Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Do you guys think that the DNC and Senate Dems really were behind Gore's

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
 
jsamuel Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-17-06 10:23 AM
Original message
Do you guys think that the DNC and Senate Dems really were behind Gore's
speech yesterday?

I think it is possible that they wanted SOMEONE with credibility (like a former VP) to say that stuff out in the open. Current senators are being ignored anyway by the 24 hour media cycle. Also, the RNC has to go after Gore, which they look stupid for going after since he isn't even in the government any more.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
global1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-17-06 10:25 AM
Response to Original message
1. Have Any Dems Come Out And Stood Behind Gore's Speech....
yesterday or today yet? Have any of them said - he is right and we're going to do something about it?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jsamuel Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-17-06 10:29 AM
Response to Reply #1
3. See that is kinda the point, there is like a silent approval. Both DiFi
and Boxer were there from what I heard and who knows who else...

So some of them (even DiFi) were there yet they didn't tell anyone they were there, like Boxer. So, I think it is possible that they could be purposely being quiet about this. Gore sturs up the debate while Senate dems get to look clean going into the hearings into the NSA spying stuff.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Innocent Smith Donating Member (466 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-17-06 11:44 AM
Response to Reply #3
9. I don't think so
Instead of being silent they all need to be reiterating what he was saying. If they don't then the MSM media will ignore it and move on to the next story. That is already happening.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sendero Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-17-06 06:17 PM
Response to Reply #1
11. Kerry just did..
... so that's a start!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
atreides1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-17-06 10:27 AM
Response to Original message
2. No
That kind of backing would take guts that, and while the DNC may possess the courage to back Gore, not many of the Senate Dems do.

And since when has looking stupid stopped the RNC from attacking someone that doesn't agree with them?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leftchick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-17-06 10:30 AM
Response to Original message
4. haven't heard a peep from any of them
supporting Al.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jsamuel Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-17-06 10:31 AM
Original message
EXACTLY my point
see post 3
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leftchick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-17-06 11:12 AM
Response to Original message
7. it is a pretty shitty strategy
if it is one.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
txindy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-17-06 10:31 AM
Response to Original message
5. I don't know about that
Had that been true, I would hope Hillary would've let Gore be the Democrat's voice yesterday. Her timing is terrible. I suppose it could've been worse, though. She could've been on one of her rightward swings and undercut Gore's points. We wouldn't ever have heard the end of that in the M$M.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LiberalEsto Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-17-06 10:33 AM
Response to Original message
6. Diane Feinstein did. She attended the speech.
Meanwhile Congressmen John Conyers, Bobby Scott and my own Rep. Chris Van Hollen will hold their own hearing Friday on the surveillance program.

If the Rethug machine controlling Congress won't permit hearings, thank heavens there are Democrats courageous enough to hold their own hearing on the critical matter.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Chimichurri Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-17-06 11:16 AM
Response to Reply #6
8. She's the wishywashiest of all wishy washy
Her declaration of Alito's confirmation prospects as being sans fillabuster is just plain sad.
Time and time again she shows where her loyalties are. She should allow a true progressive to take her place.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BelgianMadCow Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-17-06 06:14 PM
Response to Original message
10. some questions do get answered
don't they
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 11:46 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC