Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

The raid on Jefferson's office - a question

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
 
hedgehog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-27-06 03:59 PM
Original message
The raid on Jefferson's office - a question
Forgive me if everyone else already knows this, but did the FBI have a search warrant when they went in or did they just knock down the door? Either way,I should think it puts the Patriot Act in a whole new light for the congress critters.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Montauk6 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-27-06 04:02 PM
Response to Original message
1. Let's see... is Jefferson a Democrat? He IS?
Oh, well then my guess is that they just went in. If he were a Goop, they wouldn't have even paid him a visit.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
larrysh Donating Member (181 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-27-06 04:05 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. Yes, They had a warrant.....
The FBI requested Jefferson provide certain documents on his own, and when he refused they went and got a warrant. Heard that on both CNN and MSNBC.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hedgehog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-27-06 04:08 PM
Response to Reply #2
4. If they had the warrant, why is Hastert calling this a seperation
of powers issue?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lochloosa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-27-06 04:19 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. Here is a good article that lays out the pros and cons
http://www.nola.com/news/t-p/frontpage/index.ssf?/base/news-5/1148711891215860.xml

Matters of contention

There is disagreement among legal scholars whether the raid on Jefferson's congressional office runs afoul of the Constitution, as charged by Jefferson's lawyers and leaders of the House. They say it violated the "speech and debate" clause of the Constitution as well as the separation of powers between the White House and Congress.

Some legal experts aren't so sure. They say the speech and debate clause, which bars members of Congress from being investigated for a speech made on the floor or work related to legislative activity, isn't applicable to the search of an office. The Supreme Court has ruled that the clause prevents members from being arrested for things they say on the House or Senate floor, or actions taken on behalf of legislation, but not for criminal behavior.

The separation of powers draws different views. Some cite the Supreme Court ruling in the Watergate case that required President Nixon to turn over tapes of his White House conversations despite his arguments that to do so would run afoul of the separation of powers clause.

Others argue that while a search of a congressional office might be justified under some situations, the way the search of Jefferson's office was carried out -- without letting a representative of the House counsel's office be present and without parameters worked out in advance with House leaders -- may not be viewed favorably by federal judges. Some say it would be no different if congressional committees that had been denied White House documents for their investigations of the government's response to Hurricane Katrina had sent Capitol Police to the White House to collect the materials.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
uppityperson Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-27-06 04:05 PM
Response to Original message
3. .
Edited on Sat May-27-06 04:06 PM by uppityperson
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sat May 11th 2024, 02:59 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC