Why are we so damn willing to put them right back into control?
An old post I'm recycling. Seemed appropriate given news of a Hillary 08 run leaking:
Here Is One Of My Problems With Both Hillary Clinton And George BushI am tired of American's adopting rich powerful families and voting members of them into (and out of for that matter) office in large part based on other family baggage. What someone's father, mother, brother, wife, or cousin did in office is not a reliable indicator of how they will behave. If Bush I and II do not prove that, nothing will.
I find that the American obsession with celebrity enters the arena of politics here. Not in the Ronny and Aaaahhnoold sense (a topic for another day). But, in the sense that Americans think that they KNOW people that they have seen on TV. They think that they know the relatives of politicians they have seen on TV. Like they have some special insight into them as a person. That gives them a willingness to trust them more than they would otherwise (again see Bush I and II).
That is worrisome as we all know that politicians have carefully crafted public personas. None of us know anyone from television. We should cut out the identifying so strongly with names and familiar faces.
I also object to the collection of so very much power in the hands of such a select few. It is exclusionary to the little guy. It rigs the game in advance. It is fundamentally unsound for the public at large. There is too much temptation to abuse.
We fought a war to free ourselves from aristocrats running the show. But it seems generations later we are more and more willing to return the power to them. We should as they say, "clean house and get some new blood"!
Check me on this if you would. Are there ANY real benefits to an arrangement like we have seen for the past seveeral election cycles? Should we really continue down this road?