dogfacedboy
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Jan-14-06 03:55 PM
Original message |
After BushCheneyCorp has Israel start WWIII for them, |
|
by attacking Iran, I believe that there will be an even wider split dividing Americans. The blind supporters of BushCheneyCorp will amp up their retarded rhetoric on patriotism, and the resulting military draft is going to cause the rift that already exists between the 2 Americas to widen. It's gonna get real nasty. FOXnewsfordummies is going to have a field day.
One can't blame Israel for defending themselves. Iran has made it clear they would like Israel to disappear. Iran is also a much bigger threat to world security than most nations. They hate the West, and they have a real military. Not to mention that they probably already have nuclear weapons, regardless of any oversight up until now. BushCheneyCorp, however, just wants to 'play army', and blow the shit out of something, so they can get into the history books, and act like they're 'real men'. They will jump at any chance to do so.
|
HysteryDiagnosis
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Jan-14-06 03:58 PM
Response to Original message |
1. We're fighting them over there so their survivors will |
|
Edited on Sat Jan-14-06 03:58 PM by 4MoronicYears
want to come over here and kick our collective asses.
|
firefox
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Jan-14-06 04:04 PM
Response to Original message |
2. Nobody is saying Iran has nuclear weapons nt |
Tom Joad
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Jan-14-06 04:51 PM
Response to Reply #2 |
3. Exactly. Israel has nuclear weapons though. |
dogfacedboy
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Jan-15-06 12:35 PM
Response to Reply #2 |
5. I was merely suggesting that Iran could already have nukes. |
|
This was simply a guess on my part.
|
orwell
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Jan-14-06 04:57 PM
Response to Original message |
|
...is far more dangerous than Iran, by any measurement.
It's not even close.
|
dogfacedboy
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Jan-15-06 12:44 PM
Response to Reply #4 |
6. In that region, however, Iran is very dangerous. |
|
My concern is that BushCheneyCorp is going to push and shove without using sensible diplomacy. We already know he wants war with Iran. Remember all that 'Axis of Evil' bullshit? Since Israel is a probable target in Iran's sights, all BushCheneyCorp has to do is get Israel to throw the first punch. Israel will probably be happy to do so. Then BushCheneyCorp gets to run in and 'help' it's ally, Israel. In this scenario, BushCheneyCorp gets it's war without actually 'starting it'.
|
orwell
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Jan-15-06 01:32 PM
Response to Reply #6 |
|
...Iran is bluster. If Israel attacks first, which they likely will, Iran will be forced to retaliate.
Iran will not attack first. They have no need to. They are sitting on a large pile of oil and gas that the rest of the world needs desperately, including Israel. They are about to take out the US dollar with their new Euro-based oil bourse. (That by the way is the real threat.)
I know your scenario is one that the NeoCons salivate over (America to the rescue.) What I object to is the notion that Israel needs to defend itself. It has not been attacked. Any attack by Israel at this point is offensive, not defensive.
And yes, I believe that the President of Iran is a fundie nutjob, not unlike our own President. But he has no power. The clerics do. I also suspect that he was "installed" by intel "fixers" precisely so this scenario could evolve.
It is Saddam II.
|
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Fri Apr 26th 2024, 04:34 PM
Response to Original message |