Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

New medical study bolsters LINK BETWEEN PARKINSON'S DISEASE & PESTICIDES:

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
 
Nothing Without Hope Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-27-06 12:46 PM
Original message
New medical study bolsters LINK BETWEEN PARKINSON'S DISEASE & PESTICIDES:
People planning to use chemical pesticides in their garden may want to consider this. It's not going to hurt the popularity of organically grown fruits and vegetables, either.

http://www.sciam.com/article.cfm?chanID=sa003&articleID=000BE289-5BAD-149D-9BAD83414B7F0000

Study Bolsters Link between Pesticides and Parkinson's


June 26, 2006
by Karen Schrock

People who have been exposed to pesticides are 70 percent more likely to develop Parkinson's disease than those who haven't, according to a new study. The results suggest that any pesticide exposure, whether occupationally related or not, will increase a person's risk of the disease. This means that using pesticides in the home or garden may have similarly harmful effects as working with the chemicals on a farm or as a pest controller.

The research, published in the July issue of Annals of Neurology, provides the strongest evidence to date of the link between pesticide exposure and Parkinson's. The study included over 143,000 men and women who completed extensive lifestyle questionnaires beginning in 1982, and follow-up surveys through 2001. All subjects were symptom-free at the beginning of the project, when they were asked about their occupation and exposure to potentially hazardous materials. Since then, 413 of them have developed confirmed cases of Parkinson's, with a greater incidence of the disease in those who spent time around pesticides. "Low- dose pesticide exposure was associated with a significant increase in risk for Parkinson's disease," says lead author Alberto Ascherio of the Harvard School for Public Health. "I think this is one reason to be careful about using pesticides in general."

Although the causes of Parkinson's are not well understood, it has long been suspected that environmental factors play a large role. Animal studies have shown that chemical compounds commonly used as pesticides can cause a degeneration of dopamine-producing neurons. In Parkinson's, a shortage of dopamine causes the disease's characteristic motor abnormalities, including muscle tremors and muscle rigidity. Previous small-scale human studies had suggested a link between pesticides and Parkinson's, but this new study is the first to establish a clear correlation in a large patient population.

The researchers also looked for links between Parkinson's and other environmental contaminants, including asbestos, coal dust, exhaust, formaldehyde and radioactive material. They found no correlation between the disease and any of the materials besides pesticides, however. Because of the design of the questionnaires, the study was not able to determine how the frequency, duration, or intensity of pesticide exposure affected the incidence of Parkinson's. The next step, according to Ascherio, is to figure out which class of chemicals is actually causing the disease, so that people can reduce their exposure.


Here is the article abstract and author list from the Annals of Neurology site:

http://www3.interscience.wiley.com/cgi-bin/abstract/112660877/ABSTRACT
Annals of Neurology
Early View (Articles online in advance of print)
Published Online: 26 Jun 2006
Copyright © 2006 American Neurological Association

Pesticide exposure and risk for Parkinson's disease


Alberto Ascherio, MD, DrPH 1 2 *, Honglei Chen, MD, PhD 3, Marc G. Weisskopf, PhD 1, Eilis O'Reilly, MSc 1, Marjorie L. McCullough, ScD 4, Eugenia E. Calle, PhD 4, Michael A. Schwarzschild, MD, PhD 5, Michael J. Thun, MD 4
1Department of Nutrition, Harvard School of Public Health, Boston, MA
2Department of Epidemiology, Harvard School of Public Health, Boston, MA
3Epidemiology Branch, National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences, Research Triangle Park, NC
4Epidemiology and Surveillance Research Department, American Cancer Society, Atlanta, GA
5Department of Neurology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA
email: Alberto Ascherio (aascheri@hsph.harvard.edu)
*Correspondence to Alberto Ascherio, Department of Nutrition, Harvard School of Public Health, 665 Huntington Avenue, Boston, MA 02115

Funded by:
Michael J. Fox Foundation
Kinetic Foundation
National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences; Grant Number: ES10804

Abstract:

Objective
Chronic, low-dose exposure to pesticides is suspected to increase the risk for Parkinson's disease (PD), but data are inconclusive.

Methods
We prospectively examined whether individuals exposed to pesticides have higher risk for PD than those not exposed. The study population comprised participants in the Cancer Prevention Study II Nutrition Cohort, a longitudinal investigation of US men and women initiated in 1992 by the American Cancer Society. Follow-up surveys were conducted in 1997, 1999, and 2001. The 143,325 individuals who returned the 2001 survey and did not have a diagnosis or symptoms of PD at baseline (1992) were included in the analyses.

Results
Exposure to pesticides was reported by 7,864 participants (5.7%), including 1,956 farmers, ranchers, or fishermen. Individuals exposed to pesticides had a 70% higher incidence of PD than those not exposed (adjusted relative risk, 1.7; 95% confidence interval, 1.2-2.3; p = 0.002). The relative risk for pesticide exposure was similar in farmers and nonfarmers. No relation was found between risk for PD and exposure to asbestos, chemical/acids/solvents, coal or stone dust, or eight other occupational exposures.

Interpretation
These data support the hypothesis that exposure to pesticides may increase risk for PD. Future studies should seek to identify the specific chemicals responsible for this association. Ann Neurol 2006

Received: 25 January 2006; Accepted: 28 April 2006
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
The Straight Story Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-27-06 12:49 PM
Response to Original message
1. Thanks for the info and a KICK.
Sending it off to the wife to read.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Nothing Without Hope Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-27-06 01:01 PM
Response to Original message
2. self-kick for visibility n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Nothing Without Hope Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-27-06 01:21 PM
Response to Original message
3. and another. This is a significant finding. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Nothing Without Hope Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-27-06 02:15 PM
Response to Original message
4. kick. Too bad this is being ignored. It affects a lot of people. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
benddem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-27-06 02:29 PM
Response to Original message
5. my brother and his friends
used to ride their bikes behind the mosquito spraying trucks...oh lord. In Vietnam besides Agent Orange they had some powerful bug spray they used ALL the time. The smell made me ill. Now it really may make me ill.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Time for change Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-27-06 03:41 PM
Response to Original message
6. Very interesting - thank you
I'm surprised that only a 0.3% of the whole sample developed Parkinson's Disease - I thought it was more common than that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Nothing Without Hope Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-27-06 05:27 PM
Response to Reply #6
8. Yes, that low number is a bit reassuring, unless there are long-term
effects that may arise still later. I hope not.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Time for change Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-28-06 07:32 AM
Response to Reply #8
11. I guess that's about right
This article shows an incidence of about 0.02 per 100 years.
http://www.jr2.ox.ac.uk/bandolier/booth/neurol/incpd.html

Your article showed a sligtly higher incidence over only an 18 year period, but I would expect a higher incidence than in the general population since the population in that article was considerably older than the general population.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Nothing Without Hope Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-27-06 09:47 PM
Response to Reply #6
9. It's also true, as the group pointed out, that "pesticides" is a very
broad identification, and that it will be important to narrow this and identify which compounds are having the effect. It's possible that the true incidence is higher than the 0.3% with the compounds that are responsible for the action. Much more work is needed, but for now, this finding strengthens my resolve to go for food that has been grown with care and without pesticides.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Catherine Vincent Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-27-06 03:49 PM
Response to Original message
7. That's good to know.
Thanks.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lochloosa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-27-06 09:50 PM
Response to Original message
10. K/R and bookmarked to add to the argument with my wife.....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Nothing Without Hope Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-28-06 11:39 AM
Response to Original message
12. another kick n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 30th 2024, 06:31 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC