Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Some of Novak's Fellow Columnists Don't Buy Plame Explanation

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
 
sabra Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-17-06 02:40 PM
Original message
Some of Novak's Fellow Columnists Don't Buy Plame Explanation


http://www.editorandpublisher.com/eandp/news/article_display.jsp?vnu_content_id=1002840568

Some of Novak's Fellow Columnists Don't Buy Plame Explanation

NEW YORK Robert Novak received a lot of criticism and some support when he outed CIA operative Valerie Plame in his column of July 14, 2003. But what do people think about Novak's actions since then?

...

"I wonder whether Mr. Novak has an editor," said National Society of Newspaper Columnists (NSNC) President Mike Argento. "In his column, he writes that he decided not to give up his sources and then, a few sentences later, he writes that he gave them up when questioned by Fitzgerald. Which is it? I know he says Fitzgerald knew who his sources were, but still, he named them."

The York (Pa.) Daily Record columnist added: "To maintain credibility with readers, columnists have to write honest columns. It's not our job to be an errand boy for politicians seeking vengeance against enemies. It used to be that confidential sources sought to blow the whistle against abuses of power. Now, at least in this instance, they're used to abuse power and to allow those in power to assault enemies without leaving evidence."

Argento said he thinks Novak's July 12 column was "a failed attempt to restore whatever credibility he had before the episode began. He seeks to have it both ways -- to appear to be a champion of a free press and to appear to have cooperated with authorities. I'm not buying it."


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
MADem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-17-06 03:06 PM
Response to Original message
1. He seeks to have it both ways
Actually, I think he's trying to pull a fast one, and hopes now that all is said and done that people will TAKE it that way.

What he really sought was to keep his crippled, tired, sick-wife, broken-hip ass OUT OF JAIL. That was his primary, really, his ONLY goal.

And he would have Monica'd Fitz on the steps of the Supreme Court if that is what it would have taken. There was NO WAY that boy was gonna do time, NO WAY.

He sang like Pavarotti, with or without inducement.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Catherine Vincent Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-17-06 05:04 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. "...crippled, tired, sick-wife, broken-hip ass OUT OF JAIL"
LOL! (at your description and not at his misfortunes).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MADem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-17-06 05:48 PM
Response to Reply #2
6. Well, you can see all that etched on his face
He just started crumbling the minute the crap hit the fan.

He went from snarky, vicious, superior asshole to whining old man harrumphing "BULLSHIT!!!" on CNN in what seemed like a brief moment!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kskiska Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-17-06 06:09 PM
Response to Reply #6
8. It was also the money.
He pretty much admitted how he considered how much it would cost him to keep his mouth shut, and probably wouldn't win anyway. On Crossfire, Begala constantly ribbed him on how much money he had. Apparently, he's a tightwad, and didn't want to spend it on lawyers.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Missy Vixen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-17-06 05:35 PM
Response to Reply #1
5. I think I need to lie down now
>And he would have Monica'd Fitz on the steps of the Supreme Court if that is what it would have taken.<

Poor Patrick.

The mind boggles.

Julie
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DoYouEverWonder Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-18-06 06:54 AM
Response to Reply #5
13. Gives new meaning
to the idea of playing the her-monica.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
npincus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-17-06 05:09 PM
Response to Original message
3. how can he get away with "Traitor Aldrich Ames outed her first" BS?
oh really? Were she "outed" wouldn't Brewster Jennings' operations have ceased? By saying Plame was already "outed"- isn't that an acknowledgement of her covert status?

That old shitbag has been given a pass in the MSM-- just like the fact that the sitting VP of the US is being sued by the Wilsons has gotten such short shrift in the MSM. Clinton couldn't get a f*cking haircut in Air Force One without declaring it a SCANDAL.

What a f*cking joke.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Blutodog Donating Member (291 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-17-06 05:21 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. The Haircut
Really! This is without a doubt the most corrupt administration in US history but you'd never know it. It's almost as if GOP corruption is a given so why bother reporting on it. if a demo had had even 1 of the monor scandals in this admin. we'd be hearing about it 24/7. Now if a demo. is corrupt it just shows they all do it right? A demo get's caught stealing a loaf of bread and that's the moral equivalence of Billions pilfered for a War for profit? It's sickening.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sherman A1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-17-06 06:08 PM
Response to Original message
7. The response of a 2 year old
It's not my fault, I didn't do it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gratuitous Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-17-06 06:12 PM
Response to Original message
9. Which explanation aren't they buying?
That the Plame outing was forced upon him by evil-doers in the White House? Or that he got the information on Plame from Who's Who? Or that it was a "throwaway" sentence in the middle of a column about something else entirely? Or . . . ?

Because if you don't like any of those explanations, I'm sure that Mr. Novak can come up with a few more.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Biernuts Donating Member (446 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-18-06 06:50 AM
Response to Reply #9
12. His statement - the only data point he claims to have gotten from
Wilson's Who's Who Bio was her name. He looked that up after his primary source disclosed her CIA association and role in Wilson's trip.

The Agency connction was from his officially unnamed primary source, unofficially reported to be Dep Secretary of State Richard Armitage.

"One by one last week, a parade of current and former senior officials, including the CIA's George Tenet and national-security adviser Stephen Hadley, denied being the source. A conspicuous exception was former deputy secretary of State Richard Armitage, whose office would only say, "We're not commenting." He was one of a handful of top officials who had access to the information. He is an old source and friend of Woodward's, and he fits Novak's description of his source as "not a partisan gunslinger."

Newsweek, Nov 28, 2005, <http://msnbc.msn.com/id/10117465/site/newsweek/>


"Joe Wilson's wife's role in instituting her husband's mission was revealed to me in the middle of a long interview with an official who I have previously said was not a political gunslinger."

HEOL, July 12, 2006, <http://www.humaneventsonline.com/article.php?id=15988>
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BrklynLiberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-17-06 06:44 PM
Response to Original message
10. I heard him on "Meet The Press" and he did not make any sense at all.
He reminded me very much of a 3-year-old trying to explain his way out of being caught with his hand in the cookie jar.
"But Mommy,the cookie jar jumped onto my hand. Really!"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
stepnw1f Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-17-06 08:46 PM
Response to Original message
11. An Old Mean Pathetic Sniveling Man
He sold his soul for what?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 23rd 2024, 10:51 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC