Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

John "Torture" Yoo Says - SCOTUS Hampering Bush's Power Grab (LAT Edit)

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
 
kpete Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-07-06 08:21 AM
Original message
John "Torture" Yoo Says - SCOTUS Hampering Bush's Power Grab (LAT Edit)
The high court's Hamdan power grab
The justices are hampering the president's ability to fight terrorists, says an architect of Bush's legal strategy.
By John Yoo
July 7, 2006


A PRESIDENT responds to an unprecedented war with unprecedented measures that test the limits of his constitutional authority. He suffers setbacks from hostile Supreme Court justices, a critical media and a divided Congress, all of which challenge his war powers.

Liberal pundits and editorial pages would have you believe this describes President Bush after the Supreme Court last week rejected military commissions for trying terrorists. But it just as easily fits Abraham Lincoln when he issued the Emancipation Proclamation freeing the slaves or Franklin D. Roosevelt when he made the United States the great "arsenal of democracy" in the lead-up to World War II.

The court's decision in Hamdan vs. Rumsfeld ignores the basic workings of our separation of powers and will hamper the ability of future presidents to respond to emergencies with the forcefulness and vision of a Lincoln or an FDR.

Long-standing U.S. practice recognizes that the president, as commander in chief, plays the leading role in wartime. Presidents have started wars without congressional authorization, and they have exercised complete control over military strategy and tactics. They can act with a speed, unity and secrecy that the other branches of government cannot match. By contrast, legislatures are large, diffuse and slow. Their collective design may make them better for deliberating over policy, but at the cost of delay and lack of resolve.

more at:
http://www.latimes.com/news/opinion/commentary/la-oe-yoo7jul07,0,3547342.story?coll=la-home-commentary
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
acmejack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-07-06 08:25 AM
Response to Original message
1. How dare they?
The Judical Branch actually operating as a coequal third leg of the triad of government? Egads!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hosnon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-07-06 08:29 AM
Response to Original message
2. Well of course the S. Ct. is hampering his ability to fight terrorists..it
would be much easier if the office of the President had all of the powers of government.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
checkmate1947 Donating Member (150 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-07-06 08:30 AM
Response to Original message
3. Go back to Korea!!!!
If Mr Yoo is so intent on the supreme leader may I suggest he try North Korea he would fit right in at home with Mr. Kim Jung Ill.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Toots Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-07-06 08:34 AM
Response to Original message
4. Damn activist judges..that we appointed..don't they realize Bush* is boss
:shrug: That damn constitution is always getting in our way, it is after all only a piece of paper..:shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
annabanana Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-07-06 08:36 AM
Response to Original message
5. Yoo is the worst kind of toadying piece of crap..
He really ought to be subjected to the results of his deluded philosophizing..
(badly in need of a karmic smackdown)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leftyladyfrommo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-07-06 08:38 AM
Response to Original message
6. Ive listened to him several times - he has a really odd take on
things. And yet he just seems so calm and rational that I can see where people have fallen for his arguments.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sendero Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-07-06 08:45 AM
Response to Original message
7. Churchill, Lincoln, Roosevelt....
.... they love to compare that moron in the white house to men whose boots he's not fit to lick.

I'm thinking more of Al Capone or Daffy Duck.

Bush is certain he's going to go down in history as a great president. He couldn't be more wrong.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gramsciforza Donating Member (9 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-07-06 09:31 AM
Response to Reply #7
8. yes yes yes
It helps to know the play, but here goes

"Some are born great, Some achieve greatness and some have greatness thrust upon'em" feste
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sendero Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-07-06 09:47 AM
Response to Reply #8
11. And some are great...
... only in their own minds, fostered by listening to only sycophants.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
originalpckelly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-07-06 09:34 AM
Response to Original message
9. So this man is comparing...
The freeing of slaves to treating millions of innocent Americans like criminals? (That is by the way what the call record database does.)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
msongs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-07-06 09:41 AM
Response to Original message
10. what makes this guy think ANYONE is challenging Bush criminal
and unconstitutional behavior? So the court rules ONCE against bush. big deal. the congress does nothing. the alleged opposition party does nothing of importance, using ineffective language.

the consititution says only congress can declare war.

it says the president can either implement congressional law or veto it. Nothing about acting on signing statements.

yet bush gets away with starting wars and violating the constitution. sheeesh.

Msongs
www.msongs.com/political-shirts.htm

Msongs
www.msongs.com/political-shirts.htm
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
n2doc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-07-06 09:50 AM
Response to Original message
12. More accurate to say the SCOTUS is limiting his power to fight us
As the front page on DU notes- the evidence is in favor of a GWOTUS (Global War on the US) waged by BUSHCO.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 19th 2024, 06:57 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC