Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

N.C. Woman Fights For Right To Live With Her Boyfriend

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
 
kurth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-18-06 07:51 AM
Original message
N.C. Woman Fights For Right To Live With Her Boyfriend
Unmarried In North Carolina
BURGAW, N.C., July 18, 2006

(CBS/AP) A North Carolina woman who says her boss threatened to fire her because she was living with her boyfriend should be able to challenge the 200-year-old law that forced her from her job, attorneys argued in court Monday. The American Civil Liberties Union has asked a Superior Court judge to allow Debora Hobbs to pursue her case because a threat to enforce the law prompted her to quit her job as a Pender County 911 operator in 2004. The Attorney General's Office argues that Hobbs should not be allowed to challenge the law because she was not charged with a crime.

"It's enough to show you've been harmed by the law, you don't have to wait to be prosecuted under it to challenge it," says Jennifer Rudinger, executive director of the ACLU of North Carolina. The nonprofit civil liberties group sued on behalf of Hobbs last year, arguing that the law violates numerous rights guarantees by the U.S. Constitution – including the right to freedom of religion and expression – as well as rights guaranteed by the North Carolina state Constitution. North Carolina is one of seven states that still have laws on the books prohibiting cohabitation of unmarried couples. The others are Virginia, West Virginia, Florida, Michigan, Mississippi and North Dakota.

Hobbs says that shortly after she began working for Pender County in 2004, Sheriff Carson Smith learned she had been living with her boyfriend for about three years and at that time told her to get married, stop living with him or find another job. Hobbs says with those being the choices, she quit the job. "I just didn't think it was any of my employer's business whether I was married or not, as long as I was good at my job," Hobbs said last year when the ACLU first filed suit on her behalf. "I couldn't believe that I was being given this ultimatum to choose between my boyfriend or my livelihood because the sheriff wanted to enforce a 200-year-old law that clearly violates my civil rights."

Attorneys for the sheriff say he was just doing his job: upholding the law. The law in question, which has been on the books since 1805, says: "If any man and woman, not being married to each other, shall lewdly and lasciviously associate, bed and cohabit together, they shall be guilty of a Class 2 misdemeanor."...

http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2006/07/18/national/main1812302.shtml
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
SheepyMcSheepster Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-18-06 07:52 AM
Response to Original message
1. I bet he was more interested in imposing his morality
than he was upholding the law.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
acmejack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-18-06 08:00 AM
Response to Reply #1
3. He was interested in flaunting his power over her.
He had to show her he had power and that she was subordinate on and off the job. What a worthless prick, I wouldn't want to work for the SOB in the first place. Of course money is money, but just on the principle of the thing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-18-06 07:55 AM
Response to Original message
2. Wait til my 78-year old dad, who lives with his girlfriend, gets a
load of this! I'm sure he'll be glad he got outa NC while the gettin' was good!
Sad to contemplate this is what is taking up space in their tiny little minds.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ixion Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-18-06 08:02 AM
Response to Original message
4. Florida...
the cohabitation state. :rofl:



Really, there millions of 'unmarried couples' living together here. What a stupid law. That it is even on the books is just ridiculous. :rofl:

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dhalgren Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-18-06 08:15 AM
Response to Original message
5. There will probably be a push to make this a nation-wide law.
That way the fascists will be able to persecute gays legally. Wait. The law says "man and woman" - so it's legal for gays to cohabit...We have to amend the constitution to say that a "man and man, or a woman and woman" cannot cohabit! We have to do this for the sanctity of shacking-up! We have to ban gays from cohabitation in order to save shacking-up! It's in the "Bible"!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LostinVA Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-18-06 08:47 AM
Response to Original message
6. What a surprise, Pender County -- NOT
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
chat_noir Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-18-06 08:56 AM
Response to Original message
7. Limbaugh "lived in sin" - here's the proof



Limbaugh's second marriage license 5 years later: http://records.co.jackson.mo.us/imgcache/marriage106094-1-2.pdf
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RB TexLa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-18-06 01:23 PM
Response to Original message
8. Almost as bad as people who want to fire those who smoke

on their own time.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sun May 12th 2024, 02:28 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC