Flight 800 Independent Researchers Organization (FIRO) was formed in 1999 by a group of citizens concerned with the course of the official investigation into the crash of TWA Flight 800. During the investigation, the FBI unlawfully denied the National Transportation Safety Board (NTSB) access to forensic results and eyewitness interview documents. FIRO has submitted a petition to the NTSB that requests the reconsideration of their final report, which blames the crash on an electrical spark inside a fuel tank.
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE
July 17, 2006
CNN Presents TWA Flight 800 Misinformation
The recent CNN Presents show 'No Survivors' presented controversial government information on the crash of TWA Flight 800 with inadequate fact checking.
The piece showed an animation of Flight 800 climbing sharply after exploding, in direct conflict with radar data from the crash. Multiple radar sites refute the climb and indicate that the jetliner immediately descended after exploding.
Such a climb was first used in a CIA-produced animation to explain witnesses accounts describing a missile rising off the ocean and colliding with Flight 800. The climbing aircraft “may have looked like a missile attacking an aircraft,” according to the CIA.
In 1999, Flight 800 Independent Researchers Organization released their analysis of the radar evidence. “We simply took the government's own radar and time positions of Flight 800 and calculated the plane's speed,” said FIRO Chairman Tom Stalcup. “The speed increased, which can't happen while climbing sharply.”
According to the law of conservation of energy, Flight 800 had to reduce its speed if it climbed sharply. And all government simulations show such a slow-down, directly conflicting with the radar record. CNN's animation, which also shows a significant post-explosion climb, contradicts the evidence and is bad journalism.
The government's scenario requires Flight 800 climbing sharply in order to explain witness accounts of a rising streak of light seen before the crash. But since Flight 800 did not climb, as evidenced by the radar record, the missile theory is the only remaining theory that is viable.
The CNN show did discuss the missile theory, but said there was no physical evidence of missile impact. This was misleading and inaccurate. In fact, CNN only discussed damage consistent with a small, shoulder-fired missile. But two days after the crash, CNN quoted a top Pentagon official saying that these missiles couldn't reach Flight 800.
See:
http://www.cnn.com/US/9607/19/twa/index.htmlSince smaller missiles couldn't likely reach Flight 800, the CNN Presents producers should not have been surprised there was no evidence of their impact. But in actuality, there was both physical and radar evidence consistent with a proximity explosion of a much larger missile. This evidence was not addressed in the 'No Survivors' show.
Contact: Tom Stalcup, FIRO Chairman, 774-392-0856,
http://flight800.org/cnn_presents2.html
Printer-friendly format
Email this thread to a friend
Bookmark this thread
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
