Is Iran next on Bush's list

[INdemo]

Lets face it his poll numbers are down (except for doctored polls) and he is just dumb enough to invade Iran.
Heaven help us..

[texastoast]

1. Yup

That was my prediction two years ago, but I think I thought it would be Syria first then Iran. Gotta check the planets.;-)

[DemGirl7]

2. Ummm...Yes

I can't hardly wait for the nuclear winter that will follow :sarcasm:
We are truly screwed this time :banghead:

[0007]

3. Sure starting to look that way. Can congress can stop him

this time?

[Captain Hilts]

4. If the Iraq War had gone well, yes. But it hasn't, so no. nt

[robbedvoter]

5. Makes sense - alphabetically speaking...

[hippiechick]

6. Did you hear his speech today ?

:scared:

And, in an amazing coincidence, the new German PM (Merkel) just happens to be sympathetic to the US goals in 'the war on terra', unlike Schroeder - who she defeated by the slimmest and most suspicious of margins (Dimson even cracked a joke about it)...

The shit he was spewing today about Iran could easily have been a speech from 2001, with the word 'Afghanistan' crossed out to read 'Iraq' for 2003, then 'Iraq' crossed out and replaced with 'Iran' this morning. I swear. Same 'they are defying the UN inspectors', 'they'll have a nookyaler weapon within 5 years' CRAPOLA he's fed the sheeple hundred times before.

Just watch, as the pre-war pre-game hysteria vs. Iran ramps up, we'll hear less and less about Iraq, and Afghanistan will practially fall off the map.

Georgie likes to start shit, but he sure as hell can't ever finish a job. His resume is proof of that.


:puke:

[INdemo]

7. Yes,

I just saw a few seconds of his speech.Long enough to hear him make that "Iran you're next" type statement

[OPERATIONMINDCRIME]

8. Seems Fairly Obvious. Not Sure How Someone Could Claim Otherwise.