Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

100-0 is the Senate vote (but which bill?).

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-18-06 03:27 PM
Original message
100-0 is the Senate vote (but which bill?).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
burythehatchet Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-18-06 03:30 PM
Response to Original message
1. Probably Rick SanScrotum's groundbreaking
legislation stating that it is forbidden to have embryo harvesting farms.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DanCa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-18-06 03:31 PM
Response to Original message
2. I dont know
I can't watch it I got too much personally invested in this. The results are too nerve racking.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
helderheid Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-18-06 03:32 PM
Response to Original message
3. HR 2754 is what is on the screen
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
napi21 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-18-06 03:38 PM
Response to Reply #3
5. It also says it requires NIH to use anything for SS research except
embryos. I think that's HR 810, although my csan screen says HR2754 too. I think it's a cspan error. I looked up 2754 and it's about water and the environment.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tkadmin Donating Member (27 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-20-06 09:08 PM
Response to Reply #5
25.  It also says it requires NIH to use anything for SS research except embryos
Now here is something we can work on.  The gov won't give any
money, but I hear that some companies are trying to raise some
money to do it anyway.  
Trust me,  you don't want the government involved with this. 
Can you imagine the restrictions the gov could put on anybody
that takes tax money for this?

Anybody know if there is a website or something doin' this? 
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Up2Late Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-18-06 03:36 PM
Response to Original message
4. Here it is! (I think)
Big suprise!

<http://thomas.loc.gov/cgi-bin/bdquery/z?d108:h.r.02754:>
H.R.2754
Title: Making appropriations for energy and water development for the fiscal year ending September 30, 2004, and for other purposes.
Sponsor: Rep Hobson, David L. (introduced 7/16/2003) Cosponsors (None)
Related Bills: H.RES.444, H.R.529, S.1424
Latest Major Action: Became Public Law No: 108-137
House Reports: 108-212; Latest Conference Report: 108-357 (in Congressional Record H11010-11118) :sarcasm:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DanCa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-18-06 03:38 PM
Response to Reply #4
6. LOL.
Thanks for the laugh I needed it. Is it wrong to be sweating bullets over this?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
napi21 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-18-06 03:40 PM
Response to Reply #6
8. So now cspan corrects their error. HR810 vote is coming up!
Hmmm, lack of communication there too I guess!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Up2Late Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-18-06 03:48 PM
Response to Reply #8
9. Yeah, that was weird, putting up the number of a 2 year old...
...bill about flood control.

Here's the real one: <http://thomas.loc.gov/cgi-bin/bdquery/z?d109:h.r.00810:>
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sinkingfeeling Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-18-06 03:39 PM
Response to Original message
7. S 3504 just passed 100-0. They're voting on Santorum's now.
Edited on Tue Jul-18-06 03:44 PM by sinkingfeeling
Edited: S 2754 also passed 100-0....ugh! I don't like that.

It is the purpose of this Act to--

(1) intensify research that may result in improved understanding of or treatments for diseases and other adverse health conditions; and

(2) promote the derivation of pluripotent stem cell lines, including from postnatal sources, without creating human embryos for research purposes or discarding, destroying, or knowingly harming a human embryo or fetus.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Up2Late Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-18-06 03:52 PM
Response to Reply #7
10. If he tries to Veto these, he will also get his first Veto overridden...
Edited on Tue Jul-18-06 03:53 PM by Up2Late
...by the Congress too.

Another bad choice by the Chimp. :evilgrin:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DanCa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-18-06 03:54 PM
Response to Reply #10
11. can you give me an update please.
I am on pins and needles here. Thank You.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Idioteque Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-18-06 03:58 PM
Response to Reply #11
12. HR 810, the real embryonic stem cell research bill passes 63 to 37
Not a veto proof majority.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rox63 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-18-06 04:00 PM
Response to Reply #12
14. I thought veto overrides
only took 60 votes? Or is it 67?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DanCa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-18-06 04:01 PM
Response to Reply #14
16. I thought it was sixty too . I am confused now. (nt)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
napi21 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-18-06 04:06 PM
Response to Reply #16
17. They need 67 for override.
Though the Senate is expected to garner at least 60 votes to pass the legislation, it is not clear whether the Senate will obtain at least 67 votes to override a presidential veto. The House of Representatives passed the measure last May , but fell short of the two-thirds majority needed to override a veto. Sen. Arlen Specter (R-PA) has sought broad Senate support of the bill, while Senate Majority Leader Bill Frist (R-TN) facilitated a vote on the bill after a year of inaction.


http://jurist.law.pitt.edu/paperchase/2006/07/senate-to-vote-on-stem-cell-research.php
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DanCa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-18-06 04:11 PM
Response to Reply #17
18. Thank you for the information. So damn close you know.
Did Liebermen vote against the bill?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DanCa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-18-06 04:00 PM
Response to Reply #12
15. Before the Chimp vetos this bill
I want him to a sit in my wheel chair for one day and visit a stem cell lab. Is that too much too ask?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Up2Late Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-18-06 04:14 PM
Response to Reply #15
19. I bet they'll pick up a few more votes after the November e-lection.
I think they could still do the re-vote durring (sorry, no offence intended, but this is what they call it) the lame duck session.

I doubt it would be that difficult, getting 4 more votes from Senators to switch their votes, when they just lost an election.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sinkingfeeling Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-18-06 03:59 PM
Response to Original message
13. HR 810 was passed 63-37. Not enough for an over-ride of a veto.
This is the one that 'counted' and the one Chimp promised to veto.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
liberalitch Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-18-06 04:18 PM
Response to Original message
20. If Allen and Warner vote Nay..... than I hope it works to defeat them..
this fall..... I hope they're both gone anyways....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Idioteque Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-18-06 04:50 PM
Response to Reply #20
21. John Warner is pro choice....he voted for the bill. Allen voted no. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
liberalitch Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-19-06 07:47 AM
Response to Reply #21
23. Warner..... I can tolerate.....
Allen is a sycophant.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
alarimer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-18-06 05:29 PM
Response to Original message
22. They need to make this a campaign issue
"bush wants people who suffer from diabetes, MS and Parkinson's to die instead of being able to use treatments that may become available from stem cell research. He puts the "lives" of a few cells ahead of the lives of millions of Americans who live with these diseases every day. Bush is NOT pro-life, he is pro-disease". Etc.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
liberalitch Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-19-06 08:12 AM
Response to Reply #22
24. His rich friends can afford medical treatment in more....
evolved nations.....
What does he care if disease takes huge swaths of the under $500K per yer crowd here?

Odd from a man whose sister died of a disease that may one day be CURED because of stem cell research.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 16th 2024, 12:01 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC