Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Rice Calls Idea Iraq War Contributed To Regional Instability ‘Grotesque'

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
 
kpete Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-16-06 10:21 AM
Original message
Rice Calls Idea Iraq War Contributed To Regional Instability ‘Grotesque'
Rice Calls Idea That Iraq War Contributed To Regional Instability ‘Grotesque’

Today on ABC’s This Week, George Stephanopoulos pointed out that the Bush administration repeatedly promised that war in Iraq would bring peace and stability to the Middle East. But as the recent violence in the Middle East has shown, the region has actually fallen deeper into instability and unrest since the war began. Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice told Stephanopoulos it was “grotesque” to suggest that the Iraq war contributed to that instability.



STEPHANOPOULOS: Extremists now appear to have been emboldened. The moderates appear to be in retreat. There is no peace process. There is war. How do you answer administration critics who say that the administration’s actions have unleashed, have helped unleash the very hostilities you hoped to contain?

RICE: Well, first of all, those hostilities were not very well contained as we found out on September 11th, so the notion that policies that finally confront extremism are actually causing extremism, I find grotesque.

VIDEO and Full transcript:
http://thinkprogress.org/2006/07/16/rice-grotesque/



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Warpy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-16-06 10:24 AM
Response to Original message
1. That gap toothed harpy is still fighting the USSR
It's her area of expertise, although she never published much of anything about her area of expertise, so we have to question even that.

Like the rest of this bunch, she has no fucking idea what she's talking about.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kagemusha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-16-06 10:24 AM
Response to Original message
2. I somehow think that's not a word women should use on TV.
I think for obvious reasons...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kittenpants Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-16-06 10:28 AM
Response to Reply #2
6. I'm a woman and I haven't heard this rule... can you explain?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Demit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-16-06 10:48 AM
Response to Reply #2
11. Not so obvious to me. What are you talking about?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kagemusha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-16-06 10:56 AM
Response to Reply #11
13. ...Read down a couple of posts please.
Women should not want to be associated with the word 'grotesque' because it immediately makes the listener look at the person's face, and if that face is wanting, then the moral outrage the word is intended to convey becomes drowned out.

I wasn't trying to make it into some tyrannical male rule, damnit. Sorry.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kittenpants Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-16-06 10:59 AM
Response to Reply #13
15. I'm not trying to pick on what you said,
but I think that's the listener's problem, not the woman's. I'm NOT a fan of Condi, but I find her character a lot more grotesque than her face.

Like I said, I'm not trying to pick on YOUR post because a lot of people DID immediately react that way, so you're not wrong. I guess it's just a pet peeve of mine.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kagemusha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-16-06 11:11 AM
Response to Reply #15
16. She's SecState, a professional diplomat, and she walked into it.
Seems to me that says a lot about how she conducts her job. I couldn't care less how she looks as an individual. As you said, the character's a lot more important. But the word she used is hard to justify even without the negative personal impression she makes. She just somehow makes it even worse.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Demit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-16-06 12:26 PM
Response to Reply #13
21. No need to single out women here. Cheney & grotesque would apply.
Unless you are letting it slip that you think of course women are judged on their appearance and it is up to them to be consciously aware at all times & avoid anything, even the words they use, that might give them a negative review in the looks department. Oy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kagemusha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-16-06 12:41 PM
Response to Reply #21
22. That's the impression I feared people like you would take.
What I'm saying is that it's unnecessary for a supposed diplomat to go OUT OF HER WAY to compel people to make negative impressions whether they have such intent or not. And yes, there are things that men would be WISE not to say too, especially in a diplomacy position... like referring to pigs while standing next to a female government leader like Bush did last week, for one example.

At any rate it's not really all that important. I'd love to argue why Condi's comment is itself ugly and unsightly for its own intellectual sake but, I'll save my powder. I'd be preaching to the choir about it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Demit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-16-06 01:00 PM
Response to Reply #22
24. "People like me"? Who read words as they are written?
You said "women" in your first post, not "supposed diplomat". Look, I'm not going to beat a dead horse here, you made a slip and it's not the first time that somebody of otherwise good will lets show that they hold an unattractive point of view on something. I don't care if you think Condi Rice is ugly, I do too, when she makes certain expressions; she is breathtakingly ugly then, and I think it comes from her temperament if not her very soul. Just watch it with the "women should" statements, please.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kagemusha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-16-06 01:25 PM
Response to Reply #24
25. Thank you for calling me a vile sexist bigoted scumbag by other words.
That really made my day, thank you very much. The only reason I mentioned the word "woman" is that, based on the picture in the original post, she appears to be one. That was my only consideration, but I don't think anything I say now will convince you I'm anything but vile sexist bigoted scum so, have a nice day.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Demit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-16-06 01:45 PM
Response to Reply #25
26. LOL! But I didn't, by any stretch. And why do you insist on mischaracter-
izing what you said in your first post when it's there for anybody to see? You referred to women, plural--women in general. That's the whole point.

You poor man. You wouldn't have had to paraphrase what I said if, indeed, that was what I meant to convey. I can string my own nasty words together pretty well. I said what I meant, in the tone that I said it, and I hope that when you calm down a bit you will be able to see that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kagemusha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-16-06 02:44 PM
Response to Reply #26
30. Just to put this thing to rest...
What I wrote in the original post was not some Freudian slip exposing some deep hatred and resentment of women. I wasn't attacking an entire gender. I wasn't trying to stuff women back into a dark hole and trying to turn the clock back a few centuries.

I was stating that women using a grotesque word like "grotesque" is unhelpful to them and they shouldn't employ the term - for shock value, as it was here - because it reflects badly on the person who's speaking. I'm sorry you're offended that somehow what I said sounds excessively gender specific. As I said, I find it in equally poor taste for men to loudly refer to pigs in the presence of women, such as Chancellor Merkel of Germany, because of a simple problem: it leads the listener to look for negative points of reference. In the case of pigs, to wonder if Bush could have possibly meant the woman standing next to him. (No, he meant pot roast, but it's in poor taste to make me even have to think of it at what was supposed to be a diplomatic photo-op.) As for grotesque, it's dragging a conversation into the mud and making "looks" an issue for no good reason. Miss Rice could have said wrong, distasteful, ugly, perverse, etc, all strong language but without the excessive... undiplomatic behavior. And undignified behavior. I think my assuming a woman in her position ought to have dignity is being read as an assumption too far. I find that unfortunate.

I don't think Madeline Albright would've stooped that low, that's all.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Velveteen Ocelot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-16-06 10:24 AM
Response to Original message
3. Grotesque? Condi, you're grotesque.
You and your squinty-eyed, knuckle-dragging sweetie and the Thing from the Crypt Cheney and all the other deranged PNACers responsible for this disaster. And STFU about 9/11. That's especially grotesque.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CountAllVotes Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-16-06 10:31 AM
Response to Reply #3
9. that is what I was going to say!
Like the poster below - look in the mirror you ugly b*tch!

What a damn idiot! :dunce:

duh!

:kick:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Velveteen Ocelot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-16-06 11:35 AM
Response to Reply #9
17. I don't think CondorLizard is physically ugly
(though she could use a little dental work). I think her ideas and statements and politics and the pinheads she hangs out with are grotesque.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tbyg52 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-16-06 02:14 PM
Response to Reply #3
28. How I heard the exchange quoted here
I heard Stephanopoulos say "What do you say to people who say that the conflict in Iraq has made us less safe?" and I heard Condi say "911! 911! 911!" Now, I realize they do say that a lot, but this particular one got my attention as being particularly blatant, particularly unrelated, and particularly early in the sentence.

Call me easily excited, but I screamed, frightening the dogs, and shot out of bed (which I *never* do) with my blood pumping (which seldom happens before noon). I'd hire Condi as an alarm clock. :silly:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blogslut Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-16-06 05:33 PM
Response to Reply #28
36. That poor dead horse
How many more times can they beat it until it's nothing but a mass of unrecognizable goo?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
panader0 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-16-06 10:25 AM
Response to Original message
4. "grotesque"? She should look in the mirror.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
opihimoimoi Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-16-06 10:26 AM
Response to Original message
5. I find her, the Sec of State, to be GROTESQUE and APPALLING
INEPT AND OVER HER HEAD...she blunders on acting like she knows something....

"we never expected them to use airplanes...."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Spazito Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-16-06 10:28 AM
Response to Original message
7. Again with the projection, using the word grotesque to describe
something other than what she and the cabal are and that is extremely grotesque. I am surprised, however, that she did not say "No one could have known this would happen....", I guess they have finally realized that dog don't hunt anymore.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Botany Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-16-06 10:29 AM
Response to Original message
8. Lying Bitch!
We are now powerless to respond ......

Way to go gang .... BTW quit linking Iran to everything too.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
stepnw1f Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-16-06 10:31 AM
Response to Original message
10. Your Mentality, Condi, is What is Grotesque
Edited on Sun Jul-16-06 10:31 AM by stepnw1f
Nobody is buying your bullshit anymore. All the PR GOP hackery can't hide your ugliness anymore.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
susu369 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-16-06 10:54 AM
Response to Original message
12. Why so gloomy looking, Condi?


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Eric J in MN Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-16-06 10:58 AM
Response to Original message
14. On the one hand, what is going on in Lebanaon now might
...be happening if the US hadn't invaded Iraq.

On the other hand, supporters of the Iraq War promised before it started that it would bring peace between Israel and her neighbors.

http://thismodernworld.com/3001

One excellent example from a September, 2002 issue of the New Republic can be found here. As you’d expect, it’s written by Martin “I Have Literally Never Been Correct About Anything In My Entire Life” Peretz:

"The road to Jerusalem more likely leads through Baghdad than the reverse. Once the Palestinians see that the United States will no longer tolerate their hero Saddam Hussein, depressed though they may be, they may also come finally to grasp that Israel is here to stay and that accommodating to this reality is the one thing that can bring them the generous peace they require..."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
malaise Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-16-06 11:36 AM
Response to Original message
18. Rice is Grotesque n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProgressiveEconomist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-18-06 01:34 AM
Response to Reply #18
42. Kick
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SammyBlue Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-16-06 11:37 AM
Response to Original message
19. You stupid, miserable, unhappy, gap toothed litte media whore.
Your policies have turned the arabs into America and Israel hating murderers. Your policies were short sighted and lacked a basic knowledge of the conflict and the region.

All this blood is on your hands, you fucking witch!!! Jews don't believe in hell, but for you, I'll make an exception! I hope you rot you war criminal!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jberryhill Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-16-06 11:47 AM
Response to Original message
20. She's right

Bush's policies have contributed to instability, and the results are grotesque.

She's well on the way to a cognitive break.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
smoogatz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-16-06 12:43 PM
Response to Original message
23. They actually believe Reagan won the Cold War
by talking the Soviet Union to death, and murdering a few Cuban engineers in Grenada. That's where this rhetoric about confronting extremism comes from. The obvious follow-up question is: Y'know, Condi, if "confronting extremism" (i.e., invading countries that talk tough but pose no threat to us) is such a recipe for success, why didn't y'all undertake it as soon as you took office, instead of waiting for the terrorists to attack us?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Clarkie1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-16-06 04:28 PM
Response to Reply #23
34. I'd like to know what you think of this article
Edited on Sun Jul-16-06 04:28 PM by Clarkie1
if you have the inclination to read it. Your question is an excellent one, by the way.

http://www.washingtonmonthly.com/features/2004/0405.clark.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
smoogatz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-16-06 09:32 PM
Response to Reply #34
40. Skimmed it--
Basically, I think Clark is exactly right. He's a very astute guy, well-schooled in history (among other things). He'd make a fine running mate for Al Gore, IMO.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
symbolman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-16-06 05:42 PM
Response to Reply #23
39. Hear Hear!!
"Condi, if "confronting extremism" (i.e., invading countries that talk tough but pose no threat to us) is such a recipe for success, why didn't y'all undertake it as soon as you took office, instead of waiting for the terrorists to attack us? "

THIS NEEDS to be SHOUTED from the ROOFTOPS, over and over, ceaselessly, on every blog, on every tv and radio show - rinse, repeat until the Media HAS to confront it.

Enough blogs and sites keep saying this they WILL have to deal with it - we've made that happen before.

GREAT CALL, simple, effective, elegant, unstoppable logic. Love it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ContraBass Black Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-16-06 02:00 PM
Response to Original message
27. The truth is often grotesque nowadays.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Donald Ian Rankin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-16-06 02:39 PM
Response to Original message
29. I note that she said "grotesque" rather than "untrue"...
NT
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jacobin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-16-06 02:45 PM
Response to Reply #29
31. That pretty much sums it up
Whenever someone points out the failures of this administration, they don't deny it. They simply call the fact that you are pointing out the truth a bad name.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
aint_no_life_nowhere Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-16-06 02:49 PM
Response to Reply #29
32. Exactly - the fact the Iraq war has caused instability is grotesque
Condi is saying 'I don't like the sound of what you said, even though it's true'.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gulliver Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-16-06 05:36 PM
Response to Reply #29
38. Slam!! That ought to be the official Dem response! n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Clarkie1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-16-06 04:25 PM
Response to Original message
33. She is such a fucking idiot. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
yellowcanine Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-16-06 05:08 PM
Response to Original message
35. I find Condi's enabling of premptive warmaking grotesque.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bridgit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-16-06 05:35 PM
Response to Original message
37. Dr. Rice has lost her marbles...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AnOhioan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-16-06 09:33 PM
Response to Original message
41. Unbelievable the crap that comes out of neocon mouths n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 01:28 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC