Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Why is Lindsey Graham so worried about Jack Abramoff?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
 
DoYouEverWonder Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-13-06 09:29 PM
Original message
Why is Lindsey Graham so worried about Jack Abramoff?
Twice in two days, right in the middle of the Alito Confirmation hearings, Lindsey Graham blurted out odd, if not inappropriate comments regarded Jack Abramoff. Seems that Graham is more then just a little worried about having to defend himself down the road and was sending a clear message to Alito and the rest of their base, that if Alito gets appointed to the SC, the fix is in.


Here's the first one:

GRAHAM: I guess there's no rule against beating a dead horse, or we'd all have quit a long time ago.

(LAUGHTER)

So in the next 30 minutes, I'm going to ask you the same questions you've been asked for a whole day.

(LAUGHTER)

And I hope you'll understand if any us come before a court and we can't remember Abramoff, you will tend to believe us.

(LAUGHTER)

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2006/01/10/AR2006011001418.html


The second outburst occurred, believe it or not, during Mrs. Alito's staged crying jag. Graham started off pushing the bigot button but once the cameras went to Mrs. Alito, then he suddenly started talking about campaign donations, tainted money and photos with people you wish had never been taken. Graham said nothing about bigotry or how badly Alito had been treated, even thought that is what the media is telling us he said. While everyone was distracted, Graham sent a direct message to Alito about how Alito should treat him and his colleagues when these questions come up in court.

This is what this nomination is all about. Getting Alito on the court so that all of the indictments and investigations are guaranteed to go nowhere.


ALITO: I'm not any kind of a bigot, I'm not.

GRAHAM: No, sir, you're not. And you know why I believe that? Not because you just said it -- but that's a good enough reason, because you seem to be a decent, honorable man. I have got reams of quotes from people who have worked with you, African American judges -- I've lost my quotes.

Judge Higginbotham -- I don't know where they're at. But glowing quotes about who you are, the way you've lived your life; law clerks, men and women, black and white, your colleagues who say that Sam Alito, whether I agree with him or not, is a really good man.

You know why I believe you when you say that you disavow those quotes? Because the way you have lived your life and the way you and your wife are raising your children.

Let me tell you this: Guilt by association is going to drive good men and women away from wanting to sit where you're sitting. And we're going to go through a bit of this ourselves as congressmen and senators.

People are going to take a fact that we got a campaign donation from somebody who's found out to be a little different than we thought they were -- and our political opponent's going to say, "Aha, I got you!"

And we're going to say, "Wait a minute. I didn't know that. I didn't take the money for that reason."

And you know what? I'm going to believe these senators and congressmen for the most part, because that's the way we do our business. We meet people here every day. We have photos taken with people -- and sometimes you wish you didn't have your photo taken.

But that doesn't mean that you're a bad person because of that association.


Judge Alito, I am sorry that you've had to go through this. I am sorry that your family has had to sit here and listen to this.

Now let's talk about another time not so long ago -- and another judge and some of her writings -- and see if the Senate is changing for the better or for the worse.

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2006/01/11/AR2006011101674.html?sub=AR





Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
woodsprite Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-13-06 09:42 PM
Response to Original message
1. I caught that and I thought at the time that Graham's guilty
as sin and trying to grease his way, and the other congressmen too. Hmmmm. Wonder if any of those pics they scrubbed had Graham in them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
acmejack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-13-06 09:48 PM
Response to Original message
2. Oh, How I hope the sanctimonious little twerp is guilty of something!
He sure is acting like it! He really pissed me off with his little stunt with habeas corpus in the defense budget authorization.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tularetom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-13-06 09:54 PM
Response to Original message
3. Abramoff has a picture of Lindsey
with Jeff Gannon.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
vickie Donating Member (663 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-13-06 10:38 PM
Response to Original message
4. This is truly bizarre and appears to be an effort by smarmy Mr.
Graham (sanctimonious little gerbil) to prepare the nation from the GOP sludge that is about to be dumped out by Jack -- now that he's singing....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Backlash Cometh Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-14-06 06:43 AM
Response to Original message
5. "Guilt by association" is one tool the Republicans used to bring down
the Dems. "First, they went after the Liberals..." that kind of thing.

Well, at least we know that Lindsey is on the list, eh?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mtnester Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-14-06 06:50 AM
Response to Original message
6. The ixfay is inay...inkway inkway odnay odnay
Edited on Sat Jan-14-06 06:50 AM by mtnester
sheesh..how obvious could he have been? He may as well as come right out and said "you are going to get the court to agree not to hear any of this Abramoff stuff, right? And to step in when not even asked and overturn any convictions too...right?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 19th 2024, 03:29 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC