Peter Frank
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Jan-15-06 07:10 AM
Original message |
Freepers Don't Get that the "Reverend" Moon is the enemy... |
|
Edited on Sun Jan-15-06 07:12 AM by Peter Frank
|
slor
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Jan-15-06 07:22 AM
Response to Original message |
1. They do not "get" a... |
|
great many things. To put it simply, they are idiots.
|
Archae
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Jan-15-06 07:39 AM
Response to Original message |
2. Actually, most of them "get it" when it comes to Moon. |
|
Only a couple pro-Moon comments were there, and this first remark was simply a slam at the Congressional Black Caucus.
"Watch yourself here. Lord Moon's coronation was fully supported by the totally segregated, step-n-fetchit, colored ony Congressional Black Caucus. One of it's senior members put on white gloves (available from every dem Klan member in Congress) and carried Moon's sacred crown on a little pillow, but at a respectful distance behind Moon, Blessed Be His Name. This is a classic case of the ultra-left wing media protecting dems and, especially, black dems but refusing to report/cover an event that, had it involved a Republican, would have been on the front page of the NYT like it was the Spanish Civil War."
"The Rev gave us the Wash Times, for which he deserves a lot of credit."
I did get a chuckle from the guys (who were either :smoke: or :beer: ) that were having a little fun saying it was Keith Moon. :-)
|
Poppyseedman
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Jan-15-06 09:25 AM
Response to Original message |
3. I read the thread. Didn't see many pro Moon comments |
|
Read several that were concerned about the Rev. Moon control of the Wash. Times
So I don't understand what they don't get, at least in this instance.
|
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Fri Apr 26th 2024, 04:06 AM
Response to Original message |