Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Wes Clark defends Murtha on Haditha - Bill O'Reilly caves

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
 
Adelante Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-31-06 12:52 PM
Original message
Wes Clark defends Murtha on Haditha - Bill O'Reilly caves
This is on the Securing America site. With permission:

General Wesley Clark on "The O'Reilly Factor"
May 30, 2006
Transcript by Reg NYC


Bill O'Reilly: Now for the top story tonight, another view of this. Joining us from Washington, Fox News military analyst General Wesley Clark.


General, if you were on active duty over in Iraq and you heard Congressman Murtha, you know, 'don't stick up for the military Charlie', you know and, and really bomb throwing, agitating in my opinion, what would you think about that?

General Wesley Clark: Well, I don't think I'd interpret it that way, not quite like you put it Bill. I think that what Congressman Murtha's doing is a legitimate function of the Legislative Branch. He's not part of the Executive Branch of government, and he's getting fed information from the inside. He obviously has had a lot of people who have talked to him about this. He's not making this up, and that's the way he sees it, and he wants to get the facts out.


Look, when these things start to happen, and all of my sources in and around the Pentagon indicate that in fact, something like this instant did happen. It was murder. People were covered up. Now, I haven't seen the investigation, but people who have, are familiar with the facts are reporting these things. And when it happens like that, it's an indicator that you're on the edge of feasibility of your policy. It's an indicator that the, the stress on the units is such that standards of discipline and, and, and performance are, are breaking down at the margin.

Bill O'Reilly: See, I disagree. I disagree.

General Wesley Clark: And it's a real warning for us.

Bill O'Reilly: I disagree. In Iwo Jima, in the Battle of the Bulge, Malmedy, all these things, and you're a military historian. You know these happened. It happened in every war. It's happened in every army, and you're right, it's a breakdown caused by stress, and a breakdown has to be dealt with by the military extremely quickly, effectively.

General Wesley Clark: Yes.

Bill O'Reilly: Murderers, if, if they're deemed guilty in a, in a military court of justice have to be punished. But to draw a wider implication, General, when 95%, and I think you'd agree with that figure, of American forces overseas under tremendous stress are performing heroically every day, to draw a wider implication at this juncture brutally unfair, both to our forces and to our country. What say you?

General Wesley Clark: I say that, first of all, you'll have to show me and prove to me that there were ever any American soldiers in Belgium and Normandy or in Iwo Jima who murdered civilians. Secondly, I think you're too low when you say 95% of the forces are performing effectively. I'd say 99.5% of the forces are performing effectively, maybe higher. But when you have incidents like this, and you have chains of command under enormous stress, that is an indicator that things aren't going right. You've got to be sensitive to those indicators. You've got to fix the problem, otherwise it's going to get worse.

-snip

Bill O'Reilly: But I, in, in Mal-, in, in Malmedy, as you know, US forces captured SS forces who had their hands in the air, and they were unarmed, and they shot them down. You know that. That's on the record, been documented. In Iwo Jima, the same thing occurred. Japanese attempted to surrender, and they were burned in their caves.

General Wesley Clark: Bill, that's a lot different than this.

Bill O'Reilly: Okay. Listen-

General Wesley Clark: These are no forces.

-snip

General Wesley Clark: There's a big difference between-

Bill O'Reilly: But Murtha isn't doing that.

General Wesley Clark: -being in a fire fight and some guy who suddenly, after he's been shooting at you, throws up his hand and says, 'Woop! Now you can't shoot me, because I've put down my weapon.' That's one thing. It's another thing, if it's true as reported, that they broke into homes and shot-

Bill O'Reilly: Okay, but whoa, whoa.

General Wesley Clark: -men, women and children

Bill O'Reilly: I don't wanna, I don't wanna judi- Listen-

General Wesley Clark: That, that's not, that's not the same thing.

-snip

Bill O'Reilly: You're, you're bending over backwards to give him the benefit of the doubt. Maybe I'm wrong. I'll admit.

General Wesley Clark: I'm just telling you what, the way I see it.

Bill O'Reilly: May- I know. Maybe I'm wrong about it. I'd like, I'd like to talk to the man face to face like we're talking to. General, thanks as always.


Video and full transcript:

http://securingamerica.com/node/1047

:patriot:

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
ronnykmarshall Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-31-06 12:58 PM
Response to Original message
1. Al's playing the clip.
Wes Clark chewed Billy boy up and spit him out.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Texas_Kat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-31-06 01:00 PM
Response to Original message
2. Clark never backs down
I love a Democrat who knows how to Stand and Fight!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Skidmore Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-31-06 01:07 PM
Response to Reply #2
7. Wes Clark is my choice to lead the ticket in 08 because
he understands the horror of war and he has decency to return to war as a last resort. After *, Cheney, and Rummy have finished decimating our forces, we will need a man with his qualities to sort things out. I also think he has a really good grasp of domestic issues and because he has experience in nation building, he will be able to oversee the rebuilding of America.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Adelante Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-31-06 01:08 PM
Response to Reply #2
9. He always tells the truth
We may not like to hear it sometimes, but we ALWAYS know it is the truth.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Virginia Dare Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-31-06 01:00 PM
Response to Original message
3. The gauntlet is down...
O'Reilly wants to talk to Murtha face to face. I'd like to see that too. I'd like to see Murtha wipe the floor with O'Reilly's face.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
zulchzulu Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-31-06 01:00 PM
Response to Original message
4. Murtha should go on O'Lielly's show and give him a smackdown
I'd love to see John hand Billy Boy his butt back into his piehole. It would be easy. Billy is no match for Murtha...or my dog for that matter...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Coexist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-31-06 01:01 PM
Response to Original message
5. Thank you for posting this - do you know if there is any video?
I have checked canofun and crooksandliars.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Adelante Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-31-06 01:06 PM
Response to Reply #5
6. Video link at bottom of OP, FLDem
:)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Coexist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-31-06 01:07 PM
Response to Reply #6
8. Oops - thanks - watching now!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Deacon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-31-06 01:24 PM
Response to Reply #8
11. Is that transcript correct?
'Cause if I were Wes I would have pointed out to Falafel Boy that the S.S. shot U.S. POWs at Malmedy - and they hadn't just "dropped their weapons", either, they had been marched to a particular place for the purpose of machine gunning them. This was established at the trial of the S.S. officers responsible.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Adelante Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-31-06 01:27 PM
Response to Reply #11
14. They're talking about American soldiers shooting civilians
Not the SS.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Deacon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-31-06 01:32 PM
Response to Reply #14
17. Nope
Falafel Boy clearly states that U.S. soldiers shot unarmed S.S. soldiers at Malmedy in Belgium during the Battle of the Bulge - exactly the opposite of what actually happened.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Adelante Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-31-06 01:36 PM
Response to Reply #17
20. Yes
But it's not apposite to the Haditha incident, which is what Clark's response shows.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PublicWrath Donating Member (597 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-31-06 04:21 PM
Response to Reply #17
40. Yep. And it's not the first time he's brought this up. To Clark, in fact.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Aristus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-31-06 10:32 PM
Response to Reply #17
50. O'Reilly is such a fucking idiot.
In Malmedy, the SS soldiers massacred our soldiers, not the other way around. No civilians were involved; in this particular incident.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Texas_Kat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-31-06 01:28 PM
Response to Reply #11
15. I think Clark likes to let BO look like a fool
Edited on Wed May-31-06 02:03 PM by Texas_Kat
to those who know better (WWII veterans are particularly knowledgeable).

He also refuses to play BO's game and get sidetracked into a discussion of Billy's Boy's misunderstanding of history. That kind of side issue would waste the time better spent by Clark making his point.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dhalgren Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-31-06 01:34 PM
Response to Reply #11
19. Thank you!
Wes must have been caught up in the moment to have missed that. The Germans murdered US POWs, not the other way around. O'Reilly is not just a piece of shit, he is one goddamn stupid piece of shit...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bake Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-31-06 02:16 PM
Response to Reply #19
30. No, Falafel Boy was talking about the troops on HIS side
That would have been the Germans. O'Reilly's a Nazi.

Bake
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Texas_Kat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-31-06 02:29 PM
Response to Reply #30
31. Good point!
eom
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
glitch Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-01-06 09:16 AM
Response to Reply #30
51. Indeedy. O'Reilly lets whose side he's really on slip out occasionally.
They all do it sometimes. Probably an effect of the mad cow disease.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PublicWrath Donating Member (597 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-31-06 04:14 PM
Response to Reply #11
39. We were talking about this last night. It's the second time he's said it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Johonny Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-31-06 01:21 PM
Response to Original message
10. I don't think
Murtha should go on O'Reilly's show. What would be the point? Bill clearly has no interest in the truth and no real interest in Iraqi soldiers or civilians. Let Murtha go on Keith or the Daily show. Dems should let Bill spend his time booking War Christmas nuts.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Deacon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-31-06 01:27 PM
Response to Reply #10
13. And more to the point...
...is the Bilious One comparing our soldiers to Nazi fanatics?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gatorboy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-31-06 02:10 PM
Response to Reply #13
29. That's interesting....
I remember not too long that he chastised others (was is Biden?) for doing the same thing....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Adelante Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-31-06 02:34 PM
Response to Reply #10
34. I don't agree
Those audiences you suggest are already informed and constantly updated. The rest of America needs to hear from Murtha and other Democratic leaders.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LSK Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-31-06 01:25 PM
Response to Original message
12. Franken just played some of it
And begged to be on O'Leilly's show.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Adelante Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-31-06 01:28 PM
Response to Reply #12
16. Haha
That's great :D
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ksec Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-31-06 01:33 PM
Response to Original message
18. Wes beats Oreally because he bothered to educate himself
Oreally uses freeper talking points, like the one about WW2 soldiers murdering innocent women and children. Wes called him on it and said he wants to see the proof. Of course Oreally doesnt have that history book proof, but he relies on garbage put out by the Reicht wing echo chamber.

Wes kicks these Fox news whackos everytime they debate about these things. Education can do that for ya.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bpj1962 Donating Member (123 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-31-06 01:52 PM
Response to Original message
21. Malmedy and Iwo Jima
Once again the brilliant Bill O'Reilly has his facts completely wrong and I am surprised that Wes Clark did not correct him immediately. At Malmedy which occurred during the Battle of the Bulge captured American soldiers were loaded up in trucks to be taken to a collection point. The trucks stopped in field and the soldiers where told to get out and then they were machine gunned down by SS soldiers. Many of them where then shot in the head if they moved. German soldiers were dressing as American MP and their mission was to disrupt traffic flow and cut lines of communication. As for Iwo Jima the Japanese fought to the death. They were savage in their treatment of captured marines and in many cases they mutilated the marines and then murdered them, The Japanese were borrowed into the island and in many cases the only way to get them out of the bunkers was to us a flame thrower. For a good read on the battle of Iwo Jima read "Flag of my Father", it is a very vivid description of what the Marines faced on Iwo. Also at both Malmedy and Iwo Jima there where very few civilians to deal with.

I am so tired of these idiots who spew this junk as fact and then deny they said it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tracer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-31-06 02:09 PM
Response to Reply #21
28. Thank you, BPJ ...
... I was just about to post the same thing re: Malmedy & Iwo Jima.

Billo is just about the stupidest blowhard on TV.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ItsTheMediaStupid Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-31-06 02:37 PM
Response to Reply #21
35. Clark didn't bother correcting him b/c he was busy telling the truth
BO'R was trying to get him off track with this phony history crap.

WWII was a completely different situation. An American soldier fighting German soldiers France didn't have any problems figuring out who the enemy was. The Germans didn't kill three or four of his platoon and then run away to hide in the general population.

WWII had a clearly defined front line where most of the action took place. Sometimes our guys got behind the German front lines and vice versa, but that was commando action, not the constant guerilla activities our guys in Iraq face. They never know what to expect, no place outside the Green Zone is safe. After a while, some of the troops break down and commit atrocities.

It happened in Vietnam and it's now happening in Iraq. I'm not trying to defend the men doing this, just trying to show the role that the constant stress of their situation has on them.

We're going to have another generation of young men and women dealing with post traumatic stress disorder because of this occupation and the insurgency.:(
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hubert Flottz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-31-06 02:40 PM
Response to Reply #21
36. I saw that too...
Edited on Wed May-31-06 02:43 PM by Hubert Flottz
The Malmedy massacre was Waffen SS troops under the command of SS-Obergruppenführer Sepp Dietrich and SS-Colonel Joachim Peiper, shooting unarmed American prisoners. They were both tried and convicted of war crimes along with their men.

snip

43 sentenced to death by hanging
22 sentenced to life imprisonment
2 sentenced to 20 years imprisonment
1 sentenced to 15 years imprisonment
5 sentenced to 10 years imprisonment

The sentences were commuted at the behest of a U.S. Senate armed services subcommittee led by Senator Robert Taft. In no case was a death penalty carried out.

http://www.answers.com/main/ntquery?dsid=2222&dekey=Malm%C3%A9dy+massacre+trial&linktext=Malm%C3%A9dy%20massacre%20trial

Our soldiers had to burn the enemy out of caves on Iwo Jima because the Japanese soldiers refused to give up and chose to die rather than surrender. I know of nothing like what Billy O' speaks of, ever taking place on Iwo Jima...I think Billy read too many "Howling Commando" comic books, or other works of fiction like the shit on FOX TV...

I do know that throughout the war the Japanese murdered prisoners on a regular basis.

Bill is helping Bush Rewrite history.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PublicWrath Donating Member (597 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-31-06 04:37 PM
Response to Reply #36
43. Doesn't o'really have a radio show, too? Somebody should call in and
very carefully draw him out on what he thinks happened at Malmedy. Then he wouldn't be able to claim he meant something else. My, wouldn't Keith O like to have something like that!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AlCzervik Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-31-06 01:56 PM
Response to Original message
22. Murtha owes O'Leilly jack shit and thats that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wicket Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-31-06 01:56 PM
Response to Original message
23. God Bless Wesley Clark
n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
stepnw1f Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-31-06 01:58 PM
Response to Original message
24. He Would Make a Great Secretary of Defense
God, I am tired today... please help carry us further. All we want is peace.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jazzjunkysue Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-31-06 10:16 PM
Response to Reply #24
49. I'll second that. Edwards could hire him.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
katty Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-31-06 02:00 PM
Response to Original message
25. sorry ass O'Smiley's ratings lately?he should team w/Geraldo
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blogslut Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-31-06 02:01 PM
Response to Original message
26. Heheh
Old Billy couldn't back out of that bit fast enough...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
warrens Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-31-06 02:01 PM
Response to Original message
27. Olbermann should get every clip of O'Reilly attacking Murtha
And when the final report comes out, and it's going to be baaaaaad, play clips from Falafelboy and then clips from the witnesses describing what happened. Fair and balanced. Murtha or Falfelboy. You decide.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Disturbed Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-31-06 02:30 PM
Response to Reply #27
32. Wesley Clark cannot become Sec of Defense.
A person must be 10 years out of the Military in 0rder to have that job. Maybe he could become Sec of State?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hubert Flottz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-31-06 02:47 PM
Response to Reply #27
37. It would make a good worst person of the week story...
Edited on Wed May-31-06 03:30 PM by Hubert Flottz
Bill Rewrites History to Cover Bush's Ass.

Billy O' is the Neocon's own little "Howling Commando" telling lies on the FRONT LINES, to serve and protect the GOP. Another GOPer who wishes he could make up for not having the nads to fight for his country in Nam.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
young_at_heart Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-31-06 02:34 PM
Response to Original message
33. Wes Clark has what it takes
He was our first choice in 2004.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
renate Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-31-06 03:41 PM
Response to Original message
38. that was a treat!
I'd worried about watching the interview because I've heard so often that O'Reilly steamrolls over people he disagrees with by just yelling louder and louder until they simply can't be heard.

Maybe General Clark just has a calming effect even on wingnuts like the Big Giant Head.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Adelante Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-31-06 04:29 PM
Response to Reply #38
42. You know what I was wondering about?
We've all noticed that Wes hadn't been on O'Reilly or Hannity for some time and thought they said they didn't want him on their shows. I'm wondering now if Wes said he wouldn't go on their shows if he was going to be subject to rudeness. I wouldn't put it past him.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SnowGoose Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-31-06 04:26 PM
Response to Original message
41. It's slander! I wish someone could get the Vets to call in en mass.
And give Billy-boy a thorough tongue-lashing. Bad things might indeed happen during war, but Bill O'Reilly is slandering our troops, accusing them of an atrocity actually perpetrated by the Nazis.

You just think what would have happened if a Democrat had said this.

Why, oh why, does he hate America and our troops so much!?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Barad Simith Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-31-06 05:27 PM
Response to Original message
44. O'Reilly can't "take" Clark, never has been able to
That's one reason I could really get excited about Clark as a Presidential candidate. He can devour an O'Reilly type, and still want desert.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sakabatou Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-31-06 05:42 PM
Response to Original message
45. Blubbering Bill "Falafel-boy" O'Leilly
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FrenchieCat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-31-06 09:22 PM
Response to Original message
46. Gen. Clark....just doing "duty"....
Somebody's got to do it! :headbang:

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Adelante Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-31-06 10:05 PM
Response to Reply #46
47. That's still my favorite
Smackdown.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
upi402 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-31-06 10:11 PM
Response to Original message
48. I was a Clark delegate
and I'd be an anti-delegate for O'Liarly anyday.
:puke:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sat Apr 20th 2024, 09:42 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC