Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Harwood:Lieberman Used GOP Talking Points in the Debate; Lamont Polished

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
 
CatWoman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-06-06 09:35 PM
Original message
Harwood:Lieberman Used GOP Talking Points in the Debate; Lamont Polished
John Harwood spoke much more candidly than I thought he would have tonight after the debate. He pointed out that Lieberman used Ronald Reagan’s and George Bush’s talking point strategies in his debate with Ned Lamont which is right in line with his Republican influences. He said that Lamont spoke directly to the people and came off very polished.

Harwood: He used the old Ronald Reagan line, "There you go again," to Ned Lamont and he used the strategy that George W. Bush used against John Kerry in 2004…

Noron: Is that going to work for him, adopting these Republican strategies when in many ways the heart of this debate is that Lieberman is too much like Bush…

Harwood: and you gotta say, Ned Lamont was a very polished and effective performer for somebody who lacks experience running against somebody who ran for President…

Noron: I agree with you…

I don’t think that the war is the only position that Lamont is running on, but they did frame it that way. Harwood gave a bit too much credit to the netroots because the local CT’ers have been turning out in droves to support Ned. Norah and Harwood both thought Ned did a really good job for a man who has had no experience in a debate like this one before.

http://www.crooksandliars.com/
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Cha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-06-06 09:38 PM
Response to Original message
1. joe's idol..
"he used the strategy that George W. Bush used against John Kerry in 2004…

What was that? LIE, Trash, Lie, Swiftboat, osama tape, LIE, TRASH.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CatWoman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-06-06 09:41 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. he did all of the above
Fact Checking Lieberman
By: John Amato on Thursday, July 6th, 2006 at 6:08 PM - PDT

Matt Stoller :

The most significant lies were his assertions that he stood strong against Social Security from the first day Bush proposed privatization, and that he doesn’t support an open-ended commitment in Iraq (he does in fact supports permanent military bases).

February 18, 2005:

Sen. Joseph Lieberman, D-Conn., is undecided about the concept of using payroll taxes to fund private Social Security accounts, bringing to three the known number of Senate Democrats who have yet to publicly rule out the idea. President Bush has made the accounts the centerpiece of his domestic agenda. But other than Rep. Allen Boyd of Florida, no congressional Democrats have formally signed on. While Lieberman has concerns about the idea, he is continuing to study it while hoping for more details on Social Security from the president, a Lieberman aide said today. "He’s still in a listening and learning stage and is keeping an open mind, but he does have concerns about private accounts as carve-outs that would potentially undermine the guaranteed minimum benefit and worsen our fiscal health and debt load," a Lieberman aide said today.

Lieberman, 4/20/03:

"We may, over the long term, with the consent of the new Iraqi government, establish some permanent bases in Iraq. And wouldn’t that be a dramatic change, where we have an allied government there in Iraq, at the center of the Middle East, where we may have not a permanent police presence, but one or another military base that’s working in cooperation with the government there?"

http://www.crooksandliars.com/posts/2006/07/06/fact-checking-lieberman/
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wakeme2008 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-06-06 09:40 PM
Response to Original message
2. LOL when a person from the WSJ starts making fun of you
Edited on Thu Jul-06-06 09:41 PM by wakeme2008
You history...Joe
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CatWoman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-06-06 09:41 PM
Response to Reply #2
5. all the king' s horses, and all the king's men
couldn't find joe's momentum again :D
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gumby Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-06-06 09:41 PM
Response to Original message
4. Really?
I'm surprised that Noron didn't totally trash Lamont.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CatWoman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-06-06 09:42 PM
Response to Reply #4
6. maybe after the way she trashed Cindy
she is on her best behavior tonight.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wordpix2 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-06-06 09:44 PM
Response to Original message
7. thanks, I missed the debate but it's coming up at 11 pm on WVIT-NBC in CT
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wordpix2 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-06-06 09:49 PM
Response to Original message
8. "test case" in CT for liberal base
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wordpix2 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-06-06 09:51 PM
Response to Original message
9. Ned "polished and effective "and Norah O'Donnel agrees with Harwood
Liberman is having a fit right now with these talking heads giving Lamont the nod.

:toast:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rainscents Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-06-06 09:55 PM
Response to Original message
10. Was this on C-Span? If so, I miss it.
Damn it!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CatWoman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-06-06 09:56 PM
Response to Reply #10
11. yes it was
check their page -- it will be replayed later tonight.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kahuna Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-07-06 05:29 AM
Response to Original message
12. Harwood is a "reporter." He calls is straight just about 99.9%
of the time. He's a rare one alright. He constantly amazes me.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
H2O Man Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-07-06 05:50 AM
Response to Original message
13. "Courage of my convictions..."
My teen-aged son asked why Joe didn't wear a "Courage of My Convictions" t-shirt. I said he must not have seen his buddy Scooter to get one.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Swamp Rat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-07-06 06:12 AM
Response to Reply #13
14. LOL!
Smart kid. :D

You know, I wouldn't be surprised if Lieberman all of a sudden announced, "I am joining the Republican Party!" ("HAHA!")


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
H2O Man Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-07-06 11:19 AM
Response to Reply #14
16. Yikes!
He really is a neoconservative. No more, no less.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CatWoman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-07-06 10:47 AM
Response to Reply #13
15. how could you have a teenaged son?
you're just a teenager yourself :hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
H2O Man Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-07-06 11:21 AM
Response to Reply #15
17. I keep reminding
my wife that my grandfather had his 14th child at age 70.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CatWoman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-07-06 05:17 PM
Response to Reply #17
18. oh my!!!!
:wow:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 01:06 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC