Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Alaska - The Climate Change Poster State - USA Today

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
 
mcscajun Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-31-06 10:39 AM
Original message
Alaska - The Climate Change Poster State - USA Today
Edited on Wed May-31-06 10:40 AM by mcscajun
DUer hatrack posted
http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=show_mesg&forum=115&topic_id=55413&mesg_id=55413
this USA Today article yesterday in the Environment/Energy forum and it sank like a stone. I thought it should come to the attention of GD. Even if you think you already know the dangers of global warming, this will bring some items of note to your attention you may not have considered before.
http://www.usatoday.com/weather/climate/2006-05-29-alaska-globalwarming_x.htm?csp=34

A most alarming and depressing article. This will impact everything.
Global warming will change everything from allergies and the spread of disease, to the cost of food and agricultural employment, from hurricanes to home construction. Ugh.

Selected details from the OP article:
Rising temperatures will mean rising milk prises; cows produce less milk when it gets over 80°F. The yield for feed crops and sweet corn will drop as temps rise also. Fruit production is imperiled as "Spring" arrives earlier than it used to, but cold snaps follow older patterns. Fruit trees blossom and the cold snap kills the flowers, wiping out production. California stone fruits (peaches, plums, and nectarines)and snack nuts (almonds and such) don't do well in warmer winters; the trees need some cold in order to bloom and produce their fruits.

Here's another case of offshoring jobs we can't afford to lose; plum producers are on the move.
Packers already are moving some production to Chile. There could soon come a day when California, which grows 95% to 98% of all plums in the USA, is out of the business entirely.


Got allergies? No? Wait a while; you might yet develop some, or if you already have 'em, brace yourself. They're bound to get worse.
U.S. asthma and allergy rates are increasing in part because more carbon dioxide in the atmosphere is supercharging the production of pollen that can trigger them, he says. When carbon dioxide is doubled, ragweed stems grow 10% more but pollen increases by 60%.

"Pollen counts of 120 used to be cause for alert. We're seeing counts like 6,000 now," Epstein says.


And let's not forget the insects that carry diseases; we usually count on freezing temps to kill them off during winter. Hang onto your hats, now.
Warmer winters also mean insects can survive and thrive in places where the cold used to keep them in check. Lyme disease is spreading beyond the former winter confines of the tick that carries it. And West Nile virus is spreading farther because spring drought amplifies the bird-biting mosquito cycle, Epstein says.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
democrank Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-31-06 10:53 AM
Response to Original message
1. Disturbing.
Democrats should make global warming a front-and-center issue in `06 and `08.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
maxsolomon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-31-06 11:00 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. i halfway disagree
global heating is the biggest issue facing mankind, no dispute.

but the murkin people don't have a very good track record of embracing challenge or change. telling them that none of it is their fault & they don't have to wake the fuck up & it is morning in murka is a very successful election strategery.

better to lie & tell them they're the smartest & bravest people on the planet & that everyone else is just jealous.

:sarcasm:, sort of...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mahatmakanejeeves Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-31-06 11:09 AM
Response to Original message
3. "Rising temperatures will mean rising milk prices"
I'm not so certain of that. Is it not generally the case in the US that the states have minimum prices for milk, and that those prices are maintained by artificial price supports? My guess is that all that would happen is that the price supports would shrink, and the price to the consumer would stay the same.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mcscajun Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-31-06 11:13 AM
Response to Reply #3
4. Minimum prices, yes. Maximum prices, no.
There's a floor for the producers/distributors, but no ceiling for consumers.

Lower supply will mean higher prices.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 05:24 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC