Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Tide of Sentiment Shifts in Water War: Agricultural Interests Challenged

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
 
DeepModem Mom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-14-06 10:10 PM
Original message
Tide of Sentiment Shifts in Water War: Agricultural Interests Challenged
WP: Tide of Sentiment Shifts in Water War
Traditional Favoritism to Agricultural Interests Is Challenged as Demand Increases
By Juliet Eilperin
Washington Post Staff Writer
Sunday, January 15, 2006; Page A03

....From Montana to Arizona to California and beyond, alliances of environmentalists, fishermen and city dwellers are challenging the West's traditional water barons -- farmers and ranchers -- who have long controlled the increasingly scarce resource.

The West largely depends on its rivers and snowmelt for its water supply, and a combination of recent urban growth and prolonged drought has resulted in demand greatly outstripping supply. Under longstanding federal and state policies reinforced by farmers' historic political clout, agriculture has laid claim to about 80 percent of those scant resources -- at rock-bottom prices -- on the grounds that water is critical to the survival of crops and livestock.

Now, however, other users are arguing that this system is unfair, uneconomical and a threat to many delicate ecosystems, and not only in the West.

Farmers typically pay less for their water than nearby cities: In California's Central Valley, they get their water from the federal government at below-market prices, a subsidy that amounts to $416 million a year, according to the Environmental Working Group, an advocacy organization. And unlike cities getting the same water, farmers are paying back the cost of the region's giant irrigation system without interest....

***

Such battles have spread nationwide as groups from Florida to Nebraska squabble over farmers' voracious water use, but nowhere are the stakes higher than in the fast-growing West. Rivers and streams there occupy just 5 percent of the land but sustain nearly half of the fish and wildlife species....

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2006/01/14/AR2006011400820.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
dusmcj Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-14-06 10:58 PM
Response to Original message
1. now if only it would spread to south america
where chickenshit white assholes from El Norte make the poor folks pay the corporation for access to water. I think these folks would charge for eating their own shit in front of an audience, what do you think ?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
aquart Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-14-06 11:02 PM
Response to Original message
2. The Romans built aqueducts. Why can't we?
Our nation has areas that receive too much rain in some years, and others that receive too little. What would be bad (serious question) about a national interstate system of aqueducts which could be channeled to whichever area was in need, pulling it away from areas with too much?

Are we engineering challenged? Are we less capable than the Romans of building a national system? Water is becoming a huge issue. Why are we wringing our hands instead of remembering we are one nation and taking care of it?

Just at a glance, how many jobs would such a system create?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
fed-up Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-14-06 11:22 PM
Response to Original message
3. some farmers waste a ton of water by watering midday or w/sprinklers n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kali Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-14-06 11:24 PM
Response to Original message
4. Um, what do farmers do?
That "voracious water use" IS producing something besides careers for environmentalists and lawyers.


Is the answer to outsource food production?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 04:53 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC