|
Simply put, they refer to her that way because, according to standard male-corporate-media-speak, "girl=child" and "woman=slut or bitch." As soon as an attack is discovered, the media goes right into "campaign mode," and starts slipping little attacks or innuendo about the victim--why was she at the bar alone anyway? why was she wearing a short-sleeved-shirt at that time of year anyway? this is not the first time she has made an accusation like this; according to the record, she is divorced, etc.--to condition the audience to react against a stereotype, combined with suppression of facts that help the victim, and associating all this with the preconditioned hatred of all things "woman" is easier than to expose themselves for what they are by going the "slut deserved it" route on a dead 14-year-old girl.
This is also part of a larger pattern by the male media of removing the woman's perspective completely from the consideration of the crime, so that it will only be described the way males want it to. The problem isn't male violence or oppression of women and girls--"feminist shit"--no, it is "racism" or "religion," however bizarrely things have to be twisted around to fabricate the presentation, as if it only happens certain places where males are, and not others, etc. It ain't us, it's those "other people"! Why was Christianity thrown into the description here, or "red state," etc., except to take the discussion away from women, and make it something males can use? (Waiting for the next round of "Why Do We Have to Hear About That Dead Bitch Natalie Holloway?" threads...) I rather doubt that these soldiers were good, contemplating Christians, but they probably all loved football, rock and roll and rap, TV, talk radio, and all the other commercial, secular places where women are slammed and humiliated all the time. The worst countries in the world for women, by the way, are Muslim: if a rape victim cannot produce four male witnesses to verify her story, she herself is then arrested for "illicit sexual activity," thrown in jail, (and further rapes by police and guards of the "unclean" woman are common, never any arrests for that ), and cases against the rapists almost never pursued--unless international human rights groups hear about it. Women have almost no rights under Sharia law; it is a Medieval Hell.
The only person I have heard covering this story correctly, with outrage, and with proof of the child's age, is Nancy Grace, (waiting for the next round of "I Hate Nancy Grace" threads...). Over and over again, when a rape is committed, especially with a commercial "celebrity" as attacker, the smirking, viciousness, and accusations start, in the "modern" West, where the only "Bible" the announcers ever read is their stock report. If there is video of the half-naked woman victim being attacked, God help her, because it is going to become money-making entertainment, and it is going to be replayed a thousand times.
When the rape of a victim is gleefully approached as if it were a video game--and when commercial video games feature rape as the "reward" at the end--when every time women try to refer to male oppresion, the eyes start to roll, it is dismissed, (maybe we were "bitch-slapped," like a "bitch" "deserves"), and the whole situation is re-characterized to remove the fact that it is a hate-crime against woman and girls, then no matter what "outrage" there may be expressed, it does not relate at all to the situation; it has become a "useful routine." No matter what else, it is male hatred of us, followed by more male hatred of us, as the system they invented shoves the victim's face in the shit and denies justice, and all the attempts to deny the woman's voice, and convert it to an "anti-American," "anti-Christian," "ethnic" spiel only furthers that injustice.
Raping a "girl" is perversion; raping a "woman" is "understandable"--that is what they are for, and we hate them. The only males who are not guilty are the ones who have noticed this, and admit what the problem is. You have to state it: only feminism will solve these human rights violations; that gets at the real meaning of it.
|