Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Lieberman accuses Lamont of being a closet Republican

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
 
sabra Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-10-06 09:14 AM
Original message
Lieberman accuses Lamont of being a closet Republican

http://www.courant.com/news/local/hc-doublel0709.artjul09,0,7875943.story?coll=hc-headlines-home

<snip>

Lieberman, 64, aired a new television commercial accusing Lamont of being a closet Republican who has distorted the incumbent's 18-year record in the Senate. The spot said Lieberman votes with Democrats 90 percent of the time.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
originalpckelly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-10-06 09:16 AM
Response to Original message
1. ROFL!!!
:rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
geomon666 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-10-06 09:33 AM
Response to Reply #1
20. Ditto
:rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
goclark Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-10-06 09:16 AM
Response to Original message
2. Closet! What is he trying to tell us ~ Joey is slime

and he can hardly talk about anybody being in the closet, pocket of the Republicans.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
smtpgirl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-10-06 10:06 AM
Response to Reply #2
35. Do I sense that Lieberman is projecting??
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
usregimechange Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-10-06 09:17 AM
Response to Original message
3. The ACLU's National Freedom Scorecard: Lifetime score: 67%
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
survivor999 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-10-06 09:17 AM
Response to Original message
4. Ah, as opposed to being openly Republican?
LOL!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-10-06 09:18 AM
Response to Original message
5. By their projections ye shall know them--this indicates that it's
LIEberman who's the closet Rethug.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
twiterpatted Donating Member (216 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-10-06 09:18 AM
Response to Original message
6. Lieberman has jumped the shark!!
I would love to see this ad' of a half necked Joe on water skies jumping a shark and giving the thumbs up.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kentuck Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-10-06 09:19 AM
Response to Original message
7. Pot..
Kettle..
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Totally Committed Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-10-06 09:19 AM
Response to Original message
8. He did that to Wes constanatly throughout the Primaries, only
he left out the "closet" part. He just fights dirty. That's how Republicans do it... they smear their opponents because they haven't got a decent position on any issue that counts.

Oh, no... poor Joe, he has no scruples. :rofl:

TC
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JNelson6563 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-10-06 09:40 AM
Original message
That's because
Ol' Joe is a Rethug at heart and only knows that same tired, old Rethug tactic: Take your biggest fault and project it onto your opponent(s).

I sure hope Lamont beats him. :toast:

Julie
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rocktivity Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-10-06 09:19 AM
Response to Original message
9. Rocknation accuses Liberman of being a closet Republican
because he's resorting to the old Republican trick of accusing Lamont of the very thing he's guilty of!

:rofl:
rocknation
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dinger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-10-06 09:25 AM
Response to Reply #9
11. Psych 101: Isn't That A Defense Mechanism Called "Projection"?
Just asking. LIEber"man", what a loser. He's desperate, and it shows.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FuzzyDicePHL Donating Member (698 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-10-06 10:02 AM
Response to Reply #11
32. AKA:
"The guilty dog barks the loudest."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
seabeyond Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-10-06 09:23 AM
Response to Original message
10. dont know lemont, so wont say not. but,... lieber picked up republican
rove ways in more ways than one. take what you are being accused of and give it to opponent. if that isnt bullshit. throw that in liebermans face. what bullshit
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Maestro Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-10-06 09:26 AM
Response to Original message
12. Kettle, black, does this meaning anything to you
Joe? :eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
UTUSN Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-10-06 09:27 AM
Response to Original message
13. As opposed to Joementum being an OUT-Repuke? (on certain things) n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
partylessinOhio Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-10-06 09:27 AM
Response to Original message
14. Now, he's swiftboating Lamont.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KingFlorez Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-10-06 09:28 AM
Response to Original message
15. Joe has a point
There is something very suspicious about Lamont and I'm glad Joe has come out and said something.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sabra Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-10-06 09:32 AM
Response to Reply #15
18. Do you have link providing more info on your suspicions?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KingFlorez Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-10-06 09:34 AM
Response to Reply #18
21. Lamont's endorsed by a bitter ex-Republican Lieberman defeated
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LynzM Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-10-06 09:42 AM
Response to Reply #21
26. Who is that?
Got any more info? Thanks.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KingFlorez Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-10-06 09:49 AM
Response to Reply #26
29. Lowell Weicker
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Gato Moteado Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-10-06 10:03 AM
Response to Reply #29
34. wait a minute!
you're suspicious of lamont because an ex-repub senator from 18 years ago came out in support of him? that's it? is there more?

bill o'reilly, ann coulter, sean hannity, and a host of wingnuts are supporting lieberman, but because a self proclaimed anti-war ex-repub senator says he supports lamont, you're suspicious of him and willing to agree with lieberman's charge that he's a closet repub?

you lost me.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
calico1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-10-06 10:18 AM
Response to Reply #29
36. Lowell Weiker was a Republican but
Edited on Mon Jul-10-06 10:21 AM by calico1
he was a Republican of the old 60's kind of Moderate Republican. He is not fond of this Administration by the way or the wingnuts in general.

As for Lamont voting 90% of the time with Republicans, yes he did....on things like repairing potholes and stuff like that where the vote is unanimous. Duh. (The "duh" is meant for Lieberman, not you).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Beelzebud Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-10-06 10:52 AM
Response to Reply #36
44. I LOVED Lamonts reply in the debate.
"I voted on potholes, in the Senate you vote on principles."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
atreides1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-10-06 09:44 AM
Response to Reply #21
27. That wasn't the question
The question was do you have a link? Do you?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KingFlorez Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-10-06 09:49 AM
Response to Reply #27
30. Here
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bob3 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-10-06 10:03 AM
Response to Reply #30
33. And again huh?
Weicker doesn't sound very bitter in this story and he's said he's supporting Lamont because of his stand against the war.
Holy Joe tried in that hideous Yogi Bear and boo boo cartoon ad to suggest Lamont is Weicker's creature but nobody's buying that gibberish.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
atreides1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-10-06 10:31 AM
Response to Reply #30
37. Thank you
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
calico1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-10-06 10:33 AM
Response to Reply #30
38. Here is a little more information on
Edited on Mon Jul-10-06 10:39 AM by calico1
Weiker that you might find informative:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lowell_Weicker

<snip>
"Weicker's tense relations with establishment Republicans may have roots in receiving strong support from President Nixon in his 1970 senate bid, support repaid in the eyes of his critics by a vehement attack on the White House on the Watergate Committee. Later, his relations with the Bush family soured, and the brother of then Vice President Bush (Prescott Bush, Jr.) made a short lived bid to gain the 1982 Republican senate nomination. Finally, conservative animus spilled into overt support for Joe Lieberman in 1988, both from national sources such as National Review, but more importantly, from rank and file Connecticut Republicans irate with Weicker's effort to make the local party more liberal and prevent the nomination of conservatives to state office, and the poor showing of Weicker backed candidates in the 1986 elections."

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bob3 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-10-06 09:55 AM
Response to Reply #21
31. Huh? Did some one open a bag full of humming birds?
I feel like I'm watching an episode of non-Sequitor theater - First Holy Joe accusing Lamont of being a republican - and now this bizarre addition. Who might the bitter ex-republican be? And what the heck does ex-republican mean?

It is like the room suddedly filled up with humming birds for no reason.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jsamuel Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-10-06 10:44 AM
Response to Reply #21
40. By that token, Kerry is a closet republican, supported by ex-republican
Max Cleland...

whats your point?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KingFlorez Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-10-06 10:58 AM
Response to Reply #40
45. There is a difference
With Weicker, he's probably still angry Lieberman defeated him. Plus, Lamont's record has him siding with Republicans 80% of the time.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jsamuel Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-10-06 11:37 AM
Response to Reply #45
46. nice "talking points" - we both know that town affairs are highly non-part
Edited on Mon Jul-10-06 11:44 AM by jsamuel
isan

of course he sided with the Republicans 80% of the time. So did the other Democrats.


And Bush must be a closet Democrat because he was supported by Zell Miller.
And Bush's war must be a closet Democrat war becuase it is supported by Lieberman.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
calico1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-10-06 11:54 AM
Response to Reply #46
47. Thank you. Well said.
I am thinking this poster is probably not from CT.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jumpoffdaplanet Donating Member (676 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-10-06 12:03 PM
Response to Reply #45
49. You still haven't answered the question
Why is Lamont bad because Weicker supports him, but it's ok that Hannity, Coulter, and O'Reilly support Lie-berman?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
calico1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-10-06 12:46 PM
Response to Reply #49
54. You would think this poster would be more
concerned that the likes of Hannity, Coulter, Limbaugh, etc. support Lieberman, not to mention that he is the "favorite" Democrat of the Republican party.... more so than the fact that an old time 60's Liberal Republican supports Lamont and that Lamont's votes with Republicans in his town consist of potholes and such, not national policy. Very strange.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KingFlorez Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-10-06 01:21 PM
Response to Reply #49
55. I don't trust a former Republican
Hannity, Coulter and O'Reilly don't really support Lieberman, they are just making it look like they do because they know how liberals are about Lieberman. Coulter is known for saying things just to make liberals irritated.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jumpoffdaplanet Donating Member (676 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-10-06 04:43 PM
Response to Reply #55
60. Sorry, but that's the kind of spin I expect from Fox News
If it's the ex- part that you don't like about Wierker, you better gird your loins.

Repubs across the country are waking up to the fact bushco has destroyed their party and are leaving that party by switching to Dem.

Look at Kansas.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AlinPA Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-10-06 09:29 AM
Response to Original message
16. Sounds like Karl Rove style- is Rove helping him?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
no_hypocrisy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-10-06 09:31 AM
Response to Original message
17. A classic case of Freudian Projection, doctor . . . . n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tierra_y_Libertad Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-10-06 09:32 AM
Response to Original message
19. JoeBunkum is outdoing himself in hypocrisy.
No easy task.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
napi21 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-10-06 09:37 AM
Response to Original message
22. I watched the debate! es he DID say that! I know when I heard
the 90% story, I tried to find Joe's actual voting record. It's sooo easy to distort a senate voting record to show whatever you want to at the time.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Greyhound Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-10-06 09:45 AM
Response to Reply #22
28. And, which votes the 10% came from.
Lieberman is but one of the corporate cabal, and they take turns "voting their conscience" to kill any real progress. That way they can all say "we're good Democrats, and sometimes good people occasionally disagree", and the sheeple go back to chewing their cud.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Marnieworld Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-10-06 09:39 AM
Response to Original message
23. I know you are but what am I?
3 term senator and this is the best he can do? Pee-Wee Herman for Senate!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bdamomma Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-10-06 09:40 AM
Response to Original message
24. desperate joe taking desperate measures
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
greenbriar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-10-06 09:40 AM
Response to Original message
25. projection thy name is Lieberman
it makes me sick when they take something they do and accuse the dems of doing it
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DinahMoeHum Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-10-06 10:36 AM
Response to Original message
39. The only thing possibly "Republican" about Lamont is his family tree
Edited on Mon Jul-10-06 10:37 AM by DinahMoeHum
old-money Wall Street roots and all that;
even here there are glaring exceptions: his grand-uncle Corliss Lamont was a famous secular humanist and writer.

BTW, I purposely use quotation marks around the word "Republican", because here I refer to the old-line, "Rockefeller Repubs" which are now a close-to-extinct species amid all the radicals in the 'Puke Party.

So what if Ned Lamont comes from an old-line moneyed Wall Street family? Big deal, so does Howard Dean (aka Howard Brush Dean III) Both gentlemen tried out Wall Street and decided it wasn't for them; so one became an entrepreneur and another a doctor. Nothing wrong with that.

I love the smell of desperation from Joe Lieberman. It smells like victory...for Lamont.

JOE GOTTA GO.

:kick:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cameron27 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-10-06 10:46 AM
Response to Original message
41. Lieberman suffers from
a rabid case of entitlement and cannot conceive of losing his 18 year Senate seat. I imagine many more dirty tricks, republican style, from this erstwhile democratic senator.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Beelzebud Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-10-06 10:47 AM
Response to Original message
42. Rove tactic. Take your weakness and attack your enemy for it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
calico1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-10-06 10:50 AM
Response to Reply #42
43. He is a slug.
To think I voted for the prick once. There are others who feel just as I do.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Clarkie1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-10-06 11:56 AM
Response to Original message
48. Lamont never answered questions about his political past in the debate
Lieberman several times claimed he had voted Republican in local elections, and had the records to prove. Also, Lamont has refused to release his tax records. And, Lamont never challenged Lieberman's assertion that he voted with Democrats 90% of the time. Lieberman was very effective in the debate, and did make it look like Lamont was distorting his record by acting as if he were Bush. So, I think this will likely be an effective commercial for Lieberman based on what I saw in the debate.

It will be interesting to see if Lamont can mount an effective response. He'll have to do a whole lot better than he did in the debate.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
genieroze Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-10-06 12:17 PM
Response to Original message
50. Pot meet kettle, Lieberman is smoking the pot to come up with this crap.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ladjf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-10-06 12:28 PM
Response to Original message
51. In the past, I would have assumed that this is a joke.But,now
days, anything is possible. Could there be a clearer case of the "pot calling the kettle black"?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NotGivingUp Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-10-06 12:34 PM
Response to Original message
52. Well...Lieberman is proving just how much of a Republican he truly is....
He's doing what Republicans do best...accuse the other guy of what they themselves are guilty of.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sakabatou Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-10-06 12:36 PM
Response to Original message
53. Pot, meet kettle.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
oc2002 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-10-06 03:06 PM
Response to Original message
56. Is that all? I thought LIEberman was going to call him a Vampire. lol.

LIEberman, will do and say anything to stay in power..
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LittleClarkie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-10-06 03:13 PM
Response to Original message
57. WHO is doing his ad campaign?
Because they SUCK.

Are these the same people who thought that stupid bear commecial was a good idea?

Gads, they could win it for Lamont all by their damn selves.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
zulchzulu Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-10-06 03:20 PM
Response to Original message
58. The more Joementum smears Lamont, the worse he's going to do
I never understood WHY Gore chose this guy as VP...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lies and propaganda Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-10-06 03:22 PM
Response to Original message
59. isnt it ironic...
dont ya think?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Marr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-10-06 04:46 PM
Response to Original message
61. And Joe pulls yet another move from the Republican playbook.
Accuse your opponent of what you yourself are doing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
depakid Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-10-06 04:52 PM
Response to Original message
62. Lieberman is lying
and hopefully, the people of Connecticut can see through his tactics.

The man DOES NOT vote with the Dems 90% of the time when the votes are broken down and aggregated on an issue by issue basis.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WCGreen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-10-06 04:53 PM
Response to Original message
63. Lieberman is 64....
Why doesn't he just retire....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 04:03 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC