Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Hoekstra: Failing to Inform Congress of Spying Projects Might Be Illegal

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
 
CatWoman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-08-06 05:53 PM
Original message
Hoekstra: Failing to Inform Congress of Spying Projects Might Be Illegal
By: John Amato @ 2:12 PM - PDT

In a wild development, Peter Hoekstra, the Republican chairman of the House Intelligence Committee, has come out big time against Bush and his secret programs:

In a sharply worded letter to President Bush in May, an important Congressional ally charged that the administration might have violated the law by failing to inform Congress of some secret intelligence programs and risked losing Republican support on national security matters.–

"I have learned of some alleged intelligence community activities about which our committee has not been briefed," Mr. Hoesktra wrote. "If these allegations are true, they may represent a breach of responsibility by the administration, a violation of the law, and, just as importantly, a direct affront to me and the members of this committee who have so ardently supported efforts to collect information on our enemies." He added: "The U.S. Congress simply should not have to play Twenty Questions to get the information that it deserves under our Constitution."

Developing…

http://www.crooksandliars.com/posts/2006/07/08/hoekstra-failing-to-inform-congress-of-spying-projects-might-be-illegal/
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
demosincebirth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-08-06 06:03 PM
Response to Original message
1. Sound like he might be in tight reelection campaign.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kentuck Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-08-06 06:10 PM
Response to Original message
2. that weasel !
"might" be illegal? There's so much shit they are not telling him. Because he is a weasel.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
demosincebirth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-08-06 06:30 PM
Response to Reply #2
4. .Self Delete
Edited on Sat Jul-08-06 06:32 PM by augie38
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jackpine Radical Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-08-06 06:24 PM
Response to Original message
3. Thanks, CW. I'm speculating...
In the absence of details on the nature of what Hoekstra found out, I see two major possibilities.

First, and least likely, is that Hoekstra found out the Bushies have been doing something something so egregious that even he, the apologist extraordinaire, can't stomach it.

Second, and more likely, he found out the Bushies have been doing something truly awful that he fears is about to get publicly exposed somehow, and he is maneuvering to distance himself from the impending shit hemmorhage.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kentuck Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-08-06 06:34 PM
Response to Reply #3
5. He probably wasn't informed of the banking records spying...
which Feinstein says she was told nothing about it and no one on the Intellgience Committee was told about it, she said.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CatWoman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-08-06 06:36 PM
Response to Reply #3
6. as Augie said above
the rat bastard is probably worried about his reelection.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jackpine Radical Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-08-06 07:10 PM
Response to Reply #6
9. Well, I'm sure he's worried about the election, but
this seems to be too big a deal for the SWIFT business, which they already have pretty well papered over. Somehow I think there was something new and really dirty that triggered this thing. Why gratuitously raise the suspicion that there's some additional, really bad thing out there if there isn't?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Monkeyman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-08-06 06:50 PM
Response to Original message
7. New York Times has his letter in fdf form
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CatWoman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-08-06 06:51 PM
Response to Reply #7
8. can you post the link, please?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 16th 2024, 06:13 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC