Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Rumsfeld Confronted By Soldier Over Equipment Shortages In Iraq

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
 
kpete Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-13-06 04:47 PM
Original message
Rumsfeld Confronted By Soldier Over Equipment Shortages In Iraq
Rumsfeld Confronted By Soldier Over Equipment Shortages In Iraq

Improvized Explosive Devices (IEDs) are responsible for “nearly half the casualties of our troops in Iraq.” Among the best defenses against IEDs is a massive heavily-armored vehicle called the Buffalo, which has “become the favorite of U.S. Army combat engineer teams.”

Yesterday, during a surprise trip to Iraq, Defense Secretary Rumsfeld was confronted by a U.S. Army corporal who said the Buffalo he was using was “one of oldest pieces of equipment in the country,” and that just two weeks before, he’d seen a brand new Buffalo in New York City. Rumsfeld defended the Pentagon’s anti-IED efforts and deflected the specific question with a joke.

TRANSCRIPT:

CORPORAL ARTHUR KING: Right now we have one of the oldest pieces of equipment in the country. It’s called a Buffalo and ours is the oldest. And the other day, two weeks ago, we saw a brand-new one in downtown New York City and we’ve been waiting for three months for ours. We are just wondering why that was.

RUMSFELD: Well, I don’t know about New York City. They obviously have a separate budget and they buy what they buy. We’ve got $3.6 billion that dwarfs anything that New York City does just for I.E.D. work and General Monty Miggs has been brought back and he is in the process — he has been in the Army for two and a half, three years, he has been working their heads off as the nature of the I.E.D. problem has migrated and evolved they have put enormous effort on it. I can’t answer why your particular unit ends up with one of the oldest pieces of equipment, but I’ll bet you General Casey can.

Video at:
http://thinkprogress.org/2006/07/13/rumsfeld-ieds/
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Roland99 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-13-06 04:51 PM
Response to Original message
1. Where'd that $87 billion go, Rumsfailed?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Monkeyman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-13-06 04:54 PM
Response to Reply #1
4. Same Place the 26 billion went opps signing statement again
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pooja Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-13-06 04:52 PM
Response to Original message
2. Ok who is running the war and is General Casey our
Commander in Chief?????????
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cliss Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-13-06 05:32 PM
Response to Reply #2
12. You caught that too?
This is typical Rumsfailed. He ALWAYS, ALWAYS finds someone else to blame.

I've gone through his speeches, read through his stupid asinine senate hearings. He NEVER FAILS to shift the blame on to someone else. It's amazing! How can this old goat still be the Secretary of Defense????

When you read the stuff (and you don't have to torture yourself like I did) just 2 or 3 sentences will prove it.

He never takes responsibility for anything. He's just an old fool.:smoke:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
annabanana Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-13-06 04:53 PM
Response to Original message
3. "I’ll bet you General Casey can"
chuckle, chuckle, chuckle

Golly Mr. Rumsfeld, You're such a card.. Hyuck Hyuck

I think that soldier deserved an answer. And a vehicle.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Master Mahon Donating Member (621 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-13-06 05:02 PM
Response to Original message
5. You fight a war with what you got
and with this administration, that's a LOT OF NOTHING!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Wielding Truth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-13-06 05:50 PM
Response to Reply #5
16. I remember that response from Rumsfailed and it makes me want to
scream. He should be in jail or at least fired. What an arrogant heartless idiot!.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madeline_con Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-13-06 05:07 PM
Response to Original message
6. This must have been just before...
Rummy looked at his watch. :puke:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
niyad Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-13-06 05:11 PM
Response to Original message
7. I wonder when this brave soldier will end up in the stockade?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gratuitous Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-13-06 05:11 PM
Response to Original message
8. New York City has a separate budget . . . yeah-h-h-h-h
What, are you pleading poverty, Mr. Rumsfeld? I mean, sure, what with inflation and all, $10 billion a month just doesn't buy what it used to, but come on! Surely our star-spangled, freckle-faced boys in the field can be outfitted at least the equal of an urban police force, no?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gademocrat7 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-13-06 05:13 PM
Response to Original message
9. I saw the exchange on KO last night.
rumsfeld is an incompetent evil man. He cares nothing for our troops. He only cares about how much money he can make off this debacle.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jean Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-13-06 05:16 PM
Response to Original message
10. using the phrase "working their heads" is really disgusting considering
the context of the question AND Rumsfeld's use if it referring to I.E.D. 'work.'
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Oreo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-13-06 05:27 PM
Response to Original message
11. I thought the Buffalo in NYC was just a show for the Army
Does anybody know for sure that it's owned by NYC? I figured it was the Army's equipment.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sal Minella Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-13-06 05:34 PM
Response to Reply #11
13. Betcha it's used to recruit high school kids, showing what they'll be
driving around in when they get to Iraq......
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kohodog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-13-06 05:37 PM
Response to Reply #11
14. It's the newest fad...Hummers are so 20th Century
Probably owned by a 30-something hedge fund manager! Coming soon to a suburb new you.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Recursion Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-13-06 07:03 PM
Response to Reply #14
17. Civilian Hummers should not have been called that
They may share superficial parts of the chassis, but the civilian model is simply not an HMMWV.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Monkeyman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-13-06 05:40 PM
Response to Original message
15. You know that soldiers right
The new humvees and others will not be sent until 2008
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 06:48 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC