Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Wonder why there wasn't more social unrest during the Great Depression?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
 
raccoon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-13-06 04:40 PM
Original message
Wonder why there wasn't more social unrest during the Great Depression?

I know there was some, but it seems like there would have been a lot more.

Maybe there was a lot and the media just didn't cover it? It was hushed up?

And of course communications in those days were relatively primitive.

I read once, wish I could remember the source:

"The Great Depression left a lot of people disillusioned. Another depression will leave America's cities in ashes."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
originalpckelly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-13-06 04:42 PM
Response to Original message
1. You have NO idea.
Really. Honestly.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
raccoon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-13-06 04:50 PM
Response to Reply #1
7. Maybe you didn't intend it, but your post comes across as
arrogant.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HiFructosePronSyrup Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-13-06 04:44 PM
Response to Original message
2. My dad was a Wobblie.
I never knew him without the limp he had from when a cop busted his knee during a strike.

There was a lot of social unrest during and prior to the Great Depression. It's a very important part of history, IMHO. A lot of it's been ignored and shut up though, due to the powers that be.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
raccoon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-13-06 04:47 PM
Response to Reply #2
4. Gosh, I'm sorry that happened to him. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Joe for Clark Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-13-06 04:47 PM
Response to Original message
3. It got pretty bad, there.
You're right about the communications being poor.

I really think the times were defined by the bonus marchers - when Mcarther open fire on our WWI vets asking for their promised bonuses - and burned their tent cities. Shame on him.

They just didn't have TV (or the internet). They fired on OUR vets, you know???

Joe
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pooja Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-13-06 04:47 PM
Response to Original message
5. There are a couple of reasons...
1. No internet
2. There were more people able to "live off the land"... my grandmother was in the country.. They grew vegetables, canned things for the winter, used maple sugar as a sugar substitution (Vermont I remind you). They had less expectations, so they didn't mind a little less. Could you imagine telling your child there is no t.v., no internet, you only get a couple of play clothes (something usually a little snug), 1 suday outfit, and 2 outfits for school. It was a different time. I don't even think my granmother had indoor plumbing when she was a little girl.. I know she still has a couple of bed pans hanging around the old house.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JuniperLea Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-13-06 05:23 PM
Response to Reply #5
19. I heard a lot of those stories when I was a kid begging for some toy
They made their underwear out of flour sacks, made lye soap from beef tallow and ashes, put cardboard inside shoes to cover holes and only wore shoes when absolutely necessary to conserve shoe leather, hems on pants and dresses went up and down over the years so three or four different kids could use them... the way my grandma described it, their household of 16+ made the Waltons look like the Rockefellers...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dr.Phool Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-13-06 04:50 PM
Response to Original message
6. History books tend to ignore it.
I remember that the '20s and '30s was an era of a lot of social unrest, strikes, unionizing, and widespread socialist thought. Then it just seemed to disappear.

After reading Howard Zinn's "A Peoples History of the United States, 1492-Present". I found out that all the radicals and union orgaizers were handd 50-60 year prison sentences, on trumped up and false charges.

Great book. Explains a lot, in great fetail.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
raccoon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-13-06 04:52 PM
Response to Reply #6
8. Jeez louise--50-60 years........
I've got to read that book.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Howardx Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-13-06 05:08 PM
Response to Reply #6
15. yep great book
all kinds of stuff you werent taught in school
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ngant17 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-13-06 05:29 PM
Response to Reply #15
22. Zinn's "People's History of US" should be standard textbook in school
I keep his history book on my shelf as a reference when I need it. If you like audio, there's a 6-vol. CD, "The People's History Project, Vol. I", which is something like a complement to his book. It's a little more pricey, at $45, so I haven't bought it yet myself. akpress.org has all of the other Zinn books, DVDs and CDs if you can't find them anywhere else.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Just Me Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-13-06 04:54 PM
Response to Original message
9. There was a LOT of social unrest: violence, crime, union-busting,....
,...suicides, suffering, so much suffering. History books rarely touch the parts and pieces of humanity associated with events over time.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MadHound Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-13-06 04:57 PM
Response to Original message
10. Actually there was a LOT of social unrest in the US
The thing is that a great deal of it has been glossed over by history. It wasn't all a matter of bread lines and New Deal projects, there were a lot of bitter people out there, pissed and not caring what became of themselves. Riots were common, brutal strikes, the emergence of political movements and themes that reverberate to this day. For instance, do you know that the Socialist Party became such a threat to FDR that he felt he had to steal a couple of their party planks in order to win re-election. Those two planks? Unemployment Insurance and Old Age Insurance(better known as Social Security).

There was much questioning of the status quo, and questioning of capitalism during the Great Depression. In fact in many ways it was a nadir of leftist politics that would never be reached until thirty years later in the late sixties.

But sadly, most of that has been wiped from the history books. You can hear it in the echoes of Woody Guthrie, or read about it in obscure history books. But for the most part, what we're taught about the Great Depression is glossed over pabulum, a Waltonized version where everybody has enough to eat, a place to sleep, and nobody, but nobody is ever pissed off enough to take to the streets.

Sad, because there is so much that we should, could have learned from that time period.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Double T Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-13-06 04:57 PM
Response to Original message
11. Fear, Fear, and More Fear.......
what do you think the Halliburton detention camps are going to be used for?????
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
roamer65 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-13-06 04:58 PM
Response to Original message
12. FDR
Franklin Delano Roosevelt. He was the right man for the right time. If Hoover had been put back into office, the country would have fallen apart.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Joe for Clark Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-13-06 05:04 PM
Response to Reply #12
14. It was the day Hoover ordered MCarther to fire on our vets,
That was the day, reportedly, FDR knew he won.

And he did.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
benddem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-13-06 05:47 PM
Response to Reply #14
25. there is a film
being made for PBS on the Bonus Army. It will air on Veteran's day.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Joe for Clark Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-13-06 06:03 PM
Response to Reply #25
27. Thanks. I am looking forward to it.
Joe

11/11/06 - the eleventh hour of the eleventh day of the eleventh month -
I always thought that was a great day to end a war. I guess any day is a good day to end war, too.

Thanks,

Joe
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
raccoon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-14-06 07:50 AM
Response to Reply #14
45. Hoover should've been tried for that. Or impeached.

But the power elite would never have let that happen.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FloridaPat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-13-06 05:00 PM
Response to Original message
13. It was left out of the history books. You can't have little patriotic
robots running around if they read stories about the common people fighting the big bad got't wolf. I took a tour of a national park in GA that talked about all the peace marches they had during the Civil War. I was impressed. Thought that was a new thing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Joe for Clark Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-13-06 05:17 PM
Response to Reply #13
18. Personally, I didn't know they did that in Georgia.
I am now impressed with Georgia. I can almost forgive the Braves for beating the Pirates in the 90s - almost.

In fact, I am impressed that you knew there were peace marches during the civil war, at all.

There were marches, north and south. Alot of people didn't think much of war for settling anything, even then.

Good for Georgia!! Gov Joe Brown - I thought he just wanted out of the war (Civil War) for monetary reasons - maybe not.

Anyway, good for the National Parks Services for speaking truth to power.

Thanks, ForidaPat

Joe
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FloridaPat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-13-06 06:45 PM
Response to Reply #18
30. Actually they were talking about the peace marches in the northern
cities. NYC and Chicago. But the park is in Georgia. I can't remember the name of it now, but when I lived in Tennessee I went there often. It was a big battle during the Civil War.

But Georgia is a neat state. I lived in Atlanta for 6 months and loved it. They have so many flowers in the spring time, my car turned yellow with the pollen. The people are real nice too.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Joe for Clark Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-13-06 07:12 PM
Response to Reply #30
35. Hi Florida Pat -
You mean Chickamogua. I doubt I spelled that right.

It was on the line of the rebel retreat after Chatanooga.

I want to go there one day. I do also want to see Shiloh, one day.

I think the people are very nice down south, my experience goes to only Richmond, however.

I am surprised park rangers talked openly about the "peacenicks" north and south that were around then, I really am.

They sure didn't do that around Richmond, I can tell you that!!

Anyway, I am glad you know.

Joe
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FloridaPat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-14-06 06:31 AM
Response to Reply #35
44. That's the place! Thanks. They have a program in the visitor
center and the peace marches are actually in the program for everyone to learn about. THe first time I went they were have a Civil War re-enactment. They are really neat to see. The people talk about what it was like for the soldiers in those days. The uniforms were made of wool. Warm in the winter and cool in the summer! All sorts of neat things. What a waste of people though. So many dead.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bobbieinok Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-13-06 05:13 PM
Response to Original message
16. similar to many people not wanting to take welfare when it came on-line??
Edited on Thu Jul-13-06 05:14 PM by bobbieinok
I've read that a lot of people thought if they needed outside help that meant they were 'bad people' so even if it meant the children might be hungry they found it very difficult to accept help.

ALSO, there was a much lower level of expectation of what was necessary to live. In the 70s my Am Assn of Univ Women group had an ongoing discussion about the Great Depression and what would happen if there were another; most thought another Great Depression would lead to horrendous riots, etc, b/c society and the level of expectation is so much different now.

ALSO, I've found 'hidden' history of the depression era in stories/histories of tramps and 'riding the rails.' One suggestion there was that older children left home so that younger ones would have more. BTW, that's the family story about my grandfather who came to US from Switzerland in the late 1800s; it's said that he and a cousin left home so that the younger children would have more. (That was before tourism became a major industry in Switzerland. As I understand it, most families lived on subsistence-level farming.)

BTW, did you ever check out the strong socialist influence in IA and OK (and probably other very surprising places) from ca 1900 to 1930s??? I think at least one small IA town had a socialist mayor.

edited for punctuation
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DeBunk Donating Member (435 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-13-06 05:13 PM
Response to Original message
17. There was a great deal. It was reported, just not remembered
I did a paper in College about it.

There was a lot. There were riots, boycotts, arrests. The whole nine. At the time the socialist party in the US was at it's high point.

Here some info:

http://www.lib.umich.edu/spec-coll/radicaldepression/topic_index_organizations.html

Here's something from the library of congress:

Blaming Wall Street speculators, bankers, and the Hoover administration, the rumblings of discontent grew mightily in the early 1930s. By 1932, hunger marches and small riots were common throughout the nation.

However, not all citizens were caught up in the social eruptions. Many were too downtrodden or busy surviving day to day to get involved in public displays of discontent.

http://memory.loc.gov/learn/features/timeline/depwwii/depress/depress.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Joe for Clark Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-13-06 05:29 PM
Response to Reply #17
23. Those are great links DeBunk.
Joe
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Velveteen Ocelot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-13-06 05:24 PM
Response to Original message
20. There was a very considerable amount of social unrest here
and elsewhere (the Depression wasn't limited to the U.S.). Socialism and Communism were becoming more popular precisely because so many people were so poor and powerless -- and some historians have posited that Roosevelt's New Deal actually saved capitalism because those welfare programs prevented "the masses" from trying to overthrow the government.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Terran1212 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-13-06 05:25 PM
Response to Original message
21. Read Howard Zinn's A People's History of the United States
Unlike establishment media, he actually goes out of his way to show the resistance of normal folks to things like the Depression, which was vast.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Vidar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-13-06 05:45 PM
Response to Original message
24. Macarthur's use of tanks on the bonus army got a lof of press.
Edited on Thu Jul-13-06 05:45 PM by Vidar
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Joe for Clark Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-13-06 06:12 PM
Response to Reply #24
28. I wonder how many people could answer such a
question correctly. You say bonus - I bet you get Wheel of fortune as the related category.

Sad.

Thanks for spelling Macarthur right for me - I kept missing the a (for asshole) Macarthur -

We don't think too highly of him in my family, I guess.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pitohui Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-13-06 05:51 PM
Response to Original message
26. because starving people don't have time for that
if you have ever been hungry, you quickly learn what a number it does on your energy

ill and hungry, fuggedaboutit
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pretzel4gore Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-13-06 06:17 PM
Response to Original message
29. gotta mention Huey Long...
Huey was the govner of Louisiana, and he improved the lot of the poor, including the black people, of his state, by insisting that the oil co's pay decent royalties on their earnings, sorta like Hugo Chavez (:))...history, or is it hushtory, has effectively buried Huey Long, along with much of the truth about the great depression....Huey said, in the roaring 20's era, that $1 million was tops for anyone's private wealth, and not a cent more! And! Ever since, the system has quietly shut down any info about Huey Long (and i notice there are no lack of DU'ers to accuse him of being corrupt) beyond the same sorta crap Chavez (or Clinton/Gore/Kerry)) were accused of...Huey was murdered in 1935, at height of depression (he probably win the '36 presidential election, which he planned to contest with Roosevelt)...anyone who cannot see that Huey Long was a HERO....well, there's another bush getting lined up for WH, so maybe someday they'll learn(?)
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Huey_Long
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Joe for Clark Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-13-06 06:51 PM
Response to Reply #29
31. Huey Long was a good man - I'd never put him in the same
sentence as Chavez, though.

I am absolutely certain too, if FDR did not not prvail in 1936 - you'd be saying that in German now. However much a polulist Long was - he in no way had the foresight to take on Germany - and FDR did. Thank God FDR won.

There was talk at that time he was going to challenge FDR- I don't think he could have won. AND I AM SURE GLAD HE DIDN'T.

Sure you are too.

Joe
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tierra_y_Libertad Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-13-06 07:24 PM
Response to Reply #29
37. Huey was interviewed by Roy Wilkins.
Roy Wilkins interviewed Huey P. Long for The Crisis in February, 1935.

"How about lynching. Senator? About the Costigan-Wagner bill in congress and that lynching down there yesterday in Franklinton..."

He ducked the Costigan-Wagner bill, but of course, everyone knows he is against it. He cut me off on the Franklinton lynching and hastened in with his "pat" explanation:

"You mean down in Washington parish (county)? Oh, that? That one slipped up on us. Too bad, but those slips will happen. You know while I was governor there were no lynchings and since this man (Governor Allen) has been in he hasn't had any. (There have been 7 lynchings in Louisiana in the last two years.) This one slipped up. I can't do nothing about it. No sir. Can't do the dead nigra no good. Why, if I tried to go after those lynchers it might cause a hundred more niggers to be killed. You wouldn't want that, would you?"

"But you control Louisiana," I persisted, "you could..."

"Yeah, but it's not that simple. I told you there are some things even Huey Long can't get away with. We'll just have to watch out for the next one. Anyway that nigger was guilty of coldblooded murder."

"But your own supreme court had just granted him a new trial."

"Sure we got a law which allows a reversal on technical points. This nigger got hold of a smart lawyer somewhere and proved a technicality. He was guilty as hell. But we'll catch the next lynching."

My guess is that Huey is a hard, ambitious, practical politician. He is far shrewder than he is given credit for being. My further guess is that he wouldn't hesitate to throw Negroes to the wolves if it became necessary; neither would he hesitate to carry them along if the good they did him was greater than the harm. He will walk a tight rope and go along as far as he can. He told New York newspapermen he welcomed Negroes in the share-the-wealth clubs in the North where they could vote, but down South? Down South they can't vote: they are no good to him. So he lets them strictly alone. After all, Huey comes first.

Anyway, menace or benefactor, he is the most colorful character I have interviewed in the twelve years I've been in the business.



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tierra_y_Libertad Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-13-06 06:57 PM
Response to Original message
32. The country was really near a revolution/civil war.
My father and his brother both cussed FDR for stopping the revolution that they were working for as union organizers during the depression. He co-opted, and watered down, the left-wing agenda enough to save the country from what could have been a very messy revolution/civil war. As it was, there was plenty of bloodshed and violence in those days. My father carried around a part of a knife blade that a scab broke off in his head.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PassingFair Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-13-06 07:03 PM
Response to Original message
33. My Hero, Eugene Debs...
"On June 16, 1918 Debs made an anti-war speech in Canton, Ohio, protesting World War I, and was arrested under the Espionage Act of 1917. He was convicted, sentenced to serve twenty years in prison and disenfranchised for life.

Debs made his best-remembered statement at his sentencing hearing:

Your Honor, years ago I recognized my kinship with all living beings, and I made up my mind that I was not one bit better than the meanest on earth. I said then, and I say now, that while there is a lower class, I am in it, and while there is a criminal element I am of it, and while there is a soul in prison, I am not free."

They RUINED his HEALTH and his LIFE for a SPEECH!

From Wikipedia.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Eugene_V._Debs

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PeaceProgProsp Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-13-06 07:08 PM
Response to Original message
34. Because Roosevelt cared about working people.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Joe for Clark Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-13-06 07:23 PM
Response to Reply #34
36. This country has a greater debt due him then any other
president, (except maybe G Washinton).

And the truth is - if there was an election today between FDR, Washington and say Lincoln??

I vote FDR hands down.

There was a great dark age coming and he is responsible for saving us from our worst instincts as a world.

He really did care about us normal people - he really did.

Joe
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
treestar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-13-06 07:28 PM
Response to Original message
38. Because people are basically good and will put up with an amazing
and incredible amount of crap before they start hurting other people.

The Soviets and the Chinese had Revolutions. But maybe in the US people believed the system would not fail them.

In the long run, maybe it didn't.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CanSocDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-13-06 07:52 PM
Response to Original message
39. Has Woody Guthrie been forgotten??


Just last week I saw that movie of his life with David Carradine as Woody. In Saskatchewan we had a similar violent over-reaction by the mounties on a group of unemployed marchers from across the country.

http://us.geocities.com/emithsilas/depressionhistory.html

Hunger March of 1932

On March 3rd of 1932 4,000 unemployed workers, squatters, and hobos marched through the city to protest the policy of cutting single men off relief if they refused to go to work camps. City council declined to meet with them and police on foot and horseback charged the group with clubs. The marchers used their flag and banner poles as lances, fighting back and defending themselves, sending 2 police officers to the hospital.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bridget Burke Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-14-06 08:21 AM
Response to Reply #39
48. Woody is the subject of a PBS "American Masters" program.
It just aired in Houston, but I'm hoping for reruns. And the DVD will eventually go on sale. Lots of info here:

www.pbs.org/wnet/americanmasters/database/guthrie_w.html




Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RamboLiberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-13-06 07:55 PM
Response to Original message
40. There was quite a bit of social activism, Communist party
was quite well organized in US. Labor strife was rampant. Etc. As other mentioned much of it doesn't appear in the history books or documentaries. And I think FDR made a helluva lot of brilliant moves and his fireside chats to control the situation. Imagine if we had idiot boy in charge during that time!

Another story I don't think is well-covered is the opposition for the U.S. from many people and pols - especially Repubs - to getting involved in WWII. I hate the way the wingnuts now do revisionist history and never mention it was the conservatives and Repukes who didn't want to fight Hitler and even supported him. They act as if the people of their ilk would've marched right off to fight Hitler.

Thom Hartmann recommends this book which is eye-opening. The Illustrious Dunderheads by Rex Stout. Has lot of the floor speeeches quotes from lawmakers - mostly Repub - arguing against American intervention in WWII.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Joe for Clark Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-13-06 08:33 PM
Response to Reply #40
42. Good post Rambo -
Sure seems to me there weren't too many rebublican officers in WWII - very few.

Sure not in combat.

Guess they were waiting for the second coming of Christ, or something, cause they sure weren't fighting.

You know where a republican fighter pilot went after the bulge?? - -AWOL -
Cause the the FDR pilots would have kicked the snot out of him - and that is a fact.

And some did get the snot kicked out them, I understand.

Anyway, good post.

Joe
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bridget Burke Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-14-06 08:16 AM
Response to Reply #40
47. The "Communist" link caused much of this history to be suppressed.
The US Communists had little idea of what Stalin was really up to. And many who were not party members were "contaminated" by attending the occasional meeting or working on a common cause. Even being a "premature anti-Nazi" was considered a crime during the witch-hunting days of the late 40's & 50's.



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-13-06 07:57 PM
Response to Original message
41. They were too
faint from hunger?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leesa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-13-06 10:21 PM
Response to Original message
43. Many were accustomed to being poor. My Dad had 9 siblings and both
his parents died within two years of each other at the start of the Great Depression. The youngest child was one and the oldest 18. They lived on a dirt "farm" in Minnesota. They took care of each other after his parents died. He remembers porridge 3 times a day and eating road tar in summer to ease the hunger pains. When he was drafted into WWII he thought K rations were heavenly.

People were poor BEFORE the depression.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
raccoon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-14-06 08:04 AM
Response to Reply #43
46. Yes, a lot of people were. My mother's family were a lot like that.

Six kids, a very small farm, and they were dirt poor before the Depression.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 02:46 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC