Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

New Links Between Abramoff, White House

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
 
helderheid Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-08-06 01:53 PM
Original message
New Links Between Abramoff, White House
Logs Show 6 Appointments There

By Susan Schmidt and James V. Grimaldi
Washington Post Staff Writers
Saturday, July 8, 2006; A02

Lobbyist Jack Abramoff had a half-dozen White House appointments in the early months of the Bush administration, according to logs released yesterday by the U.S. Secret Service.

The appointments included a meeting with a domestic policy aide to Vice President Cheney and a meeting in the Office of Faith-Based and Community Initiatives attended by about 40 people. The logs also reflect that Abramoff attended one or more social events, as well as a gathering of Indian tribal officials and state legislators at which President Bush appeared.

The lobbyist, once one of the most powerful Republicans on K Street, pleaded guilty earlier this year to conspiracy and fraud. He is a cooperating witness in the Justice Department's wide-ranging investigation of corruption in Congress and the executive branch.

The Secret Service released the White House visit data yesterday in response to Freedom of Information Act requests and a lawsuit filed by the government watchdog group Judicial Watch.

In May, the Secret Service released partial data showing two White House visits by Abramoff. In a letter faxed to Judicial Watch yesterday, a Justice Department lawyer said that the Secret Service had recently learned of other visits when it "unexpectedly discovered computer files" containing entry and exit logs on the visits.

MORE >>>>>>>>
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2006/07/07/AR2006070701317.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
ChairmanAgnostic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-08-06 01:55 PM
Response to Original message
1. unexpectantly discovered? you bet!
They were SURE those files had been scrubbed earlier.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MADem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-08-06 02:03 PM
Response to Original message
2. Judicial Watch, they're bastards...but this week, they're OUR bastards!!
If you think those guys will give up, think again. They will dig, and hound, and dig and hound, and they've got pals ALL over H and K Streets. If there is more to discover, they'll do it.

In one of the previously disclosed visits -- March 6, 2001 -- Abramoff met with presidential adviser Karl Rove in an unsuccessful effort to have two allies placed in Interior Department jobs. That visit appears to have been the only one with a senior official.

The new data, combined with the two visits disclosed in May, show that Abramoff had appointments to attend White House events or meetings on seven occasions -- six in 2001 and a seventh in January 2004, on Inauguration Day. The Secret Service said the data reflect appointments but "do not necessarily reflect actual visits to the White House complex."

Among those with whom Abramoff met in the spring of 2001 was Cesar Conda, then assistant to the vice president for domestic policy, and Catharine Ryun, executive assistant to the director of the faith-based office and daughter of Rep. Jim Ryun (R-Kan.).

Conda, now a lobbyist, said in an interview that he invited Abramoff to a "casual social lunch" at the White House mess. "It was so long ago I don't remember anything about it," Conda said..... :rofl: The purpose of a March 1, 2001, appointment from 4 to 6 p.m. could not be determined from the logs. An appointment on Dec. 10, 2001, appeared to have been a holiday party for 300 guests attended by the president.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
in_cog_ni_to Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-08-06 02:19 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. Remember what Larry Klayman and Judicial Watch did to Clinton?
That man sued his own MOTHER! They went after Clinton for years.:( I'm surprised they're going after this story. Klayman isn't there anymore, so that may be why they're pursuing this.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
helderheid Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-08-06 02:34 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. let the fireworks begin!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MADem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-08-06 02:42 PM
Response to Reply #3
5. Yeah, they make "conservatives" look like pinko commies!
They were bums to Clinton back then.

But hey, there are times when ya gotta love freedom of speech and expression, and open government, and all that fun stuff. This is one of them!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
helderheid Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-08-06 03:14 PM
Response to Reply #5
6. kick!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
helderheid Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-08-06 05:35 PM
Response to Original message
7. kick
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 23rd 2024, 01:52 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC