Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

In light of FTW's break-in... Site Security -What you should know.

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
 
mikelewis Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-09-06 02:23 AM
Original message
In light of FTW's break-in... Site Security -What you should know.
Edited on Sun Jul-09-06 02:27 AM by mikelewis
The intent of this post is not to sell anything or convince you that you need to run out and purchase anything from myself or any store. After reading about the break-in at Mr. Ruppert’s office FTW I thought I’d share with you some things I know about security. These tips can apply to your home or office and hopefully the unfortunate incident at Mr. Ruppert’s office will get you thinking about intrusion protection in your life as well. This is a very long post but hopefully you’ll find it worthwhile…

Protecting your physical site from forced entry is not as difficult or expensive as you would think. Here are a few tips to help you lay out a security plan that won't cost you a lot of money, won't stifle your lifestyle and will deter even the most aggressive burglars or vandals.

Before I start, a little background on my experience; I’ve been an alarm installer for the past 9 years. In that time, I've heard just about every type of forcible entry story there is. From the kid down the street breaking in to steal Playstation games to organized thieves rolling up in a rented truck dressed as movers to clean out an entire house in broad daylight, I have seen just about everything. I've handled both large and small security installations however my forte and preference is residential installations. I take security very seriously because I know it not only saves property but saves lives as well.

When you make the decision to upgrade your current security level, there are a few things to consider in designing a plan that meets your needs. One thing you need to understand is that no matter where you live, no matter how safe you believe your location is, your site is vulnerable. Even in the areas where the police maintain an active presence and actually respond to break-ins are susceptible. Police are not usually a deterrent to this type of crime; they are a reactive force not a proactive deterrent. Filling out reports and occasionally fingerprinting a broken window is usually all you can expect from your local police department (if you live in Cleveland, don’t even waste your time expecting this much police attention. You’re lucky if they even answer the phone).

The first thing you should do once you make the decision to enhance your security is to take a walk around your site and access your vulnerable entry points. Try to think like a burglar and determine the easiest or quickest ways to gain entrance. Most break-ins are crimes of opportunity. If a site looks relatively safe and easy to enter, a burglar will choose your site over one that has visible signs of active security measures. Make sure that your site has adequate exterior lighting and has the appearance that it is actively occupied. Exterior motion activated lights go a long way in deterring a would-be intruder. Also, a site that appears occupied is far less likely of falling victim to a break-in. A clever and relatively inexpensive way of giving a residence or business that “lived in” look is home automation technology offered by X-10. There are many websites that offer these products and give good advice on how to apply it to your site.

During your walk around your site, pay particular attention to your windows and doors. Ground level windows and entry doors are usually the areas that an intruder chooses to enter. Check to make sure that your windows and doors all have functioning and secure locks and deadbolts where applicable. Often times an intruder doesn’t even need to break anything to “break” in. Forgetting to lock a door or window makes entering your site quick and easy so get in the habit of inspecting your perimeter entry points before you leave your site or retire for the evening. However, even if your windows and doors are always secure, make sure you assess the quality of your locks. Some locks are very easy to bypass with something as simple as a pair of channel locks or even a credit card. If you don’t know the quality of your locks, call your local hardware store and describe the type and brand of lock you have and find out if what you have is sufficient. A note about sliding doors; sliding doors are very vulnerable so ensure that your locking mechanism is sound and absolutely invest in an anti-lift locking device to stop a would-be intruder from lifting your door out of its track with a pry bar or screw driver.

Hardening your exterior entry points is a critical first step to enhancing your security and should go a long way in deterring a forcible entry. However, a determined intruder will not be stopped by a lock. Most will use what I call the “universal key” to enter your site. The universal key is a crowbar mixed with some old fashioned elbow grease and in no time, the intruder will be in your site. Intruders do not like smashing windows or prying open doors to gain entry but they will and do quite often (according to national FBI statistics this happens about every 15 seconds).

To deter an intruder once they have entered your site you will need to have either a very large dog or have a security system of some kind to drive the intruder away. Dogs are very good at providing deterrence to intrusion however these are also subject to the “universal key”. A determined intruder can silence a dog just as easily as smashing a window so I highly recommend installing an electronic security system over getting a watchdog. Also, in most commercial application, this is not even an option and the benefits and costs of owning a dog should be self-evident so I’m going to move on to electronic security applications.

The most important thing to consider when investigating what sort of electronic security system is right for you is the reality that no matter how elaborate your security system is, it is still just a deterrent. Security systems cannot stop a break-in, they cannot stop someone from taking what you have or vandalizing your belongings but they can dissuade them and often times reduce the damage or loss from an intrusion. Security systems are designed to inform the intruder that someone, whether the police, a neighbor or the owner, is aware of their intrusion and en route to the site. This reality is usually sufficient to drive an intruder away or even stop them from entering in the first place; if the presence of the system is noted by placards, stickers or yard signs. According to national FBI crime statistics, less than 2% of the sites burglarized had active security systems so if you think of a security system as a contraceptive, you’ll be in the right frame of mind when deciding on what type of system to get.

There are two types of security systems that I am going to cover. The first type is the electronic security system most of you are probably familiar with already. Even if you’ve never used one, you’ve seen them around in many different places. This system usually is operated from some style of touchpad located near an entry door that arms and disarms the interior and perimeter protection devices. These are usually quite simple to operate as most usually only require a user-programmable access code for operation. Do not be intimidated by these systems as they are designed for ease of use. I’m not going to cover all the specifics of the different type’s security peripherals available as this information is covered by hundreds of security websites. Do a search on “home security” and in no time you’ll have a good understanding of the options available to you that you can add to your system.

There are two things I am going to suggest you get if you do decide on a security system. The first is fire protection. A monitored smoke detector actually calls the fire department for you if a fire breaks out while you are away or if you are rendered unconscious from noxious fumes. Without monitored fire protection, it takes on average 29 minutes for the fire department to find out there's a fire in your site; with monitored fire protection that time is cut down to 4 minutes. I strongly urge you to consider this option if you decide a security system is right for you. One other thing you should most certainly add to your system is a loud outside siren and maybe a strobe light too. The noise and the light will go a long way to drive off an intruder especially if the police response is slow or, in my city’s case, non-existent.

Now, I'd like to cover how to save money when purchasing a system and what to avoid when making your decision on what sort of system to buy. There are many retailers out there that do not tell you the disadvantages to the different kinds of systems available. If the system you’re looking at is a self-contained wireless system, avoid it like the plague. These systems have a major flaw in their design because all of the vital components of the system, like the dialer, CPU and siren are all contained in the keypad. If you disable the keypad, you disable the system. By the way, I’m not telling you anything the burglars don’t already know; I’ve changed out many of these systems because they have been defeated with ease by intruders. The type of system you will want is a hard-wired system that has a control panel/dialer and siren separate from the keypad. Most hard-wired systems have wireless capabilities so if your site requires wireless contacts due to a finished basement or no basement at all you’ll be able to add on this type of contact without sacrificing your security.

When buying a system from an alarm company, your bill can needlessly climb to astronomical heights if you want full security coverage. With a little net-savvy buying skills, for only a few hundred dollars you can get a system that would cost you thousands of dollars if you purchased it from an alarm company. The best way to go about buying a system is to determine which brand of security system to buy and then buy all of the peripherals that are compatible with that system. Most hard-wired contacts can be installed on any panel so don’t worry about brand names with these types. However, wireless contacts are usually brand specific so make sure if you’re buying an Ademco, DSC, or some other professional grade panel you’ll want to buy the same brand of wireless contacts to match as the others probably won’t work. For example, the panel I usually install is the Ademco Vista Series panel and it can use any of the wireless Ademco contacts but one’s made by DSC will not work. My suggestion is to research either of these brands of panels and then go shopping on EBay as this is usually where you’ll get the best price.

Once you have the system and all the sensors you want, contact Service Magic or some other contractor locating service and get a bid on the installation price. You should expect to pay anywhere from $150 to $200 for the basic install which includes the panel, keypad, siren, phone connection, 3 doors and 1 motion. Any additional equipment should cost you roughly $15 an item for hard-wired and $10 an item for wireless. A note about windows: buy wireless. Windows are a pain in the ass and most likely will be a pain in your wallet so just plan on going wireless for any windows you want to add in.

If you’re only interested in the basic system mentioned above and you are planning on having it monitored by a central station anyway, the best way to get a system is to go through a national alarm dealer program. Generally, you’ll pay about $100 for the basic system and the installation. They recoup the cost of the system and install over the length of the contract which is usually 36 months so they’re not losing any money. The monitoring rate should be about $30 a month. If you’re looking to get a lot of extras though, purchase the extras the way I described and ask them to install the extra contacts for you at the rough price I listed above. They may charge you a little more than that but it’ll be worth it in the long run. Just find out what brand they use and you shouldn’t have any problems.

The second type of security system you can get is a surveillance system. These tend to be a bit pricier but not only do they act as a deterrent, they can also assist the police in apprehending the intruder. However, there is one thing you need to keep in mind when purchasing a surveillance system, you should, without a doubt, have an electronic security system as well. The problem you’ll run into during a break-in is that more often than not, the intruder will either destroy your recording equipment or (as in the case of this auto repair shop I dealt with a while back) steal the equipment. Nothing sucks worse than having your security system stolen so protect it. I posted some guidelines on how to purchase a CCTV system on another board a while back so I’m just cutting and pasting that post here.

When buying the cameras, expect to pay anywhere between $80-$150 for a good one. Then get 4. You can mix and match it; does not matter. Get something that has 1/3" CCD, a verifocal lens 4-9 mm and has at least 12 leds to illuminate in total darkness. You shouldn't have a hard time finding one's like this and they should fall right in that price range.

Find yourself some wire, they have it in selections of 10', 25', 50', 100' and 150' with both the power and video lines so hook up is a snap. Just make sure everything is BNC connections only. RCA connections have generally been for lower grade cameras anyway but I guess there may be some decent ones with this connector, I don't know. I'd say stick with BNC and you're gonna do alright.
Get power supply's. Best thing to do is make sure you get the right transformers when you buy the camera. The camera should be 12V or 24V; 9V is crap, don't buy it.

You can get a good dvr for about $300 - $500 on ebay. 4 channel with an 80gb Hd will be fine for about 2 to 3 days on constant recording with pretty good quality. When choosing compression, try and stay away from wavelet and don't get a pc based system. Get a stand-alone, it's a lot more stable and can't be hacked into (well, almost can't) Most of all, don't trade quality for quantity, it's better to spend a little more to add an additional hard drive than to cut down your vid quality.
Also, when you're buying, try and buy the system from a vendor. Vendors offer great deals and even more, they offer technical support that is invaluable when you get into trouble. If you screw up royal or just feel overwhelmed, don't worry, log onto an online referral service or call up a local security company and tell them you need to contract out one of their guys for a camera job. They can be pricey but you'd have to do the same if you bought costco and couldn't install it. The bottom line is, those proprietary systems are junk and don't offer the quality you're gonna want. The pictures are crap and the recording is usually pretty bad. For $800, you can do a lot better and even if you have to spend closer to $1000; at least you'd get what you paid for.

There's a lot to installing a camera system but with a little internet surfing and some bargains, you can piece together a very decent system for about the same price as a store bought one.


Securing your physical site whether its your office or home falls right in line with two old sayings, “An ounce of prevention is worth a pound of cure” and a “Penny saved is a penny earned”. Hopefully, this post can help you realize the truth in both of these expressions. With any luck, this post has inspired you to take a second look at your security and I urge you to search the net for other tips on securing your premises and you’ll find that many of them are common sense solutions and usually low to no cost. As I stated before, I am not trying to get you to run out and buy anything from myself or anyone else, I’m just hoping that you’ll take some of these tips or tips from other sites and use them to keep you and your family safe.
God bless you all,
Mike

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-09-06 03:07 AM
Response to Original message
1. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
bananas Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-09-06 04:18 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. Reminds me of a conversation between Emerson and Thoreau
Emerson: "Why are you in here?"
Thoreau: "Why aren't you in here?"
:hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-09-06 04:52 AM
Response to Reply #1
4. FTW hated by "truth-movement" wackos?
When did that happen?
9-11 truth movement folk still regularly refer to Rupert's book "Crossing the Rubicon".

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Up2Late Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-09-06 01:06 PM
Response to Reply #4
11. Search his last name here.
You'll see.

And I'm referring to the "...WTC had pre-planted bombs in it..." crowd, not the non-crazies, though people here apparently don't see the difference anymore, so I guess the discrediting of all scheme is working perfectly.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-09-06 10:58 PM
Response to Reply #11
12. Mike Rupert says pre-planten explosives,
Edited on Sun Jul-09-06 11:05 PM by rman
and you're saying the '"...WTC had pre-planted bombs in it..." crowd' hates him? So they're saying the same thing, why would they hate him?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Up2Late Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-10-06 03:34 AM
Response to Reply #12
13. I don't think he ever said that. Have you even been to his web site?
Just do a search of our own September 11 forum for his name and or website name, if I say much more about the subject here, it'll just get deleted. Here a link to one, but you have to read the responses and their attitude toward him to understand what I'm talking about, especially the website mentioned in post #22:

<http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=show_topic&forum=125&topic_id=79396>
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-10-06 09:36 AM
Response to Reply #13
14. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
Up2Late Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-10-06 09:53 PM
Response to Reply #14
15. Oh, you are talking about 7, that different from what...
...I was referring to. What I'm talking about is the people who, probably in the last 2 years, have begun to claim the two main towers (1&2) were brought down by controlled demolition. Most of them are same people who claim those where either military cargo jets or missiles the hit the towers too. I still have a few problems with the official story about 7 myself, and it didn't help that it took until October 2005 for NIST to finally release a final report that included the report on 7.

NIST is an agency of the U.S. Commerce Department's Technology Administration. Here's a link to the report: <http://wtc.nist.gov/pubs/>

I don't go to his website much anymore, but I notice he hasn't written much since 2003 (other than finising his book) on the subject. I don't want it to sound like I'm taking credit for it, but I do remember e-mailing him and AJ back about that time when I noticed that a lot of Disinfo was beginning to cloud the story and it seemed like he was going that way too.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-11-06 01:31 AM
Response to Reply #15
20. Oh, you're an OCT-er of sorts? That explains a lot.
All these things, including the NIST report have been discussed extensively in the 9-11 forum, where i'm a regular. I don't recall seeing you there very often, which goes some way toward explaining why you think i might not know about Ruppert's website or what NIST is.

The point is Ruppert does not deny MIHOP, including CD - so those CT-ers who think MIHOP, including CD, have no reason to hate Ruppert. In fact Ruppert's book is still regularly referred to as a good starting point for people who want to learn about more than just the (records of) physical evidence involved in 9-11.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Up2Late Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-11-06 12:52 PM
Response to Reply #20
24. I was very into the issue for a while, but that forum just got too nasty.
Trying to argue with people who have little direct knowledge or understanding of the nature of the evidence they are using, just got too frustrating.

I did find some very interesting new info and sources of high quality video, here's a link to where I posted it: <http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=132x2704451>
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Viva_La_Revolution Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-09-06 04:51 AM
Response to Original message
3. Most of your advise is perfect, but I have 2 issues...
First... Monitored service. When I worked for a national company (which shall remain nameless for the moment) it was not unusual to have 20-40 min. response times to alarms. The system would 'burp' and the last 30 min. of alarms would scroll up so fast the techs would miss the calls.

Better response can be had just by installing a horn that goes off when the system does. Irate neighbors calling the cops gets much faster response.

Second - X-10 products SUCK. For every 10 I sold (at a security system distributor), I had 4 returns.

Things may have changed in the 8 years since I was in the industry... I hope I'm wrong here.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EFerrari Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-09-06 07:31 AM
Response to Reply #3
7. V iva! I think I worked for the same nameless guys!
Response time varies a great deal from jurisdiction to jurisdiction, doesn't it? We didn't miss much but I'm surprised we didn't miss more.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Viva_La_Revolution Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-09-06 12:19 PM
Response to Reply #7
9. Luckily, I was in the file room, where it was quiet and slow-paced.
I got to hear all the grumbling from the people on the floor during breaks.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EFerrari Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-09-06 12:26 PM
Response to Reply #9
10. I worked swingshift, usually holidays and weekends.
I can still remember who had a dog and a squeaky window and a motorcycle next door. :silly:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pitohui Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-10-06 10:37 PM
Response to Reply #3
16. we had a terrible experience w. x-10 products
Edited on Mon Jul-10-06 10:38 PM by pitohui
we had to return the entire system not once but multiple times

there's crap and then there's downright dirty stinking broken crap

i hate x-10!

i feel safer w. a little sign saying "this house protected by smith and wesson," it might be tacky it don't come broken out of a brand new box
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-09-06 04:55 AM
Response to Original message
5. ID data companies might also want to pay attention to this...
http://www.privacyrights.org/ar/ChronDataBreaches.htm
...
TOTAL number of records containing sensitive personal information involved in security breaches
88,931,692
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
zalinda Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-09-06 07:23 AM
Response to Original message
6. There is another deterrent if you live in a house
it's a barberry shrub. Plant one under windows. They grow fast, and have thorns on them. They grow almost anywhere, and even a brown thumber could keep one alive. You do have to trim them, as they can grow a little wild. But, if you want to keep a window open, this plant will keep people out. They are dense and are also used for hedges, but be careful where you plant one as it will scratch the hell out of you.

zalinda
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pitohui Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-10-06 10:40 PM
Response to Reply #6
17. yes i'm a firm believer in the hostile angry shrubbery
it is one of the cheapest protectors around if you ask me
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kingshakabobo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-10-06 10:49 PM
Response to Reply #17
19. Maybe I won't dig a mote after all.
"Angry shrubbery"...LOL
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MadHound Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-09-06 07:49 AM
Response to Original message
8. Sorry, but coming from the other end of the spectrum
IE, having spent part of my misspent youth being a thief, I have to disagree with you. Electronic security systems are much easier to deal with than a dog. Cameras can be avoided or fooled, circuits can be cut or bypassed. Or power can simply be cut altogether. There have been cases where the thieves have even gotten a man working on the inside of the security firm, thus opening the door, so to speak, for his buddies

A seventy to hundred plus pound dog is an entirely different matter altogether. First off, the cardinal rule of any thief is to draw as little attention to themselves as possible. A fight with a dog does exactly the opposite, it draws lots of attention to the premises. Not only is the dog barking, growling and raising a ruckus, but any attempt to shut the dog up is going to be loud. The only sure fire way of silencing a dog, ie poisoned meat or treats, can be avoided by simply training the dog to take such treats from your hand only. Gunshots are loud and undesirable, and getting into a dog-man fight is a messy, loud, dangerous business

In addition, dogs are instant defense. Whereas most alarm systems have a police response time of three minutes or longer, plenty of time to snatch and run, dogs are there, on site, and will prevent even the most determined person from proceeding. Witness my sister. She lives out in the country, and has always had a good size dog. She and her husband were away at work one day when two men broke into their house through the basement sliding door. At the time, their thirteen year old pit bull/boxer mix was in the laundry room, getting a drink. As these thiefs made their way across the basement, their dog stalked them, and then struck. He put a crippling bite into one man's leg, and turned and badly wounded the other on the arm. With the dog now between them and their entrance, the men fled upstairs, dog at their heels, were attacked again as they fumbled with the front door lock, managed to get out and shut the dog up in the house. However their wounds were of sufficient severity that they had to go to the hospital and thus were caught.

These men had a gun with them, however they didn't want to use it, for it would alert the neighbors. They were hit quickly and badly, and were panicked and left. I've always had a large dog, and have lived in some very rough neighborhoods. But my dwelling was never burglarized, was never touched. Between word getting around the neighborhood, and my dogs barking at the windows, my place soon became a place known to be avoided.
In fact in interviews with jailed thieves, it has been found that if a thief finds out one way or the other that a dog is on premise, they will move on to the next place, even if it has alarms. Dealing with alarms is quiet, and they don't fight back.

And your dog doesn't have to be trained to be a guard dog. Simply love them, care for them, and their pack instinct will take over. They consider your house to be their house, and will defend it to the death. All of my dogs have actually been quite gentle, but are very protective of my house and family. This is simply natural instinct of the animal.

Electronic alarms are able to be dealt with quietly, discreetly, without fuss or muss if you know what you're doing. Even if you're a punk smash and grabber, you can break into a house, grab the most obviously valuable goods, and be gone long before the cops show up. If you want real protection and deterence, get yourself a good size dog.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pitohui Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-10-06 10:43 PM
Response to Reply #8
18. but you will lose your homeowner's insurance
unfortunately at this time of century a large dog is no longer an option for many homeowners if they want to have insurance on their home because they face cancellation of their insurance if the insurer finds out they own such a dog

your sister is lucky that she didn't lose everything she had to the thieves, here, a thief can sue if injured by a "dangerous" dog
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MadHound Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-11-06 05:43 AM
Response to Reply #18
21. I don't know where you live
But here in Missouri, we're still pretty sensible about these things. Having a large dog is not a hit on one's insurance rates, nor does a thief have the ability to sue if they break into a house and get a chunk taken out of their ass. There have been some stirrings on those two fronts, but so far all such legislation has failed. But yes, I hear about this going on in other states and can't help but wonder if this is some sort of concerted effort to get rid of dogs, and instead get everybody onto some sort of home security plan. The better to track us all with, don't you know. And provide substandard security to boot.

Frankly I will fight tooth and nail to prevent any such legislation from passing in this state, and if it does, well they can deal with me before taking my dogs away.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
zalinda Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-11-06 06:21 AM
Response to Reply #21
22. No, it's not an effort to get rid of dogs,
big or otherwise. Certain dogs are known for biting, and these are the dogs that can interfere with insurance. And some cities are banning pit bulls, because of the dog attacks that have happened involving them, and to try and curtail dog fighting. I don't blame the dogs, but the owners, but after they have been trained, they cannot be rehabilitated.

zalinda
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MadHound Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-11-06 08:32 AM
Response to Reply #22
23. You are correct, it isn't the dogs that are to blame
But the asshole owners who take a sweet, lovable pup and abuse them to the point where they are vicious killing machines. And sadly, while this can sort of treatment can be done to any dog, it seems that it is used mostly on pit bulls(who were at one time rated as the best family dog one could own) and rottweillers. Used to be that German Shepards and Dobermans were the bad boy dogs, but I suppose fashions change.

However I do think that there is indeed a concerted effort to rid homes of dogs, at least large dogs. As you stated there are cities and even states that are now banning certain large breeds of dogs. Insurance companies are raising rates for homes that house large dogs. And animal shelters across the country have adopted the practice of putting down certain breeds or mixes, no matter their age or temperment. This all adds up to an effort to discourage the ownership of certain large breeds or mixes.

In addition, there is the ongoing onslaught of propaganda from home security companies and others that is simultaneously downplaying the effectiveness of dogs for home security and instead pushing home security systems. This is normal, capitalistic behavior, but sadly it flys in the face of reality.

Oh, one other thing. Given the propensity of various private corporations to cooperate with the government in stripping our rights and handing over our private information, I would much rather have a dog in the house than a home security system. Whereas a home security system can be turned off in order to carry out a sneak and peek warrant, dogs don't have an off switch, and thus act as an ongoing deterrent for such gross violations of our privacy rights.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 04:26 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC