http://www.eastvalleytribune.com/index.php?sty=69183 The matter hinges on what appears to be a transcript of a live discussion on the Senate floor on Dec. 21, 2005, between senators Kyl of Arizona, Lindsey Graham of South Carolina and Sam Brownback of Kansas.
...
The transcript of the bogus discussion was submitted into the official Congressional Record after the actual debate had concluded.
Then in February, Kyl and Graham cited the unspoken conversation in a brief to the Supreme Court as an example of the legislative intent behind the act.
The Supreme Court outed Kyl and Graham last week for their not-ready-for-real-time performance by bringing it up in a footnote in its decision in the landmark case Hamdan v. Rumsfeld.
And what did Sens. Kyl and Graham say about the SCOTUS ruling?
http://lgraham.senate.gov/index.cfm?mode=presspage&id=258047“We are disappointed with the Supreme Court’s decision. However, we believe the problems cited by the Court can and should be fixed.
"It is inappropriate to try terrorists in civilian courts. It threatens our national security and places the safety of jurors in danger. For those reasons and others, we believe terrorists should be tried before military commissions.
"In his opinion, Justice Breyer set forth the path to a solution of this problem. He wrote, ‘Nothing prevents the president from returning to Congress to seek the authority he believes necessary.’
"We intend to pursue legislation in the Senate granting the Executive Branch the authority to ensure that terrorists can be tried by competent military commissions. Working together, Congress and the administration can draft a fair, suitable, and constitutionally permissible tribunal statute."
Guess they better hurry up and get those Miami 7 released from those CIVLIAN JAILS and be sure they aren't tried in a CIVILIAN COURT!!