jsamuel
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Jan-17-06 10:23 AM
Original message |
Do you guys think that the DNC and Senate Dems really were behind Gore's |
|
speech yesterday?
I think it is possible that they wanted SOMEONE with credibility (like a former VP) to say that stuff out in the open. Current senators are being ignored anyway by the 24 hour media cycle. Also, the RNC has to go after Gore, which they look stupid for going after since he isn't even in the government any more.
|
global1
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Jan-17-06 10:25 AM
Response to Original message |
1. Have Any Dems Come Out And Stood Behind Gore's Speech.... |
|
yesterday or today yet? Have any of them said - he is right and we're going to do something about it?
|
jsamuel
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Jan-17-06 10:29 AM
Response to Reply #1 |
3. See that is kinda the point, there is like a silent approval. Both DiFi |
|
and Boxer were there from what I heard and who knows who else...
So some of them (even DiFi) were there yet they didn't tell anyone they were there, like Boxer. So, I think it is possible that they could be purposely being quiet about this. Gore sturs up the debate while Senate dems get to look clean going into the hearings into the NSA spying stuff.
|
Innocent Smith
(466 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Jan-17-06 11:44 AM
Response to Reply #3 |
|
Instead of being silent they all need to be reiterating what he was saying. If they don't then the MSM media will ignore it and move on to the next story. That is already happening.
|
sendero
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Jan-17-06 06:17 PM
Response to Reply #1 |
atreides1
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Jan-17-06 10:27 AM
Response to Original message |
|
That kind of backing would take guts that, and while the DNC may possess the courage to back Gore, not many of the Senate Dems do.
And since when has looking stupid stopped the RNC from attacking someone that doesn't agree with them?
|
leftchick
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Jan-17-06 10:30 AM
Response to Original message |
4. haven't heard a peep from any of them |
jsamuel
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Jan-17-06 10:31 AM
Original message |
leftchick
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Jan-17-06 11:12 AM
Response to Original message |
7. it is a pretty shitty strategy |
txindy
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Jan-17-06 10:31 AM
Response to Original message |
5. I don't know about that |
|
Had that been true, I would hope Hillary would've let Gore be the Democrat's voice yesterday. Her timing is terrible. I suppose it could've been worse, though. She could've been on one of her rightward swings and undercut Gore's points. We wouldn't ever have heard the end of that in the M$M.
|
LiberalEsto
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Jan-17-06 10:33 AM
Response to Original message |
6. Diane Feinstein did. She attended the speech. |
|
Meanwhile Congressmen John Conyers, Bobby Scott and my own Rep. Chris Van Hollen will hold their own hearing Friday on the surveillance program.
If the Rethug machine controlling Congress won't permit hearings, thank heavens there are Democrats courageous enough to hold their own hearing on the critical matter.
|
Chimichurri
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Jan-17-06 11:16 AM
Response to Reply #6 |
8. She's the wishywashiest of all wishy washy |
|
Her declaration of Alito's confirmation prospects as being sans fillabuster is just plain sad. Time and time again she shows where her loyalties are. She should allow a true progressive to take her place.
|
BelgianMadCow
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Jan-17-06 06:14 PM
Response to Original message |
10. some questions do get answered |
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Thu Apr 25th 2024, 11:46 AM
Response to Original message |