Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Recent Arrests in Terror Plots Yield Debate on Pre-emptive

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
 
spindrifter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-08-06 10:11 PM
Original message
Recent Arrests in Terror Plots Yield Debate on Pre-emptive
Action by Government

By ERIC LIPTON
Published: July 9, 2006
WASHINGTON, July 8 — In Miami last month and now in New York, terror cases have unfolded in which suspects have been apprehended before they lined up the intended weapons and the necessary financing or figured out other central details necessary to carry out their plots.

For officials in Washington, it is a demonstration of the much-needed emphasis in this post-9/11 era for pre-emptive arrests.

<snip>

But the Miami and New York cases are inspiring a new round of skepticism from some lawyers who are openly questioning whether the government, in its zeal to stop terrorism, is forgetting an element central to any case: the actual intent to commit a crime.

"Talk without any kind of an action means nothing," said Martin R. Stolar, a New York defense lawyer. "You start to criminalize people who are not really criminals."

<snip>

http://www.nytimes.com/2006/07/09/us/09plot.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
rustydog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-08-06 10:16 PM
Response to Original message
1. I don't think that is the problem...the justice department
hasn't done shit since the last election. november mid-terms are coming up fast and the
Republicans are knee deep in shit poor approval ratings.
All of the sudden, we have terror arrests!

How many will be made in august, Sept? taking any bets?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mayberry Machiavelli Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-08-06 10:16 PM
Response to Original message
2. Yes, and when there's no requirement for hard evidence to arrest, you
can produce a splashy arrest, complete with news stories, of any randomly framed group of suspicious seeming individuals, at any time of your convenience, like, say near an election.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Eugene Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-08-06 10:28 PM
Response to Original message
3. Rounding up the usual suspects
Edited on Sat Jul-08-06 10:32 PM by Eugene
In a related AP article, Michael Chertoff is touting a proactive and preventative
approach to potential terror plots. Expect a lot more of these plots to be
disrupted over the next four months.

Priority Shifts to Disruption of Plots

By DAVID B. CARUSO
The Associated Press
Saturday, July 8, 2006; 9:09 PM
<snip>
"We don't wait until someone has lit the fuse (to) step in and
prevent something from happening. That would be playing games
with peoples' lives," Homeland Security Secretary Michael Chertoff
said Friday as Assem Hammoud's arrest in Lebanon was being
announced.
<snip>
The formative nature of the suspected plots prompted skepticism.

Joseph Cirincione, a national security analyst for the Center
for American Progress, a liberal think tank, said he worried
that the arrests of rather minor conspirators were being
played up for political purposes.

"This is starting to look like the president's version of rounding
up the usual suspects," he said. "There is a pattern of dramatic
announcements, followed by revelations that these plots weren't
as serious as we all initially thought."
<snip>

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2006/07/08/AR2006070800513.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ThoughtCriminal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-08-06 10:32 PM
Response to Original message
4. Internet chats v. Reality
How many times in the past few years have we seen idle threats by right-wingers against various Middle-Eastern targets and even domestic locations? This is given a pass, despite a history that proves that these threats are not "Just talk" (Oklahoma City, Atlanta, Birmingham...)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-08-06 10:41 PM
Response to Original message
5. way past time to start questioning the concept of pre-emption!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
originalpckelly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-08-06 11:28 PM
Response to Original message
6. I think this line is the best description of the new "policy"
"It was essential that the F.B.I. get rid of its pre-9/11 mentality of not making an arrest until they have enough evidence to convict..." --Rep. Peter King

Um, excuse me? Does this sound just a *little* wrong to anyone else? Doesn't it sound like "thought-crime"? Dangerous territory. Very dangerous.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blues90 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-08-06 11:34 PM
Response to Original message
7. I refuse to buy into one more line of
terrorist crap , i don't believe it or buy into it .if it happen then I will suspect it was staged , always will always have . Yes people did die on sept 11th 2001 and it was horrid to see but forget the story of how it happened . If i become a victim them i won't know about it , so that said if it happens it happens and I am not spending one second being afraid or worried ,there is nothing I could do to avoid one anymore than i can avoid an earthquake here .
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 11:15 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC