Wilson & Plame sue Cheney, Libby and Rove w/details

[Vyan]

Coming directly on the heels of Robert Novak's tell-all column on the plame affair, Joe Wilson and Valerie Plame have filed a The lawsuit against Vice President Dick Cheney, his former Chief of staff Lewis "Scooter" Libby and White House Deputy Chief of Staff Karl Rove.

From the latest release:

Former CIA agent Valerie Plame Wilson and her husband, former Ambassador Joseph Wilson, filed suit in federal court today against Vice President Dick Cheney, his former Chief of Staff I. Lewis "Scooter" Libby, top Presidential advisor Karl Rove and other unnamed senior White House officials, for their role in the public disclosure of Valerie Wilson's classified CIA status.

The suit accuses the defendants of violating the Wilsons' constitutional and other legal rights as a result of "a conspiracy among current and former high-level officials in the White House" to "discredit, punish and seek revenge against" Mr. Wilson for publicly disputing statements made by President Bush in his 2003 State of the Union address justifying the war in Iraq.

The suit was filed nearly three years after Washington columnist Robert Novak disclosed Valerie Wilson's classified CIA employment in a column he wrote on July 14, 2003, based on leaks from senior administration officials. It subsequently was confirmed, during Special Counsel Patrick Fitzgerald's criminal investigation, that several top ranking officials in the White House leaked Wilson's name and status with the CIA to Novak and other reporters.

The Complaint was filed in the United States District Court for the District of Columbia by the international law firm of Proskauer Rose LLP, whose team is headed by Washington, D.C. litigation partner and privacy law practitioner Christopher Wolf. Noted Constitutional law scholar Erwin Chemerinsky, a professor of law at Duke University, is of counsel in the case.

As a result of Cheney, Libby and Rove's conduct, the suit claims that the Wilsons have suffered violations of their rights guaranteed under the United States Constitution and by laws of the District of Columbia.

Excerpts From the Complaint in Wilson v. Libby, et al.:

"The lawsuit concerns the intentional and malicious exposure by senior officials of the federal government of one such human source at the CIA, Valerie Plame Wilson, whose job it was to gather intelligence to make the nation safer, and who risked her life for her country."

"The Defendants reached an agreement to discredit, punish, and seek revenge against the Plaintiffs . . . . Said agreement was motivated by an invidiously discriminatory animus towards those who had publicly criticized the administration's stated justifications for going to war with Iraq."

"The Defendants chose not to address publicly, directly, and on the merits why they may have thought Mr. Wilson was wrong or unfair in his statements on the President's misstatements. Rather, they embarked on an anonymous 'whispering campaign' designed to discredit and injure the Plaintiffs and to deter other critics from publicly speaking out."

"But for Mr. Wilson coming forward, it is unlikely that the Administration ever would have acknowledged its error. The fact that the administration had to admit its mistake is one likely reason why the Defendants chose to attack the Wilsons"

"The Defendants fraudulently concealed the existence of the Plaintiffs' cause of action . . . by, among other things, giving false or misleading testimony to federal law enforcement personnel and/or the federal grand jury empanelled to investigate the unlawful publication of Plaintiff Valerie Plame Wilson's classified CIA employment. . . ."

SusanHu has a statement by Ambassador Wilson to Robert Novak up on Dkos with additional comments by former CIA Operative Larry Johnson.

Wilson:

Robert Novak: Justifying the Unjustifiable

"Robert Novak, some other commentators and the Administration continue to try to completely distort the role that Valerie Wilson played with respect to Ambassador Wilson's trip to Niger. The facts are beyond dispute. The Office of the Vice President requested that the CIA investigate reports of alleged uranium purchases by Iraq from Niger."

"The CIA set up a meeting to respond to the Vice President's inquiry. Another CIA official, not Valerie Wilson, suggested to Valerie Wilson's supervisor that the Ambassador attend that meeting. That other CIA official made the recommendation because that official was familiar with the Ambassador's vast experience in Niger and knew of a previous trip to Africa concerning uranium matters that had been undertaken by the Ambassador on behalf of the CIA in 1999.

"Valerie Wilson's supervisor subsequently asked her to relay a request from him to the Ambassador that he would like the Ambassador to attend the meeting at the CIA. Valerie Wilson did not participate in the meeting."

-- Ambassador Joseph Wilson

SusanG has more of this statement Frontpaged on Kos.

Johnson:

First, Robert Novak has been repeating the nonsense that he learned Valerie was undercover because he looked her up in Who's Who. Excuse me? If you looked up Valerie in Who's Who back in July 2001 it said nothing, I repeat NOTHING, about her working for the CIA. The only way Novak knew that she worked at the CIA was because Karl Rove told him.

Bill Harlow, the CIA's spokesman said more than he should to Novak but at least he warned Novak not to print anything about her identity.

Second, more than 10 former intelligence officers (myself included), identified by name, have stated that Valerie was undercover when she was outed. Those are cold, hard facts.

For additional information, here is a link to The Joseph and Valerie Wilson Legal Support Trust, which has copies of the press release and the formal complaint filed, all in one place.

Crossposted on Truth 2 Power

Vyan

[MissWaverly]

1. I am ashamed of our Congress

Congress, I would like to go on record as saying that I am ashamed of you, you kept the fire
stoked on the Paula Jones case, you were in full cry to show that the president was not above the law until one of your own gets elected to the Oval Office. As a result of this leak, people
were exposed as covert agents, people were tortured and died due to the outing of Valerie Plame.
Where is Justice, why didn't you demand full accountability for this like you did for Clinton's
actions. You are silent, but history will not condone your dirty deeds.

[mother earth]

2. I second that, Miss Waverly....it's completely shameful.

[MissWaverly]

4. Thanks, I remember reading about Ashcroft leaving

the FBI reported to him that there was a mountain of evidence on the Plame outing, now we
have 1 indictment and maybe a trial and Bush announces the investigation is over, what a joke.

[TheDebbieDee]

6. "kept the fire stoked on the Paula Jones case".........

Don't forget, that was a repuke congress against a Democratic president with lots of help from a complicit MSM!

[MissWaverly]

7. so, what difference does the fact Clinton was a democrat make

they said this was about the rule of law and not setting the president above the law, they never said this is hack politics

[TheDebbieDee]

8. The difference is...........

that the repukes/neocons had enough power to use congress and the MSM to persecute a Democratic president and his administration.

The Democrats are now underdogs and have been for several years. They will not be able to lend real support to the Wilsons in their quest to punish * admin for selling out the country and the CIA.

[MissWaverly]

9. yes but this is supposed to be about laws not politics

that's what Watergate was all about, the illegal break in of the DNC headquarters

[Humor_In_Cuneiform]

3. Yay!! I hope for their success and safety.

[displacedtexan]

5. Thanks for posting this, Vyan.

I just donated to the Wilsons' legal trust fund.