Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-27-06 12:34 PM
Response to Reply #8
9. Resistance is not necessarily futile n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
otherlander Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-27-06 12:48 PM
Response to Original message
10. Agreed!
:toast:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rug Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-27-06 01:04 PM
Response to Original message
11. I vote for noncorporate teats.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
burythehatchet Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-27-06 01:09 PM
Response to Reply #11
12. Those would be the natural, non-siliconized versions
far more preferable than the rubbery peaks that look nice in pictures.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 19th 2024, 01:28 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC