Wonk
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Jul-10-06 03:58 AM
Original message |
Nader. Nadernadernadernader. Nadernader. Nader. |
|
Are you opposed to people running as 'further left' against incumbent 'moderate' Democrats in their democratic primaries, like what's been happening to Joe Lieberman and Hillary Clinton, with their eventual goal to be on the ticket as the Democratic Party candidate for their state in November?
Nader.
|
Flubadubya
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Jul-10-06 04:01 AM
Response to Original message |
1. If they are REAL progressives I say... |
|
GO FOR IT! We've got to start weeding out the DINOs in our "Democratic" leadership.
|
Skidmore
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Jul-10-06 04:05 AM
Response to Original message |
|
to hell with Nader. If he turns up as the "progressive candidate" on a national ballot, he will not get my vote.
|
ulysses
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Jul-10-06 04:06 AM
Response to Original message |
Wonk
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Jul-10-06 04:11 AM
Response to Reply #3 |
4. Hey there, ulysses :) Remember when all you needed was "Nader" in the |
|
headline and the thread would be guaranteed to keep flaming until locked with 300+ posts? I wonder if that's still true :party:
|
ulysses
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Jul-10-06 04:17 AM
Response to Reply #4 |
|
You got my attention. :D Good to see you around.
|
readmoreoften
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Jul-10-06 04:19 AM
Response to Original message |
6. What does nader have to do with it? I'm lost. |
|
Both Tasini and Ned Lamont are running as Dems. No spoilers.
|
AndyTiedye
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Jul-10-06 04:25 AM
Response to Original message |
|
Just don't do a NADER and split the Dems in the general election.
|
readmoreoften
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Jul-10-06 04:45 AM
Response to Reply #7 |
8. Of course not. But there's nothing wrong with competition in primaries. |
|
Why would we be against more choices in a primary? Especially if they're good ones.
|
Richard Steele
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Jul-10-06 04:50 AM
Response to Original message |
9. 70% of Americans are currently "Further Left" than Hillary and Joementum! |
|
People haven't changed so much, STANDARDS and DEFINITIONS have!
And leave that TOOL Nader out of this; he's long since proven that he has become nothing but an advertisement for himSELF.
An older, much wiser man than I am told me the other year: "By today's standards, Richard Nixon governed as a moderate liberal".
Ask me his name.
G'head, ax me.
|
readmoreoften
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Jul-10-06 05:10 AM
Response to Reply #9 |
10. What's his name, dick? What's his name??? /nt |
Richard Steele
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Jul-10-06 05:24 AM
Response to Reply #10 |
11. Well, since you just had to ask: His name is George McGovern... |
|
Edited on Mon Jul-10-06 05:36 AM by dicksteele
...same as it was when he ran against Nixon.
Just about the most LIBERAL sonuvagun on the face of God's green earth...
A man who personally accepts the BLAME for helping the Repubs to turn "liberal" into a 'bad word' in the USA's mental dictionary.
And even HE says that NIXON was a "Moderate Liberal" by TODAY'S definition of "Conservative".
|
Vidar
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Jul-10-06 05:30 AM
Response to Reply #9 |
12. I like the quote. Compared to Bush, paranoia aside, Nixon is defensible |
mucifer
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Jul-10-06 07:18 AM
Response to Reply #12 |
14. Nixon founded the EPA. He wasn't 100% evil. |
papau
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Jul-10-06 05:48 AM
Response to Original message |
13. The left running in Dem primaries is great if No spoiler "3rd parties" |
|
Edited on Mon Jul-10-06 05:49 AM by papau
in the general election.
Indeed that is the only way in a winner take all system - a non-parliamentary system - to move the Dem party and the nation to the left without giving the right 50 years of control of the government.
|
Moderator
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Jul-10-06 07:41 AM
Response to Original message |
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Tue May 14th 2024, 01:06 AM
Response to Original message |