Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Latest targets of air blitz: milk and medicine

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
 
spindrifter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-18-06 09:04 PM
Original message
Latest targets of air blitz: milk and medicine
By Lysandra Ohrstrom
Daily Star staff
Wednesday, July 19, 2006


BEIRUT: Israel switched gears in its military campaign against Lebanon Monday and Tuesday, launching a series of debilitating air strikes against privately owned factories throughout the country and dealing a devastating blow to an economy already paralyzed by a week of hits on residential areas and crucial infrastructure.

The production facilities of at least five companies in key industrial sectors - including the country's largest dairy farm, Liban Lait; a paper mill; a packaging firm and a pharmaceutical plant - have been disabled or completely destroyed. Industry insiders say the losses will cripple the economy for decades to come.

"I think the picture will be much worse than we can possible imagine when the whole thing ends, but the direct damage from yesterday's attacks to the industrial sector alone will take years to recover from," said Wajid al-Bisri, the vice-president of the Lebanese Association of Industrialists (LAI).

<snip>

"There is nothing strategic about these targets, we need the industrial sector to rebuild this country," (Former Lebanese Association of Industrialists president) Jacques Sarraf said.

<snip>

http://www.dailystar.com.lb/article.asp?edition_id=1&categ_id=2&article_id=74078
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Junkdrawer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-18-06 09:18 PM
Response to Original message
1. But, but Israel has never said they want a Muslim nation destroyed...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FairVotes4all Donating Member (139 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-18-06 09:19 PM
Response to Original message
2. Should I say that Israel shouldn't bomb Industry with no ties to Hezbollah
or would that be anti-semitic? I honestly think that Israel has a right to protect itself, but to destroy dairies? I honestly dont see lactose-based weaponry being a concern in the future.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Igel Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-19-06 11:28 AM
Response to Reply #2
11. They shouldn't.
Not anti-Semitic.

I have don't know if they bombed plants/factories with no ties to Hezbollah; I suspect they did, but I can easily imagine a legitimate reason or two for bombing them--legitimate reasons aren't that difficult to come up with. But I see no evidence for any of the to be true; in this case I also see no reason for the assertion that they weren't targets to be true.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blonndee Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-18-06 09:29 PM
Response to Original message
3. Kicked up! SHAME ON YOU ISRAEL.
I was giving them the benefit of the doubt to some extent, but no longer. This is deliberate targeting of civilians and civilian infrastructure. They are going to cripple Lebanon and ruin its chances at sustaining a democracy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Junkdrawer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-18-06 09:41 PM
Response to Reply #3
5. That would appear to be the goal: A perpetually failed state....
..and the occasional terror attack coming from said failed state only helps to keep Likud in power.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DELUSIONAL Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-18-06 09:38 PM
Response to Original message
4. "israel has a right to protect herself" -- now that that is said
What motive is there to punish all Lebanon??

All I can think of that this is an old blood feud that will go on and on and on and on. That civilians get in the way -- that children will get sick and die -- so what? They don't count.

Or is Lebanon supposed to be another Gaza or West Bank -- where the people are kept in primitive conditions and the unemployed rate is something like 75+%.

I'm just trying to figure out the reasoning behind this assault on the civilian infrastructure.

Is a healthy vibrant economy a threat (and thus Israel needs to protect herself)?

Just trying to understand the logic involved in a blood feud.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Junkdrawer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-18-06 09:47 PM
Response to Original message
6. K&R
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jonnyblitz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-18-06 11:13 PM
Response to Original message
7. no comment necessary..
it's obvious to those with a clue..

:puke:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JackNewtown Donating Member (703 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-18-06 11:30 PM
Response to Original message
8. Israel has a right to defend itself
Milk, facial tissue, etc. are a clear and present danger to the very survival of Israel. I am concerned about Israel's weak response to the use of tea. It must take a stronger stand against tea, a critical part of the infrastructure of terrorism.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blonndee Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-18-06 11:31 PM
Response to Reply #8
9. LOL very nice
Attack the terrorist teabags! Nuke em! Boil them in hot water!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
snappyturtle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-19-06 10:37 AM
Response to Original message
10. I wonder if.......
Hezbollah (sp?) is hiding in a milk processing plant? Maybe we should e-mail Powell and see if he has any pictures to clarify the situation! I hope our troops in Irag and Afghanistan are REALLY watching their backs now, every minute of every day because surely, they are even more unsafe. Insanity reigns!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Igel Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-19-06 11:40 AM
Response to Reply #10
12. Snarky, but that doesn't mean it's not a possibility.
They claim to have 12k missiles of various sizes, some of which require mobile launch trailers, some of which require rather more significant trailers or equipment. They have small outposts, but nothing large. They also have actual armed forces, and presumably fairly large quantities of non-aerial munitions.

Where do they put them? Goats?

In addition, they have what's even more dangerous: they do significant outreach, merging a doctrine of Islamic supremacy and religious hatred with feeding the poor and other social work, all the while parading as Islam's or the ummah's protector. They harvest considerable zakat (required Muslim charitable donations) from abroad for this purpose. The money doesn't go just to buy food, but to establish production facilities. The profits go back into more facilities, to additional social work, and to munitions. They've formed an Islam-based tribe, and act as a tribe. Nasrallah is the tribal chieftain.

Destroy a tribe's soldiers, and you get more soldiers. Destroy their income and resupply sources, and you disable them for a while. Long term ... nobody, even the Israelis, has the balls to deal with the underlying problem: What unifies and motivates the tribe.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
snappyturtle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-19-06 01:32 PM
Response to Reply #12
13. I see your point however,.....
I guess my maternal instincts are seething! I would think the Israeli intelligence forces would have infiltrated Hezballah. Oh, silly me....I thought that about our intelligence communities and the WMD thing. So, consequently, innocent human beings become targets by being in the wrong place at the wrong time. Such is life! Do you think my anger harbors a wee bit of sarcasm?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri May 10th 2024, 10:23 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC