Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Will Alito be confirmed? Do bears shit in the woods?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
 
Jersey Devil Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-13-06 02:27 PM
Original message
Will Alito be confirmed? Do bears shit in the woods?
There are consequences to elections and despite the fact that many Democrats tried to point out to voters in 2000 and 2004 that the real importance of those elections were their effect on the Supreme Court, few paid attention. I know that it was my primary focus but I think it was something that very few others paid much attention to.

With a Republican President and a Republican Senate the Court was bound to tilt conservative no matter who the nominees were that were sent to the Senate for confirmation. The only thing the Democrats could do is perhaps block one or two by either bringing out facts that would prove the nominee unacceptable or by using the filibuster. But that would only be temporary because any rejected right winger would simply be replaced by another (as Harriet Meiers was replaced by Alito). In fact, it could prove to be worse.

The hearings were a sick joke and accomplished absolutely nothing since the rules are that the nominee really doesn't have to answer any of the questions. Biden pointed this out yesterday and basically said they ought to just skip the hearings, debate the nominations on the floor of the Senate and vote.

Alito answered none of the questions about his beliefs on issues like abortion, presidential power, etc. I don't hold it against him personally. He was just following the rules set down, ironically by Democrats when they had the majority and said Ginsberg didn't have to answer such questions during her hearings. So, in a sense, Democrats were hoisted by their own petards. Bork was "borked" because he had to answer the questions, so Dems changed the rules so that Republicans could not "bork" Ginsberg. Now they have to live with it.

I am hoping (though I don't think it will happen) that the Democrats filibuster Alito causing the Republicans to invoke the "nuclear option" because some day that will backfire on the Republicans in much the same way the anti-bork hearings have backfired on the Democrats.

Back to "consequences" - When you lose elections you lose control and power. I do think it was necessary to oppose Alito in the hope that more people become aware of what is happening to the Court under conservatives. However, that being said, once he is confirmed, we have to live with it and move on until we have the power to change it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
jsamuel Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-13-06 02:28 PM
Response to Original message
1. Are Bears Catholic? Does the Pope shit in the woods?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jersey Devil Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-13-06 02:31 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. snarky
but admittedly funny. :-)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OneBlueSky Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-13-06 02:36 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. damn . . . ya beat me to it . . . :) n/t
.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
deutsey Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-13-06 03:09 PM
Response to Reply #1
4. No, but bears are the #2 threat to America
according to the Colbert Report.

:evilgrin:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 07:59 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC