Gore/Murtha?

[helderheid]

I think that would be a fine pair.

[Proud2BAmurkin]

1. No. Gore/Clinton

nt

[GrpCaptMandrake]

4. By God, that might just work!

It would give Hillary a shot down the road and let Gore, who has long been ready to be President, take his rightful place.

[helderheid]

7. I think it's the most pragmatic choice.

:thumbsup:

[serryjw]

13. They hate each other

Gore/Clark would be great

[dchill]

6. Gore/ -Bill- Clinton?

Sure, OK.

[LSK]

2. NO!

Gore/Feingold.

How quickly we forget that Murtha is a bigtime defense hawk.

[Vincardog]

3. No Gore/Boxer

[helderheid]

5. heheheh - well I guess that answers THAT! :)

[dchill]

8. Actually, Gore/Murtha is FINE by me...FWIW

[AuntiBush]

9. I'll Just Take GORE & Whomever at this point.

Honestly, my dog could do a better job of running this country!

GORE/WHOMEVER just as long as it's GORE front & center.

[dchill]

14. GORE/WHOMEVER...

But certainly not GORE/LIEBERMAN again! Let's limit participation to Democrats, please.
;)

[MindPilot]

10. I agree! Gore/Clark would work too.

I think Gore proved that a pro-war centrist go-along-to-get along Dino on the ticket didn't work last time.

[Tesla]

12. His speech made me cry HARD!!!

"It is simply an insult to those who came before us and sacrificed so much on our behalf to imply that we have more to be fearful of than they. Yet they faithfully protected our freedoms and now it is up to us to do the same." -Al Gore 1/16/06

[bunkerbuster1]

11. After hearing Gore's speech

I'd say he has a fine pair.

But as for his running mate? Murtha's fine, but why not Wes Clark?

[RUMMYisFROSTED]

15. No.

Silly.

[helderheid]

17. LOL

[Jeanette in FL]

16. Gore/Edwards

John Edwards was on the short list for Al Gore in 2000. Sure wish he would have gone with that then, but I will take it now.