Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

'Bush I's failure to get Saddam in the Gulf War cost him re-election'

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
 
bobbieinok Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-15-06 09:43 PM
Original message
'Bush I's failure to get Saddam in the Gulf War cost him re-election'
so said one of my brothers Saturday.

He said many of his friends were disgusted that Bush didn't 'take out Saddam' and refused to vote for him. They all 'knew we'd have to finish the job later.' When I said many claim that Bush's 'read my lips - no new taxes' cost him re-election, I was told 'no, it was the failure to finish Saddam.'

I said I had opposed the war. 'So we should have just let him take Kuwait and then attack Saudi Arabia?'

I said Bush told Saddam we wouldn't object if he went into Kuwait. Response 1: 'Yeah, I read that story too.' Response 2: 'We suckered him in, baited a trap and caught him.'

In the same 'lecture,' he said we should have let Saddam take Kuwait and then attack Saudi Arabia. Then US would have 'ridden to the rescue and would now control the MidEast. (There's clearly no need for consistency in this world view.)

Also, we're 'clearly going to have to go after Iran; but US won't need to do it b/c Israel will take out their nuclear capability.'

(sigh)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Fenris Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-15-06 09:49 PM
Response to Original message
1. Actually Gulf War I was Bush's biggest advantage in 1992
The war was mercifully short, was not hideously costly in terms of casualties, and had ended exactly within the confines of the original plan (ie stopping once Saddam cried uncle and Kuwait was once again sovereign). Bush rode a wave of positivism and approval following the war. What brought him down was a) his failure to understand the economic situation in the country and bring a swift end to the recession and b) a rift among the conservatives over direction (including bitterness due to the tax hike).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
fed-up Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-15-06 10:53 PM
Response to Reply #1
6. I don't think 11K dead 320,000+GWI vets on disability=not hideously costly
When will people quit repeating the LIE that there were a low number of US casualties??

The 11K is number of returned GWI vets that have died (note-it may be around 10K, but I am tired right now and con't remember)

The dollar amount spent on care for these vets is huge.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FlemingsGhost Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-15-06 10:04 PM
Response to Original message
2. Nonsense. Domestic issues ended Poppy's tenure
Edited on Sun Jan-15-06 10:05 PM by FlemingsGhost
The country was mired in recession. Bush was sucessfully portrayed as hopelessly out of touch with the general public ... and he was. (Remember his amazement regarding barcode scanners at the grocery store?) Oh, yeah ... a tax hike, after his famous "read my lips" sound bite didn't help matters

Your brother is talking out of his ass. He likely has a hard-on for "kickin' ass," and arrogantly paints his picture of the world with it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SPKrazy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-15-06 10:11 PM
Response to Original message
3. Taxes did poppy in n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SPKrazy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-15-06 10:13 PM
Response to Original message
4. As I recall Iraq Victory didn't include the will to go after Saddam
The country and it's many allies at that time weren't behind going after Saddam

Even Cheney as I recall was against it.

Predictions of the disaster it is today were prevalent then
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
brainshrub Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-15-06 10:16 PM
Response to Original message
5. As I recall, it was domestic policy and Ros Perot.
And back then, they didn't have BBV.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 16th 2024, 02:50 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC