Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Should the southern states have been readmitted?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
 
RB TexLa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-08-06 01:57 AM
Original message
Poll question: Should the southern states have been readmitted?


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
texasleo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-08-06 02:01 AM
Response to Original message
1. Other
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Liberal In Texas Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-08-06 02:02 AM
Response to Original message
2. It must be getting late. A really stupid poll just popped up.
Edited on Sat Jul-08-06 02:05 AM by LibInTexas
And I haven't had enough to drink to either take it seriously or treat it as a joke.

Where's an admin (like where's the cops!) when you need them. This is flame-bate region bashing.

Good night.

!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Syrinx Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-08-06 02:04 AM
Response to Original message
3. Really, what is the point of a garbage post like this?
:shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Liberal In Texas Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-08-06 02:09 AM
Response to Reply #3
5. There is no point. The OP is bored and trying to stir up some
excitement in his boring life.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RB TexLa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-08-06 02:14 AM
Response to Reply #5
6. no, It brings up interesting alternative histories

which I find enjoyable to discuss.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SensibleAmerican Donating Member (460 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-08-06 02:17 AM
Response to Reply #6
7. What would the purpose of war been had it not been to force the South back
It would have been a war in vain ...

You have to accept 1 of 2 premises:

1. The South wins
2. The North lets the South secede
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RB TexLa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-08-06 02:17 AM
Response to Reply #7
8. Being a territory of a country is not a successful secession
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SensibleAmerican Donating Member (460 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-08-06 02:19 AM
Response to Reply #8
9. True
But Lincoln or the new government would have had to change his stance on the legal right to secede.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RB TexLa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-08-06 02:21 AM
Response to Reply #9
10. I guess the question would be if a geographic area's status as a state
Edited on Sat Jul-08-06 02:21 AM by RGBolen
is guaranteed once granted





spelling on edit
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SensibleAmerican Donating Member (460 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-08-06 02:22 AM
Response to Reply #10
11. Constitutionally, yes
n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RB TexLa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-08-06 02:23 AM
Response to Reply #11
12. But no one stopped the creation of West Va

did that go to court?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SensibleAmerican Donating Member (460 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-08-06 02:26 AM
Response to Reply #12
13. Good point
I'm going to Google this and search Wikipedia.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SensibleAmerican Donating Member (460 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-08-06 02:28 AM
Response to Reply #13
14. There was a creation of a reorganized government of Virginia
This government authorized West Virginia's creation.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RB TexLa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-08-06 02:31 AM
Response to Reply #14
17. right, would still say it was shaky constitutionally
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RB TexLa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-08-06 02:30 AM
Response to Reply #13
15. I've read about it before but don't remember if it went to federal court

I know there was controversy and the issues of there not being the ability to create a state out of another and if they were going to allow it then they were accepting Virgina as not being a state.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Liberal In Texas Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-08-06 02:31 AM
Response to Reply #6
16. It might be an interesting thing to discuss in the fiction section.
Like alien abductions.

Alternative fiction has its place. I agree.

But you don't put it up like that, and you know it. You are being disingenuous.

You are trying to flame bait.

If you really want to discuss alternative fiction scenarios, go to:

http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=show_topics&forum=208

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RB TexLa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-08-06 02:33 AM
Response to Reply #16
18. It also was a factual, historical debate and decision
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SensibleAmerican Donating Member (460 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-08-06 02:36 AM
Response to Reply #16
19. It's turned into a good discussion
Leave it be ... :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Liberal In Texas Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-08-06 02:44 AM
Response to Reply #19
20. WHERE did this become a GOOD DISCUSSION???
Edited on Sat Jul-08-06 02:46 AM by LibInTexas
Bullshit. (Edited to not say INTERESTING.)

This is flame-bait and you know it.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SensibleAmerican Donating Member (460 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-08-06 03:15 AM
Response to Reply #20
27. Well then quit commenting on it if you don't like it ...
n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Liberal In Texas Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-08-06 03:57 AM
Response to Reply #27
29. I don't need you to lecture me about when to comment.
And welcome to DU. I think.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SensibleAmerican Donating Member (460 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-08-06 02:07 AM
Response to Original message
4. They didn't have the legal right to secede
Can you believe we would all have been Republicans back then?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bucky Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-08-06 02:49 AM
Response to Reply #4
23. I'd've been a Whig. Or a Know Nothing. I'd've been a GREAT Know Nothing
Of course if I was a Whig, you hard core abolitionists would have called me a WINO. And dammit, you woulda been right!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RoyGBiv Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-08-06 03:54 AM
Response to Reply #23
28. Ummm ...

