In 1984, Walter Mondale was in an uphill fight and went for a "Hail Mary" pass (well, technically a Hail Geraldine) by nominating the first female vice presidential candidate from a major party. How many of us thought we'd go a whole quarter of century with neither party trying it again? Republicans, who've suffered from a gender gap problem, probably have the most to gain from nominating a woman, so I'm kinda surprised they haven't. But it's not like we have any dearth of XX talent (as opposed to XY talent, so get your mind out of the gutter, Matcom). Look at the line up of women contenders we could be choosing among...
. . Kathleen Sebelius
. . . . . . Maria Cantwell
. . . . . . . . Patty Murray
. . . Janet Napolitano
. . . . . . Shirley Franklin
. . . . . . and probably some people I haven't even thought of.
I think it's a shame that we're wasting so much of our political talent in this country. We'll scrape the bottom of the barrel to hire any old assclown to be president, but the only woman our party is seriously considering right now is there in large part because she happened to be married to a former president. (I mean no disrespect to Senator Clinton, but a first termer with only a moderate amount of leadership success isn't going to get "
mentioned" unless some candidates just get free passes (or the opposition desperately wants to run against her).
I don't go in much for tokenism when it comes to candidates; leaders should stand and fall on their own talents. But certainly there's enough silence, enough "dogs that didn't bark," among these non-candidates to wonder why none of them are getting any serious buzz. What are we doing wrong?
PS, the best kept political secret of this decade: Sebelius has green hair.
http://6news.ljworld.com/art/apps/pennynews/1080978356_Sebelius,-Kathleen-602.jpg