The American Party (Know Nothings) was full of racist xenophobes, the 19th century equivalent of the superpatriot who wanted to rename french fries to freedom fries. Most people don't realize this, I understand, but I thought you might want to before saying you'd make a "great" one.

"I am not a Know-Nothing. That is certain. How could I be? How can any one who abhors the oppression of negroes, be in favor of degrading classes of white people? Our progress in degeneracy appears to me to be pretty rapid. As a nation, we began by declaring that "all men are created equal." We now practically read it "all men are created equal, except Negroes." When the Know-Nothings get control, it will read "all men are created equal, except Negroes and foreigners and Catholics." When it comes to this, I shall prefer emigrating to some country where they make no pretense of loving liberty - to Russia, for instance, where despotism can be taken pure and without the base alloy of hypocrisy." -- A. Lincoln


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rocinante Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-08-06 02:46 AM
Response to Original message
21. A different way to look at it...
Edited on Sat Jul-08-06 02:48 AM by Rocinante
should the United States have become a place of different countries? That would have been a hell of a mess right up to today.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Warren DeMontague Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-08-06 02:47 AM
Response to Original message
22. Not without paying the cover charge again.
No ins and outs.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bucky Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-08-06 02:53 AM
Response to Reply #22
24. But Johnson said they were still wearing their glowy green paper bracelets
Plus Virginia was with the band
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Warren DeMontague Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-08-06 03:03 AM
Response to Reply #24
25. Oh, yeah, that's what they all say.
I think Alabama stole his hand stamp off a drunk passed out in the alley.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TreasonousBastard Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-08-06 03:13 AM
Response to Original message
26. Order the popcorn, because I'm gonna say...
the only real reason for not allowing secession was that it might have given Pennsylvania, New York, and Massachussetts ideas.

So we let the Confederacy go off on its merry way, and they have to pay us for the part of the Louisiana Purchase they keep, and and make some deals over a few things like their participation in the Treaty of Guadalupe Hidalgo. We get all the good stuff, including the western territories and maybe Mexico doesn't recognize them as signatories to GH and takes Texas back. No doubt operatives in State would be making all sorts of backroom deals there.

We no longer have to send back runaway slaves, so the black migrations to the Rust Belt start earlier and we get the workers while they keep barren cotton fields.

Dunno if Mark Twain would have moved to Connecticut, though. They might have kept him.

And Midwest river traffic down through New Orleans would be a problem.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RoyGBiv Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-08-06 03:59 AM
Response to Original message
30. Moot question ...

The legal status of the so-called seceded states was that they were in rebellion, ergo were never "out" of the Union. The process by which these states became full members of the body politic is, for the sake of convenience, sometimes called "readmission," and some politicians at the time thought in those terms, but for the process actually to be akin to readmission, legally speaking, one has to grant the validity of secession itself, which would have opened up a whole new set of legal problems.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Selatius Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-08-06 04:05 AM
Response to Original message
31. When they left, Lincoln SHOULD HAVE LET THEM LEAVE
Peace was preferable to several hundred dead soldiers. Slavery was an atrocity, but an atrocity in the face of another is not the way.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lildreamer316 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-08-06 04:30 AM
Response to Original message
32. EXCUSE ME?
Edited on Sat Jul-08-06 04:31 AM by lildreamer316
WHAT the hell kinda question is that?

What
ever.

NOT another run of South-bashing on the DU.

My ancestors do include (PERSONALLY) Robert. E. Lee.

I love what America has been and could be again.

Let's DROP this, you are just distracting from the important discussions at hand.
Thanks for the divisive subject, just what we needed.:eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Heidi Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-08-06 06:51 AM
Response to Original message
33. Locking.
Per the DU Rules:
Do not post messages that grossly insensitive toward any person or group of people based on their race, gender, sexual orientation, ethnicity, religion, lack of religion, disability, physical characteristics, or region of residence.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed Apr 24th 2024, 07:22 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC